moses 5-4-3 continued
session 2 of 4 continued=session 1 of exodus
until now: summarised exodus begins with: the birth of moses [2=chapter2] and israelites were slaves 1 then moses saw the "bush" [mark 12.26 please compare later] which 3.2 did NOT burn but was fiery [not a burning bush!]. moses returned to egypt and 4.30 did signs for israelites and then they believed. moses said the king should free israelites but king said 5.7 work harder. five minutes behind scedule so quick without details:
***God comforts 6.1 "with a strong hand i will free" and fufills by: god hit egypt with BLOOD: water changed 7.20 to blood. bible said blood- not red algeas and not red volcano dust or anything! ONLY if god does not exist we need such explanations for the atheists- however according to bible god does exist so prophet knew blood. the blood did NOT cause frogs to scatter away from blood because 7.25 frogs are LATER not the same time as blood.
the fish died therefore even as new water flowed in the river, egyptians could not drink 7.24 "water" because of the dead fish. egyptian magician took "water" of 7.24 and 7.22 made it blood so paro said magic not god. [i need to write a song using the rhyme egyptian magician]
for egyptian magic we can say they moved "red algea" into the water.
God sent 8.6 frogs and 9.10 boils and more until 10.11 paro compromised [i wish i could compare josepus version of compromise because it is different but no time now] men go, which is not god's plan so moses 11.5 warns death of the first-born sons.
whoo- now i can slow the pace.
I rely on the fact that chapters 20-31 are many laws and that 4 of those chapters are completely repeated a bit later.
god commanded 12.3 take a lamb and put blood on sides and top of doors. do not cook it in water only over a fire- barbecue [bar+B+Q]. remember this day 12.14 forever. forever?
is this extra? if word of god permanent, it seems extra to say for certain details "forever" or for "generations" rabbinic commentaries are disturbed by this extra word-
and said "without the word 'generations' the command is one generation"
GASP
that means although the promise of god is irrevocable, gods plan is not to serve by actions- and this is why the commands only have the word generations by certain details. based on text itself it is not extra but rather distinguishes which details are to be repeated in future years- certain ones are for generations, however to say all are "for generations" is baseless and even rabbis who say "do+do+do" admit that this is not god's plan. one commentator adds "generations" means two generations only, until it said "forever with generations". quite a surprise- but that is the tradition of "grab the minimum" in jew-oral tradition. if so the study of the bible is not for instructions to act, except the few specified forever.
if so the commands of passover are for one or two generations according to oral tradition and text and rabbinic comments too, so no need for jew to do all the details beside the details which are specified as generations. this matches paul saying 2 cor. 3.7-11 [please check later] the law of moses even what was on stone fades away and hebrew translators used the word "btl" there, which means cancelled. only the few exceptions such as 'ushmartem" which means remember [as written in many jewish books talmud psahim "think", rashi deuteronomy "study" and ramban on exodus 20 remember in thought" and more] remember forever.
this matches jeremiah 31.31-33 a new covenant "inside" inside fulfills and no need for ritual ceremonies- "different" from previous "not like" because "inside" fulfills when is new covenant? a covenant with god needs blood exodus 24 [not summarized see below]. regardless it matches and the rituals are not for repeating after moses.
jesus' death is connected to the passover and the day is remembered forever among jews and everyone so the prophecy of forever is fulfilled as well.
moses repeats god's instructions but not exactly! he tells different details not saying some of what god told him and adding details 12.22 apply blood with hysop- an addition "Take a bunch of hyssop, dip it into the blood in the basin and put some of the blood on the top and on both sides of the doorframe" to clarify how to do what god said practically. it is "how" to put blood not a new "action" added. note the change in order! although god said "sides and top" quoted above, moses said "top and sides" and wrote both to teach that even in the moses generation of "do" it was not legalistc even under law! the order is not important and other legalistic "doubts" can be shrugged off as "all are fine" without a cynical tone of voice i joke "when a religious jew goes to a church he asks "which should i hold in my right hand the communion bread or wine" moses was clear about not being so legalistic even under the law. i wonder what would happen if religious jewish teenagers would notice the commentary about "generations" that even the rabbis wrote. they might start doing communion?
they travelled and by night 13.21 a pillar of fire led them. i wonder what those who said "blood was red algea" would say about a pillar of fire leading the israelites at night- a moving bonfire as a pillar.
exodus 14.21 "21 Then Moses stretched out his hand over the sea, and all that night the Lord drove the sea back with a strong east wind and turned it into dry land. The waters were divided, 22 and the Israelites went through the sea on dry ground, with a wall of water on their right and on their left."
the egyptians saw the wind and were fooled that it was not god- many readers are fooled too- and say god did not do anything supernatural the wind did it and moses was a great meteorologist leading them on schedule.
whatever! or in slang "whatev's"
then moses sang a 15 song and the hebrew of the song is different and so estimated as older than the hebrew around it. it seems the song was sung and transmitted generations before the rest of the story was written and the song inserted. one key difference is the past form of grammar. "amar" past of said "amar" so different from the frequent "vayomer" same meaning.
israelites were supplied by 16.13-15 birds and desert bread and 17.6 water to drink.jethro visits. i seem to remember that moses wife came with moses to egypt so how she came now with her father bothers bible critics. her father has a different name? the names were both in chapter 3.1 jethro but 2.18 ruel.
if my wife cut my son i would send her to her father- at least to protect the second son. 18.2 said here that moses sent her back between. moses sets up a judge system where many leaders under him judge the laws. moses 19.2-3 go up and go down 34.28-29.
chapter 24 is a problem- how can moses interact with the nation when he is up since 20.21 at the latest unless the past tense means he made the covenant earlier and what occurred earlier was written later. another problem is that many details between chapter 19-34 are absent from josepus parallel.
i would summarize these sixteen 16 chapters 19-34 by saying "many many many laws" however the absence in the parallel and the fact that although josepus does not conceal the flaws of israel in other stories, he lacks this sin of the golden calf in chapter 32, indicate the rabbis added it later. how could they force writers to write a new story at all, especially staining the jews ancestors- unless they used brutal beatings? and what a coincidence the talmud said rabbis had that authority. who knows what else they added to the original from excluded-written-stories, after jesus and after josepus- in the talmud era when rabis beat people who did marriage ceremonies "like the mishna instruction" but "rab"= aba did not like it.
a comparison with josepus shows that much of what is in exodus between chapter 19 and 32 is not in josepus' parallel! and may not have been in the original prophecy from god- BLASPHEMY!!!
clearly i am not a christian nor a religious jew based on this suggestion- but i quote the new testament for clarifying certain issues. and i did say some things that christians agree with.
so in chapter 19 moses went up and came down in chapter 34 after hearing some laws.
the rest of exodus tells they made a wooden tent with gold utensils [chapters 35-40 repeating chapters 25,26,27,28 with every detail again and 29 will be repeated in leviticus] for service- a box and a lamp and a table an altar for spice-burning and another non-gold altar outside the wooden tent and all surrounded by curtains and all was assembled bringing us to the sacrifices in leviticus.
concluded part one of session 2 it took me twelve minutes to read this so half hour to go.
session 2 of 4 continued=session 1 of exodus
until now: summarised exodus begins with: the birth of moses [2=chapter2] and israelites were slaves 1 then moses saw the "bush" [mark 12.26 please compare later] which 3.2 did NOT burn but was fiery [not a burning bush!]. moses returned to egypt and 4.30 did signs for israelites and then they believed. moses said the king should free israelites but king said 5.7 work harder. five minutes behind scedule so quick without details:
***God comforts 6.1 "with a strong hand i will free" and fufills by: god hit egypt with BLOOD: water changed 7.20 to blood. bible said blood- not red algeas and not red volcano dust or anything! ONLY if god does not exist we need such explanations for the atheists- however according to bible god does exist so prophet knew blood. the blood did NOT cause frogs to scatter away from blood because 7.25 frogs are LATER not the same time as blood.
the fish died therefore even as new water flowed in the river, egyptians could not drink 7.24 "water" because of the dead fish. egyptian magician took "water" of 7.24 and 7.22 made it blood so paro said magic not god. [i need to write a song using the rhyme egyptian magician]
for egyptian magic we can say they moved "red algea" into the water.
God sent 8.6 frogs and 9.10 boils and more until 10.11 paro compromised [i wish i could compare josepus version of compromise because it is different but no time now] men go, which is not god's plan so moses 11.5 warns death of the first-born sons.
whoo- now i can slow the pace.
I rely on the fact that chapters 20-31 are many laws and that 4 of those chapters are completely repeated a bit later.
god commanded 12.3 take a lamb and put blood on sides and top of doors. do not cook it in water only over a fire- barbecue [bar+B+Q]. remember this day 12.14 forever. forever?
is this extra? if word of god permanent, it seems extra to say for certain details "forever" or for "generations" rabbinic commentaries are disturbed by this extra word-
and said "without the word 'generations' the command is one generation"
GASP
that means although the promise of god is irrevocable, gods plan is not to serve by actions- and this is why the commands only have the word generations by certain details. based on text itself it is not extra but rather distinguishes which details are to be repeated in future years- certain ones are for generations, however to say all are "for generations" is baseless and even rabbis who say "do+do+do" admit that this is not god's plan. one commentator adds "generations" means two generations only, until it said "forever with generations". quite a surprise- but that is the tradition of "grab the minimum" in jew-oral tradition. if so the study of the bible is not for instructions to act, except the few specified forever.
if so the commands of passover are for one or two generations according to oral tradition and text and rabbinic comments too, so no need for jew to do all the details beside the details which are specified as generations. this matches paul saying 2 cor. 3.7-11 [please check later] the law of moses even what was on stone fades away and hebrew translators used the word "btl" there, which means cancelled. only the few exceptions such as 'ushmartem" which means remember [as written in many jewish books talmud psahim "think", rashi deuteronomy "study" and ramban on exodus 20 remember in thought" and more] remember forever.
this matches jeremiah 31.31-33 a new covenant "inside" inside fulfills and no need for ritual ceremonies- "different" from previous "not like" because "inside" fulfills when is new covenant? a covenant with god needs blood exodus 24 [not summarized see below]. regardless it matches and the rituals are not for repeating after moses.
jesus' death is connected to the passover and the day is remembered forever among jews and everyone so the prophecy of forever is fulfilled as well.
moses repeats god's instructions but not exactly! he tells different details not saying some of what god told him and adding details 12.22 apply blood with hysop- an addition "Take a bunch of hyssop, dip it into the blood in the basin and put some of the blood on the top and on both sides of the doorframe" to clarify how to do what god said practically. it is "how" to put blood not a new "action" added. note the change in order! although god said "sides and top" quoted above, moses said "top and sides" and wrote both to teach that even in the moses generation of "do" it was not legalistc even under law! the order is not important and other legalistic "doubts" can be shrugged off as "all are fine" without a cynical tone of voice i joke "when a religious jew goes to a church he asks "which should i hold in my right hand the communion bread or wine" moses was clear about not being so legalistic even under the law. i wonder what would happen if religious jewish teenagers would notice the commentary about "generations" that even the rabbis wrote. they might start doing communion?
they travelled and by night 13.21 a pillar of fire led them. i wonder what those who said "blood was red algea" would say about a pillar of fire leading the israelites at night- a moving bonfire as a pillar.
exodus 14.21 "21 Then Moses stretched out his hand over the sea, and all that night the Lord drove the sea back with a strong east wind and turned it into dry land. The waters were divided, 22 and the Israelites went through the sea on dry ground, with a wall of water on their right and on their left."
the egyptians saw the wind and were fooled that it was not god- many readers are fooled too- and say god did not do anything supernatural the wind did it and moses was a great meteorologist leading them on schedule.
whatever! or in slang "whatev's"
then moses sang a 15 song and the hebrew of the song is different and so estimated as older than the hebrew around it. it seems the song was sung and transmitted generations before the rest of the story was written and the song inserted. one key difference is the past form of grammar. "amar" past of said "amar" so different from the frequent "vayomer" same meaning.
israelites were supplied by 16.13-15 birds and desert bread and 17.6 water to drink.jethro visits. i seem to remember that moses wife came with moses to egypt so how she came now with her father bothers bible critics. her father has a different name? the names were both in chapter 3.1 jethro but 2.18 ruel.
if my wife cut my son i would send her to her father- at least to protect the second son. 18.2 said here that moses sent her back between. moses sets up a judge system where many leaders under him judge the laws. moses 19.2-3 go up and go down 34.28-29.
chapter 24 is a problem- how can moses interact with the nation when he is up since 20.21 at the latest unless the past tense means he made the covenant earlier and what occurred earlier was written later. another problem is that many details between chapter 19-34 are absent from josepus parallel.
i would summarize these sixteen 16 chapters 19-34 by saying "many many many laws" however the absence in the parallel and the fact that although josepus does not conceal the flaws of israel in other stories, he lacks this sin of the golden calf in chapter 32, indicate the rabbis added it later. how could they force writers to write a new story at all, especially staining the jews ancestors- unless they used brutal beatings? and what a coincidence the talmud said rabbis had that authority. who knows what else they added to the original from excluded-written-stories, after jesus and after josepus- in the talmud era when rabis beat people who did marriage ceremonies "like the mishna instruction" but "rab"= aba did not like it.
a comparison with josepus shows that much of what is in exodus between chapter 19 and 32 is not in josepus' parallel! and may not have been in the original prophecy from god- BLASPHEMY!!!
clearly i am not a christian nor a religious jew based on this suggestion- but i quote the new testament for clarifying certain issues. and i did say some things that christians agree with.
so in chapter 19 moses went up and came down in chapter 34 after hearing some laws.
the rest of exodus tells they made a wooden tent with gold utensils [chapters 35-40 repeating chapters 25,26,27,28 with every detail again and 29 will be repeated in leviticus] for service- a box and a lamp and a table an altar for spice-burning and another non-gold altar outside the wooden tent and all surrounded by curtains and all was assembled bringing us to the sacrifices in leviticus.
concluded part one of session 2 it took me twelve minutes to read this so half hour to go.
אין תגובות:
הוסף רשומת תגובה