moses 5-4-3 deuteronomy 14 to end
until now summarized harsh violence against pagans because god is very intolerant
more likely these repetitions of "destroying" which are incompatible to the ethics in chapter 5 are not from god and similarly any thing cruel is added by cruel rabbi and not from god including any possibility of cutting a baby anywhere with a knife and any other pain to babies and adults.
continue: dt.9 you get the land "because canan is evil". period- not because you are good because you are "stiff necked" note: not-good gets land, jew haters rejoice "not because you are good- see! jews are bad- hurray"- and those bad-jews GET land so cannot lose if bad! even the new testament said so in romans 9.9-11 "9 For this is the word of promise, At this time will I come, and Sara shall have a son. 10 And not only this; but when Rebecca also had conceived by one, even by our father Isaac; 11 For the children being not yet born, neither having done any good or evil, that the purpose of God according to election might stand, not of works, but of him that calleth"- does not depend on evil nor works- and again emphasized god promise is not dependant on law in galations 3.17 "That the covenant, that was confirmed before of God in Christ, the law, which was four hundred and thirty years after, cannot disannul, that it should make the promise of none effect. 18 For if the inheritance be of the law, it is no more of promise: but God gave it to Abraham by promise." not depend but a "promise" and through sara as mentioned above romans 9.9 and irrevocable in romans 11.28-29
see for yourself
who made the ark?
moses said god said make 10.1-3 a wood ark and "I made" in contrast to the plural verb in exodus these errors show not from god and no holy spirit to prevent errors but different human opinions in the same book. fear and 10.12 love god!
Circumcise therefore the foreskin of your heart- in 10.16 does that mean CUT?
http://www.mechon-mamre.org/p/pt/pt0510.htm
there is no excuse for the cruelty of cutting infants- and not in any place and worse the sensitive sex-organ.
again 11 love god and if you listen you will get 11.14 rain god never said DO he said "listen to the commands" studied no need to do- matching the limit "these" in the first year written in leviticus a limit established many decades before this fortieth year in the beginning of this book and by context 11.5
keep 11.8 the commands- a verb different than "do" in fact several traditions of even the "oral law" say this word means study and think. that is what is expected no need to do.
break 12.3 pagan altars and no OTHER 13.3 gods
however the punishment does not match the crime and is INCOMPATIBLE with the ethics in deuteronomy 5 so we can identify this 13.10 corruption of justice and other killing of people who did not kill as from cruel anti-justice rabbis and not from god.
moses said god said make 10.1-3 a wood ark and "I made" in contrast to the plural verb in exodus these errors show not from god and no holy spirit to prevent errors but different human opinions in the same book. fear and 10.12 love god!
Circumcise therefore the foreskin of your heart- in 10.16 does that mean CUT?
http://www.mechon-mamre.org/p/pt/pt0510.htm
there is no excuse for the cruelty of cutting infants- and not in any place and worse the sensitive sex-organ.
again 11 love god and if you listen you will get 11.14 rain god never said DO he said "listen to the commands" studied no need to do- matching the limit "these" in the first year written in leviticus a limit established many decades before this fortieth year in the beginning of this book and by context 11.5
keep 11.8 the commands- a verb different than "do" in fact several traditions of even the "oral law" say this word means study and think. that is what is expected no need to do.
break 12.3 pagan altars and no OTHER 13.3 gods
however the punishment does not match the crime and is INCOMPATIBLE with the ethics in deuteronomy 5 so we can identify this 13.10 corruption of justice and other killing of people who did not kill as from cruel anti-justice rabbis and not from god.
list of animals 14 to eat- repeating leviticus 11- positioned first or more likely this original with list of birds to eat and leviticus repeated. SO EAT ANIMALS- the eater of dead animal is simply eating- nothing immoral. if the process of cattle growth and slaughter needs improvement- accuse that phase. i know one guy who said "causing cows to mate is the same as rape" what do you think? regardless we only eat the meat and only after it is too late.
***the animal should be killed with less pain- my opinion is that a brutal hammer crushing the brain instantly seems instant and the same for death penalty of humans. if someone murders it seems the most painless punishment for the crime of murder. not slicing the throat and blood spraying and imagining that the animal feels nothing for the time as it dies- the way cruel rabbis explain "religious slaughter" my opinion is slaughter with a knife should be outlawed and those who do it should be punished with prison or sent to labour in the north dakota as slave labor for 24 months and if they repeat it longer.
but that is just me.
how are animals killed? a movie published that a pressurized can punches a steel cylinder into the brain of the unsuspecting cow- instant. the movie continues with the cow-worker using it on humans which is evil because the human was not convicted of the death penalty for murder.
it would be justice for that murderer to be punished with the same instant death with the "cow puncher".
anyway that is painless and instant and unaware. and that is how we get meat and how others should too. if they only eat meat from cruel knife killing- and it is forbidden then they will not eat this meat and their preference is essentialy that THEY would be vegetarians- if they believe the meat is forbidden and choose to submit to heartless rabbis. or disobey and eat the meat like everyone else.
you 15.6 will rule many nations- not exactly fulfilled! israeli army has rebelled against this and every time it gets more land, it returns it, as it returned to syria much land and to egypt sinai and gaza to hamas. the west bank was not "returned" but granted to the authority of "palestinian authority" because the war is not to obey this verse but rather as defense. "quiet will be answered with silence" ***if the terrorists would stay home and watch TV there would be no need to shoot back.
!!
none 15.6 will rule you- gods plan is self-rule autonomy not fulfilled- until about 70 years ago. until then israel was ruled by everyone. holidays 16 are for killing animals and do not eat the passover with "sour" the word hamez means sour-dough from the root "sour" whose taste has changed to sour- no bread is like that and may be eaten according to gods law- with the passover and during the week but the jews do not notice this and think that all bread is forbidden and all flour and even many vegetables. forbade "sour" hamaz like hamuz in taste- simon never said so you are out!
our bread HAS fungus "yeast" but the bible is forbidding "sour" dough bread.
so what is my point? OUR BREAD IS NOT SOUR so eat it- just eat it. as the song "so eat it- just eat it- eatit, eatit, eatit,eatit all you got to do is eatit!"
"it is not sour
go get a life
give some bread slices
to kids and your wife
just eat it- just eat it!
just eat it!"
feast of weeks and tents josepus preserved the jew-custom to "erect the tent in the house" which removes the excuse of apartment dwellers! the tradition is INDOORS and changing from that is "not jewish"
high 17.10 court at temple- not "obey any and every rabbi" nor "leader of the group" we are so accustomed to think each group is led by theirr rabbi that i must quote: "10 And thou shalt do according to the sentence, which they of that place which the LORD shall choose shall shew thee; and thou shalt observe to do according to all that they inform thee" note the word PLACE. outside of this place they lack authority and no command to submit. so if rabbis say "god said obey me" it is the same as a child saying "the kid rules the house because i say so". sure they quote the second half of this verse and the verse after it, misleading people who do not notice the word "place" which they did not mention- only for the sake of "brevity" not to lie? i wish the jews would see for themselves
and even the hassidic website has the full quote and with hebrew
http://www.chabad.org/library/bible_cdo/aid/9981/jewish/Chapter-17.htm
a prophet 18.18 like mose will speak god's word. To him shall you listen! quote "18 I will raise them up a Prophet from among their brethren, like unto thee, and will put my words in his mouth; and he shall speak unto them all that I shall command him. 19 And it shall come to pass, that whosoever will not hearken unto my words which he shall speak in my name, I will require it of him." who is like moses? not isaiah nor jeremiah- even maimonides emphasized there is no prophet like moses- and if so the bible is false! god said that there is one like moses! more likely maimonides is false and this refers to jesus.
punish 19.11 murderers! who are you insisting to defend with mercy? a murderer? lawyers do it to claim this one is not the murderer, or to make money but once it is known- "mercy" is inappropriate or everyone will rely on no punishment and stab and shoot each other even more frequently!
quote: "11 But if any man hate his neighbour, and lie in wait for him, and rise up against him, and smite him mortally that he die, and fleeth into one of these cities: 12 Then the elders of his city shall send and fetch him thence, and deliver him into the hand of the avenger of blood, that he may die. 13 Thine eye shall not pity him, but thou shalt put away the guilt of innocent blood from Israel, that it may go well with thee." on who are you having mercy? punish the murderer. go well to prevent everyone murdering each other.
not by pushing off a roof like ISlamic state-terrorist-organization showed they did to men who lay with men! but with a punishment. did i mention instant brain crushing today?
stop laughing! murder is serious.
as the 45 minute session ends i accelerate
newly-weds 20.7 do not go to battle
the father 21.17 may not favor the son he wants but gives the double portion to the first born with objectivity he qualifies and gets it.
in summary of numbers we asked: what if a man sins with a married woman? and i explained that there is equality of man and women we see that here in 22.22 "22 If a man be found lying with a woman married to an husband, then they shall both of them die, both the man that lay with the woman, and the woman: so shalt thou put away evil from Israel." do not cheat on your wives! be loyal! or the man is punished the same as the woman. my opinion is the deat penalty is not justice for he did not kill but the lesson is what is important.
chapters 23-28 are various laws do not marry certain nations- these laws are in the fortieth year as the book deuteronomy began and therefore after the limit "these" of the first year as written in leviticus in the worship tent in the first year. means no commands so to read.
so varied it is difficult to summarise- if a man 24 divorces and she marries another she may not return to the first. jesus said do not divorce- what god made one do not separate in instances of disagreement gods plan is the woman is "help" to advise and do what the man decides as a ahelp not to hinder! a HELP!
if "marital violation" divorce- that is not only sex but a woman who "does not help her husband in the mans decision" is a violation of "help" and should be divorced no need to pay her anything- simon never said and god never said in the section of divorce.
blessed 28 are those who obey, if not what is the punishment? death? no! god gives death is without covenant romans 5.14 all egyptians etc. die but covenant is hope for israel not hell-fire and not death of soul but pain in body "28.27 The LORD will smite thee with the botch of Egypt, and with the emerods [hemeroids?], and with the scab, and with the itch, whereof thou canst not be healed." i do not want to imagine what "THE" itch means. follow only god do not 29.18 stray after other gods. jesus quotes this idea in matthew 4 only god. 30.6 "the LORD thy God will circumcise thine heart, and the heart of thy seed, to love the LORD thy God with all thine heart, and with all thy soul, that thou mayest live." does that mean CUT the heart? so you will live! "circumcise" does not mean cut/incise/sciss+ors! but by context loving words like the hebrew root "word".
chapters 23-28 are various laws do not marry certain nations- these laws are in the fortieth year as the book deuteronomy began and therefore after the limit "these" of the first year as written in leviticus in the worship tent in the first year. means no commands so to read.
so varied it is difficult to summarise- if a man 24 divorces and she marries another she may not return to the first. jesus said do not divorce- what god made one do not separate in instances of disagreement gods plan is the woman is "help" to advise and do what the man decides as a ahelp not to hinder! a HELP!
if "marital violation" divorce- that is not only sex but a woman who "does not help her husband in the mans decision" is a violation of "help" and should be divorced no need to pay her anything- simon never said and god never said in the section of divorce.
blessed 28 are those who obey, if not what is the punishment? death? no! god gives death is without covenant romans 5.14 all egyptians etc. die but covenant is hope for israel not hell-fire and not death of soul but pain in body "28.27 The LORD will smite thee with the botch of Egypt, and with the emerods [hemeroids?], and with the scab, and with the itch, whereof thou canst not be healed." i do not want to imagine what "THE" itch means. follow only god do not 29.18 stray after other gods. jesus quotes this idea in matthew 4 only god. 30.6 "the LORD thy God will circumcise thine heart, and the heart of thy seed, to love the LORD thy God with all thine heart, and with all thy soul, that thou mayest live." does that mean CUT the heart? so you will live! "circumcise" does not mean cut/incise/sciss+ors! but by context loving words like the hebrew root "word".
the book concludes with a song "moses wrote this song" implying moses did not write the book but said these words and a student wrote them and the song is harsh "they will sacrifice to devils and anger god" 32.17-19 but the english does not match the hebrew. "noz" means anger and the verbs are future.
moses blesses the tribes-
and goes up to heaven in a flaming chariot? oops wrong story.
it took me eleven minutes to read this summary.
and goes up to heaven in a flaming chariot? oops wrong story.
it took me eleven minutes to read this summary.
NOTE: having seen the content we see many evil values to note and avoid teaching and defending
I hope this summary will help people know what is in the book and only later look up what i suggest to read later and not read the actual books of moses with bad evil values- certainly not for kids and even adults only if they are critical of the contents.
I hope this summary will help people know what is in the book and only later look up what i suggest to read later and not read the actual books of moses with bad evil values- certainly not for kids and even adults only if they are critical of the contents.
אין תגובות:
הוסף רשומת תגובה