moses 5-4-3 continued
deuteronomy
the book of deuteronomy seems to repeat many things from previous books but it is probable that this is the first book written earliest and alone, and later other writers repeated its ideas and added to them in separate books which were located first because of starting with creation, and deuteronomy postioned fifth. it mentions the fear of god many times and also to love god many times
if love is a feeling of wanting to be near someone, then we should want the nearness of god.
the book begins as if moses was not writing but another person reporting "these are the words of moses" and defining the pronoun "I" in verse nine "i said" as moses saying I, when he speaks. this matches that "moses wrote this song" chapter 31.22, the song was written by moses and another assembled what moses wrote while writing what moses said, specifying that moses was the one who spoke.
the claim that the bible was written by moses himself [in josepus to genesis 2 and later rabbis] does not match and is incompatible with the wording throughout the book that only here moses said "i" and not elsewhere and even the i is defined by another writer as referring to moses
also the words "moses wrote this song" 31.22 are not needed if we [or the writer] believe the "theological claim" that all was written by moses, it is extra and superfluous to say a certain part was by moses unless we reject the assumption and only know that a part which is explicitly claimed to be "by moses" that is the song, is by moses and the rest written by a non-prophet, probably in the time of second temple as paul johnson wrote in 'history of the jews' the "second half of the first millenia BC" which means after 500 bc between 500 and 200 bc
jesus quotes the most from this book even if we deduct the quotes from the decalogue as exodus the remaining quotes from deuteronomy are more than the quotes of exodus and the two of leviicus especialy if jesus quoted the decologue of deuteronomy. jesus quotes nothing from numbers. even the quote "no broken bone" is closer to the prophecy of messiah in psalms and the footnote to numbers is in error resulting from the date misleading someone to direct the reader to numbers when in fact the idea is the idea of messiah in pslams and in fact the wording is the same wording as psalms and not a quote from numbers. anothe rflaw is that nimbers adds a story about talking to a rock that josps does not have josps tells of miriam's death but numbers adds to that section about a rock and this indicates it is a man made book written after josepus.
josepus does have the story water from a rock of hitting the rock in exodus 17.6 and if we see moses go up in chapter 19 the next thing we see is when moses comes down and there should be nothing between chapter 19 and the end of exodus 34 and in the original they were near each other but later writers changed the content to "make the teaching big" in isaiah- in which case the decalogue appeared once only and that is in deuteronomy.
moses 1.22 retells the sending of spies and the 2.24 war against amorites and 3.3 bashan.
we are warned 4.2 NO ADD to what i command "you shall not add" but rabbis do not obey god and add numerous new ceremonies: search for leaven bread and more, rebelling against god just as much as those who "subtract" commands such as secular or pagan- the rabbis are the same and even worse because FIRST is the warning do not add. the claim "secular subtract from law" is only a distraction and FIRST is the warning not to add with priority and also using this distraction shows that they have no excuse for adding which they do and "not subtracting" cannot mean "instead add" after the warning "no add"
imagine gandalf standing facing the great monster and shouting "YOU SHALL NOT PASS" [fellowship of the ring part one and repeated in beginning of part 2] with the word "add" instead of pass!
the rabbis lead the jews to rebel against gods warnings here.
the secular jews who do nothing are actualy obeying god not to ADD by not doing any additions!
the idea of "do not add" is repeating as a prohibition-form which specifies the same idea before in leviticus 26 "these" are commands, these- limiting from the end of leviticus no additional command and the idea is now repeated in deuteronomy 4.2 you shall not add any new ceremony nor any new prohibition.
the decalogue 5 deserves attention so that will be next especialy if it is the only appearance of the decalogue in the original pre-corruption bible.
אין תגובות:
הוסף רשומת תגובה