summary book esther- this week is the time!

over this weekend we should think about the the backwards suffering of religious jews next week. they insist on denying food and water at the oppositeof the joy in their calendar.

when they THEY will clebrate the happy day of "purim" the religious jews must first suffer and trick their teenagers into denial of food and water for a fast never decreed in the book of esther nor in rabbinic mishna!

such a cruel trick on teenagers.

at a time of joy the rabbis fool the teenagers into the opposite of joy= to suffer- and for what? did a prophet even decree it? no!

compare "esther 9.21 To establish this among them, that they should keep the fourteenth day of the month Adar, and the fifteenth day of the same, yearly, 22 As the days wherein the Jews rested from their enemies, and the month which was turned unto them from sorrow to joy, and from mourning into a good day: that they should make them days of feasting and joy, and of sending portions one to another, and gifts to the poor.

compare it was established "feasting and joy" reversed to a fast denying food and water- not only absent from this "establishment" but the opposite of feasting and joy.

i point it out to jews and they say "still because esther fasted in the first month therefore we must fast in the 12 month"- yet even the rabbis in mishna never established this fast-day for that reason nor any other!admittedly the jews rejoice and not the rest of us but i point out the trick to teenagers who are not even aware or are tricked into suffering for nothing. 

NEVER fast by date but rather at the time that you want to pray and then drink water because drinking water is needed every day! especialy if you think "a fast cleans" somehow, hence you need to rinse out with WATER!

summary of book of esther

instead of reading the whole book here is a summary

ester is divided into ten chapters the important issues are in the third chapter

before the the third chapter ester is appointed queen her name was hadasa 2.7 but she concealed her nation so she is called "ester" the hebrew for secret and we all forget her name. "2.7 he brought up Hadassah, that is, Esther, his uncle's daughter" then the king decreed 3.13 to slay=kill all the jews in his kingdom- because they have 3.8 a foreign religion. this is the most important part of the story because when a king decrees there is danger.

did the queen know? i am certain the queen knew! so i claim that chapter four is false and chauvinistic [2. Prejudiced belief in the superiority of one's own gender] and from a chauvinistic rabbi. so esther invited 5.4 the king to a feast- and when he came and said what is your request she said 5.8 i want you to come to a feast tomorrow.

chapter 6 distracts from the nation's danger by exagerating the importance of the honor of the man mordecai as if it deserves the same detail as saving the nation- as chapter 4 this again is bad and chauvinistic.

 the next day hadasa the queen 7.3 begged spare my life my nation is the one decreed and therefore the king punished 7 .10 his advisor and decreed that the jews should organize 8.11 and defend themselves.on the day that the jews were to be killed the jews defended against the enemy and had success- so the jews established a day of feast and joy.

sadly the rabbis reversed erasing the letter e! fast making suffering at a time of joy. they then obligated to drink too much wine  to the point of "interfering thought" gasp

this is what religious jews talk about luckily most jews are secular i understand why!

order

until now i added a section of summary each day so the new section is the one to read now i need to re-order it from the last so it will be read from the beginning to the end in the fortieth year

moses 5-4-3 deuteronomy 14 to end

moses 5-4-3 deuteronomy 14 to end

until now summarized harsh violence against pagans because god is very intolerant

more likely these repetitions of "destroying" which are incompatible to the ethics in chapter 5 are not from god and similarly any thing cruel is added by cruel rabbi and not from god including any possibility of cutting a baby anywhere with a knife and any other pain to babies and adults.

continue: dt.9 you get the land "because canan is evil". period- not because you are good because you are "stiff necked" note: not-good gets land, jew haters rejoice "not because you are good- see! jews are bad- hurray"- and those bad-jews GET land so cannot lose if bad! even the new testament said so in romans 9.9-11 "9 For this is the word of promise, At this time will I come, and Sara shall have a son. 10 And not only this; but when Rebecca also had conceived by one, even by our father Isaac; 11 For the children being not yet born, neither having done any good or evil, that the purpose of God according to election might stand, not of works, but of him that calleth"- does not depend on evil nor works- and again emphasized god promise is not dependant on law in galations 3.17 "That the covenant, that was confirmed before of God in Christ, the law, which was four hundred and thirty years after, cannot disannul, that it should make the promise of none effect. 18 For if the inheritance be of the law, it is no more of promise: but God gave it to Abraham by promise." not depend but a "promise" and through sara as mentioned above romans 9.9 and irrevocable in romans 11.28-29

see for yourself

http://www.kingjamesbibleonline.org/book.php?book=Galatians&chapter=3&verse=&t=1

who made the ark?
moses said god said make 10.1-3 a wood ark and "I made" in contrast to the plural verb in exodus these errors show not from god and no holy spirit to prevent errors but different human opinions in the same book. fear and 10.12 love god!
Circumcise therefore the foreskin of your heart- in 10.16 does that mean CUT?
http://www.mechon-mamre.org/p/pt/pt0510.htm
there is no excuse for the cruelty of cutting infants- and not in any place and worse the sensitive sex-organ.
again 11 love god and if you listen you will get 11.14 rain god never said DO he said "listen to the commands" studied no need to do- matching the limit "these" in the first year written in leviticus a limit established many decades before this fortieth year in the beginning of this book and by context 11.5
keep 11.8 the commands- a verb different than "do" in fact several traditions of even the "oral law" say this word means study and think. that is what is expected no need to do.
break 12.3 pagan altars and no OTHER 13.3 gods
however the punishment does not match the crime and is INCOMPATIBLE  with the ethics in deuteronomy 5 so we can identify this 13.10 corruption of justice and other killing of people who did not kill as from cruel anti-justice rabbis and not from god.

list of animals 14 to eat- repeating leviticus 11- positioned first or more likely this original with list of birds to eat and leviticus repeated. SO EAT ANIMALS- the eater of dead animal is simply eating- nothing immoral. if the process of cattle growth and slaughter needs improvement- accuse that phase. i know one guy who said "causing cows to mate is the same as rape" what do you think? regardless we only eat the meat and only after it is too late.

***the animal should be killed with less pain- my opinion is that a brutal hammer crushing the brain instantly seems instant and the same for death penalty of humans. if someone murders it seems the most painless punishment for the crime of murder. not slicing the throat and blood spraying and imagining that the animal feels nothing for the time as it dies- the way cruel rabbis explain "religious slaughter" my opinion is slaughter with a knife should be outlawed and those who do it should be punished with prison or sent to labour in the north dakota as slave labor for 24 months and if they repeat it longer.

but that is just me.

how are animals killed? a movie published that a pressurized can punches a steel cylinder into the brain of the unsuspecting cow- instant. the movie continues with the cow-worker using it on humans which is evil because the human was not convicted of the death penalty for murder. 

it would be justice for that murderer to be punished with the same instant death with the "cow puncher".

anyway that is painless and instant and unaware. and that is how we get meat and how others should too. if they only eat meat from cruel knife killing- and it is forbidden then they will not eat this meat and their preference is essentialy that THEY would be vegetarians- if they believe the meat is forbidden and choose to submit to heartless rabbis. or disobey and eat the meat like everyone else.

you 15.6 will rule many nations- not exactly fulfilled! israeli army has rebelled against this and every time it gets more land, it returns it, as it returned to syria much land and to egypt sinai and gaza to hamas. the west bank was not "returned" but granted to the authority of "palestinian authority" because the war is not to obey this verse but rather as defense. "quiet will be answered with silence" ***if the terrorists would stay home and watch TV there would be no need to shoot back.

!!

none 15.6 will rule you- gods plan is self-rule autonomy not fulfilled- until about 70 years ago. until then israel was ruled by everyone. holidays 16 are for killing animals and do not eat the passover with "sour" the word hamez means sour-dough from the root "sour" whose taste has changed to sour- no bread is like that and may be eaten according to gods law- with the passover and during the week but the jews do not notice this and think that all bread is forbidden and all flour and even many vegetables.  forbade "sour" hamaz like hamuz in taste- simon never said so you are out!

our bread HAS fungus "yeast" but the bible is forbidding "sour" dough bread.

so what is my point? OUR BREAD IS NOT SOUR so eat it- just eat it. as the song "so eat it- just eat it- eatit, eatit, eatit,eatit all you got to do is eatit!"

"it is not sour

go get a life

give some bread slices

to kids and your wife

just eat it- just eat it!

just eat it!"

feast of weeks and tents josepus preserved the jew-custom to "erect the tent in the house" which removes the excuse of apartment dwellers! the tradition is INDOORS and changing from that is "not jewish"

high 17.10 court at temple- not "obey any and every rabbi" nor "leader of the group" we are so accustomed to think each group is led by theirr rabbi that i must quote: "10 And thou shalt do according to the sentence, which they of that place which the LORD shall choose shall shew thee; and thou shalt observe to do according to all that they inform thee" note the word PLACE. outside of this place they lack authority and no command to submit. so if rabbis say "god said obey me" it is the same as a child saying "the kid rules the house because i say so". sure they quote the second half of this verse and the verse after it, misleading people who do not notice the word "place" which they did not mention- only for the sake of "brevity" not to lie? i wish the jews would see for themselves

http://www.kingjamesbibleonline.org/book.php?book=Deuteronomy&chapter=17&verse=&t=1

and even the hassidic website has the full quote and with hebrew

http://www.chabad.org/library/bible_cdo/aid/9981/jewish/Chapter-17.htm

a prophet 18.18 like mose will speak god's word. To him shall you listen! quote "18 I will raise them up a Prophet from among their brethren, like unto thee, and will put my words in his mouth; and he shall speak unto them all that I shall command him. 19 And it shall come to pass, that whosoever will not hearken unto my words which he shall speak in my name, I will require it of him." who is like moses? not isaiah nor jeremiah- even maimonides emphasized there is no prophet like moses- and if so the bible is false! god said that there is one like moses! more likely maimonides is false and this refers to jesus.

punish 19.11 murderers! who are you insisting to defend with mercy? a murderer? lawyers do it to claim this one is not the murderer, or to make money but once it is known- "mercy" is inappropriate or everyone will rely on no punishment and stab and shoot each other even more frequently!

quote: "11 But if any man hate his neighbour, and lie in wait for him, and rise up against him, and smite him mortally that he die, and fleeth into one of these cities: 12 Then the elders of his city shall send and fetch him thence, and deliver him into the hand of the avenger of blood, that he may die. 13 Thine eye shall not pity him, but thou shalt put away the guilt of innocent blood from Israel, that it may go well with thee." on who are you having mercy? punish the murderer. go well to prevent everyone murdering each other.

not by pushing off a roof like ISlamic state-terrorist-organization showed they did to men who lay with men! but with a punishment. did i mention instant brain crushing today?

stop laughing! murder is serious.

as the 45 minute session ends i accelerate

newly-weds 20.7 do not go to battle

the father 21.17 may not favor the son he wants but gives the double portion to the first born with objectivity he qualifies and gets it.

in summary of numbers we asked: what if a man sins with a married woman? and i explained that there is equality of man and women we see that here in 22.22 "22 If a man be found lying with a woman married to an husband, then they shall both of them die, both the man that lay with the woman, and the woman: so shalt thou put away evil from Israel." do not cheat on your wives! be loyal! or the man is punished the same as the woman. my opinion is the deat penalty is not justice for he did not kill but the lesson is what is important.
chapters 23-28 are various laws do not marry certain nations- these laws are in the fortieth year as the book deuteronomy began and therefore after the limit "these" of the first year as written in leviticus in the worship tent in the first year. means no commands so to read.
so varied it is difficult to summarise- if a man 24 divorces and she  marries another she may not return to the first. jesus said do not divorce- what god made one do not separate in instances of disagreement gods plan is the woman is "help" to advise and do what the man decides as a ahelp not to hinder! a HELP!
if "marital violation" divorce- that is not only sex but a woman who "does not help her husband in the mans decision" is a violation of "help" and should be divorced no need to pay her anything- simon never said and god never said in the section of divorce.
blessed 28 are those who obey, if not what is the punishment? death? no! god gives death is without covenant romans 5.14 all egyptians etc. die but covenant is hope for israel not hell-fire and not death of soul but pain in body "28.27 The LORD will smite thee with the botch of Egypt, and with the emerods [hemeroids?], and with the scab, and with the itch, whereof thou canst not be healed." i do not want to imagine what "THE" itch means. follow only god do not 29.18 stray after other gods. jesus quotes this idea in matthew 4 only god. 30.6 "the LORD thy God will circumcise thine heart, and the heart of thy seed, to love the LORD thy God with all thine heart, and with all thy soul, that thou mayest live." does that mean CUT the heart? so you will live! "circumcise" does not mean cut/incise/sciss+ors! but by context loving words like the hebrew root "word".

the book concludes with a song "moses wrote this song" implying moses did not write the book but said these words and a student wrote them and the song is harsh "they will sacrifice to devils and anger god" 32.17-19 but the english does not match the hebrew. "noz" means anger and the verbs are future.

moses blesses the tribes-
and goes up to heaven in a flaming chariot? oops wrong story.
it took me eleven minutes to read this summary.

NOTE: having seen the content we see many evil values to note and avoid teaching and defending
I hope this summary will help people know what is in the book and only later look up what i suggest to read later and not read the actual books of moses with bad evil values- certainly not for kids and even adults only if they are critical of the contents.

moses 5-4-3 deuteronomy 7

moses 5-4-3 deuteronomy 7

until now summarized moses retelling [dt 1-4] events written in previous books- yet perhaps telling for the first time: sending spies and victories in battle which those books positioned first are expanding on, and actually this story was written first. do not add! any law nor prohibition nor action added. decalog and love god.

continue: what is more important the decalog or love god?

Though the most important ideas in this book are the ten-words decalog it is not because "prohibited to kill" is important, as explained below but because jesus mentioned them honor parents and others. in addition loving god is even more important than these. jesus said love for god and man are the most important even more than the other ones he mentioned in the decalog.

we proceed with violence 7 to pagans- god is so intolerant!

in this context: saying "do not murder" in deuteronomy 5, is not "morality" because the system contains the cruel violence of this chapter! and cruel harmful death penalties by stones in numbers which i edited out and did not include as well as later in deuteronomy.

do not give your son nor your daughter to marry a pagan.

why? because "your son will be led to idol" if so a daughter can marry?

unless male grammar includes feminine and in hebrew grammar it does include both "hem" for a bi-gender group as well as for objects which traditionaly are treated as gender such as "hem" for a door and window of different genders. male includes so the concern is for both a son and daughter by the context of forbidding both.

the grandson is not a concern, according to bible whether ma is jew- still child not as we see in leviticus by the "son of the egyptian man" despite his mother being israelite this was not enough and he is incomplete until both parents are jewish BOTH and the rabbis who say depends on "mother" rebel against the word of god- and hence no concern if non-israelite grandson follows idols- not sin only isrel commanded no idols in dt 5. and noah commanded about eating blood in genesis [but not seven] and never commanded about idols and unnecessary to mention son of son who married pagan woman because the concern is for "your" child the one forbidden in verse before "your"

in gods plan only if both parents are israelites then the child is israelite because the father is part of the equation and only israelite if both parents are israel. if not they are free from the rules and this is why they needed to imprison in  leviticus because he was not a full israelite. the death penalty shows that a gentile gets death penalty which is in talmud regardless. this biblical lesson conflicts do not murder and is not from god and any bodily punishment is INCOMPATIBLE with the decalog and recognizable as added by unethical cruel people. these five books must be recognized as not morally acceptable and incompatible with a justice-ly just god and must not be included as "holy" books only this summary will tell what is in those evil cruel books which must be recognized as evil and cruel- not to be read by anyone as religious instruction because of the many corruptions of justice to kill a sinner who did not kill and to hit a sinner that did not hit another's body.

these books are not holy and must not be in a collection of holy books and knowing what is inside for religious purposes should be by reading this summary only. 

only adults studying critically may be exposed to these bad ideas NOT religious style "accept and defend whatever" is claimed to be from god.

you 8.3 were hungry "He humbled you, causing you to hunger and then feeding you with manna, which neither you nor your ancestors had known, to teach you that man does not live on bread alone but on every word that comes from the mouth of the Lord. " note: the word humble matching exodus chapter ten and the same word on the day of atonement is humble by feeding manna it does not mean "prohibit food" that is a rabbinic lie! but humble like in exodus 10. the word here for hunger is not used by day of atonement and that day is to submit that we all need atonement.

in matthew 4 jesus quotes this idea when satan said make a stone bread- what did they mean? in the context of desert bread jesus was saying "i do not need to turn a stone into bread because god will give me what i need" and he DID need in the book of mark "jesus was hungry" and in the book of john "jesus was thirsty" the same as us humans compare collosians 1.19 "dwell in body" and matches that body hunger and thirst and submit to god and "separate" will and desire of body.

god warns: do not say 9.4 to yourself, “The Lord has brought me here to take possession of this land because of my righteousness.” 

this has two sides one: do not think this proves you are good and two: it is not because nor depend on your actions! not because of righteousness and that means sinners STAY as continues "No, it is on account of the wickedness of these nations that the Lord is going to drive them out before you. 5 It is not because of your righteousness or your integrity that you are going in to take possession of their land; but on account of the wickedness of these nations, the Lord your God will drive them out before you, to accomplish what he swore to your fathers, to Abraham, Isaac and Jacob" note to accomplish the PROMISE through sara and even the new testament said:" that promise is a gift not depending on obeying god and is irrevocable". even sin it is irrevocable in romans 11.28-29 and beloved for fathers.

but if the jews get land, what happens to a gentile born in israel? luckily the israeli government grants citizenship to non-jews born in israel [in contrast with jordan births in refugee areas] with equal privilege to vote and be part of the government and many arabs are members of the israeli parliament in contrast to israel's neighboring countries- and the unequal criticism is noticeable in this as well- when people challenge equality by complaining about the jews for details which the neighbors also violate, but are not criticised for because only the jew is hated enough for the effort to complain and criticize while the neighbors are "good" with same flaw and more flaws for example israel's neighbors do not have jews in government- a fact which nobody complains about.

many countries have laws of "return" and jordan explicitly denied "jews to return" despite birth in jordan and nobody except lawyers are  even aware nor mention nor complain about this racism and other nations laws of return and only complaining about  "those racist jews"  a stricter unequal standard to criticize the israeli law of return which in fact is the same as european countries such as germany and as lawyers point out when accused.

if israel sins what happens? they do not lose land? correct the punishment is something else 11.17 NO RAIN

and body suffer. again 11.13-14 LOVE GOD repeated many times in this book and for sin pain of body is the punishment. this is the covenant of moses.

is sin "hell" fires ro death? the punishment is something else and saying jews go to hell-fire is baseless that is not the contract.

break 12.3 pagan altars etc. and only 13.4 obey god- obeying na dwe learn that moses prayed and did not get what he prayed for this is a lesson of prayer - gods plan and will not change by prayer- do not ask for what "i want" 

enough for today!

moses 5-4-3 deuteronomy 5

moses 5-4-3 deuteronmy 5

until now summarised moses retold sending spies to canan and of wars 1,2,3 and warns 4 do not add

that means no new ceremonies of rabbis it was a sin for the rabbis to add any act and prohibition and to obey the rabbis is rebel against god who said NO ADD

chapter 5: the DECALOG 

dec+log dec is ten+log is word ten words like december is the tenth month- huh

oh it was tenth month from march or before july and august were added and dec like decimal tenths

dec+log is ten words

these commands are mentioned by jesus and not counting the decalogue he quotes from deuteronomy more than any other book

statistics

*from genesis 2 two verses made male and female+the two become one

*from exodus decalog plus three unless the quotes of decalogue and eye are quoted from deuteronomy 5+19.21 and not from exodus because moses went up in chapter 19 and at the latest 20.21 and could not command chapter 21 to israel at the time, even curse in chapter 21 is the same problem  unless jesus quoted from Leviticus 20.9 which is possible and more likely.

*leviticus: 2 love near person, and do not curse parents

*numbers zero and even johns quote of no break bone is about messiah a quote from psalms and not from numbers and the footnote is unacceptable and influenced by the date

*dueteronomy decalog+7! the most quotes are from this 

jesus explicitly said: honor father and mother, no: kill, relations, theft, false-witness.

in different words jesus also said "no other gods" also from decalog in matthew 4.10=6.13 and john 10.30 and john 17 "you are only true god" with greek word "mono" only one! used elsewhere in greek for "only"

LOVE GOD 6.5 and repeated many times in this book quoted by jesus as the greatest command 

love god with "mind" hebrew "lb" in this context is mind not cardio! so the fourth in new testament is good

israeli politicians work together

although the political parties of "merez" and "torah judaism" are very different, they agreed to work together on two new laws in december 2014
one law: that banks cannot refuse to open a bank account for a political party
problem of equality: despite that banks can and do refuse to open accounts for private people, a choice called "autonomy and self-determination" yet this law that benefits both politicians and gives=grants greater privilege than the average citizen, for this corruption of justice and of equality which challenges the autonomy of a bank- they worked together
second law: to grant citizenship to dead people
GASP
who died over sixty years ago
GASP
for a dead person should be granted citizenship seems stupid and shows the corrupt priorities of politicians
does it add to the number of "jews" in palestine at the time of the war of independence
?
of course not! the jew is counted even without citizenship
despite the dreadful content of these laws, considering that one challenges equality and the autonomy of banks and the other for the stupid citizenship- at least they bridged their differences and worked together 

moses 5-4-3 deuteronomy

moses 5-4-3 continued

deuteronomy

the book of deuteronomy seems to repeat many things from previous books but it is probable that this is the first book written earliest and alone, and later other writers repeated its ideas and added to them in separate books which were located first because of starting with creation, and deuteronomy postioned fifth. it mentions the fear of god many times and also to love god many times

if love is a feeling of wanting to be near someone, then we should want the nearness of god.

the book begins as if moses was not writing but another person reporting "these are the words of moses" and defining the pronoun "I" in verse nine "i said" as moses saying I, when he speaks. this matches that "moses wrote this song" chapter 31.22, the song was written by moses and another assembled what moses wrote while writing what moses said, specifying that moses was the one who spoke.

the claim that the bible was written by moses himself [in josepus to genesis 2 and later rabbis] does not match and is incompatible with the wording throughout the book that only here moses said "i" and not elsewhere and even the i is defined by another writer as referring to moses

also the words "moses wrote this song" 31.22 are not needed if we [or the writer] believe the "theological claim" that all was written by moses, it is extra and superfluous to say a certain part was by moses unless we reject the assumption and only know that a part which is explicitly claimed to be "by moses" that is the song, is by moses and the rest written by a non-prophet, probably in the time of second temple as paul johnson wrote in 'history of the jews' the "second half of the first millenia BC" which means after 500 bc between 500 and 200 bc

jesus quotes the most from this book even if we deduct the quotes from the decalogue as exodus the remaining quotes from deuteronomy are more than the quotes of exodus and the two of leviicus especialy if jesus quoted the decologue of deuteronomy. jesus quotes nothing from numbers. even the quote "no broken bone" is closer to the prophecy of messiah in psalms and the footnote to numbers is in error resulting from the date misleading someone to direct the reader to numbers when in fact the idea is the idea of messiah in pslams and in fact the wording is the same wording as psalms and not a quote from numbers. anothe rflaw is that nimbers adds a story about talking to a rock that josps does not have josps tells of miriam's death but numbers adds to that section about a rock and this indicates it is a man made book written after josepus.

josepus does have the story water from a rock of hitting the rock in exodus 17.6 and if we see moses go up in chapter 19 the next thing we see is when moses comes down and there should be nothing between chapter 19 and the end of exodus 34 and in the original they were near each other but later writers changed the content to "make the teaching big" in isaiah- in which case the decalogue appeared once only and that is in deuteronomy.

moses 1.22 retells the sending of spies and the 2.24 war against amorites and 3.3 bashan.

we are warned 4.2 NO ADD to what i command "you shall not add" but rabbis do not obey god and add numerous new ceremonies: search for leaven bread and more, rebelling against god just as much as those who "subtract" commands such as secular or pagan- the rabbis are the same and even worse because FIRST is the warning do not add. the claim "secular subtract from law" is only a distraction and FIRST is the warning not to add with priority and also using this distraction shows that they have no excuse for adding which they do and "not subtracting" cannot mean "instead add" after the warning "no add"

imagine gandalf standing facing the great monster and shouting "YOU SHALL NOT PASS" [fellowship of the ring part one and repeated in beginning of part 2] with the word "add" instead of pass!

the rabbis lead the jews to rebel against gods warnings here.

the secular jews who do nothing are actualy obeying god not to ADD by not doing any additions!

the idea of "do not add" is repeating as a prohibition-form which specifies the same idea before in leviticus 26 "these" are commands, these- limiting from the end of leviticus no additional command and the idea is now repeated in deuteronomy 4.2 you shall not add any new ceremony nor any new prohibition.

the decalogue 5 deserves attention so that will be next especialy if it is the only appearance of the decalogue in the original pre-corruption bible.

moses 5-4-3 numbers 16

moses 5-4-3 continued

numbers continued

until now summarized: counted the israelites, assigned the service of levites, some laws to read and sent spies. 

korah 16 and many challenge the leadership of aron wanting to replace aron as priest, but god 16.35 punished the 250 challengers. [how? killed in fire- later see previous post "no proportion" if you can stomach reading  bodily punishment.]

god also performed miracles showing the selection of aron as priest: the staff 17.8 of aron sprouted budded blossomed . once the nations doubts were removed they were instructed 18.12 to give to god and god gave to the family of aron the first of oil wine and grain given to god- by giving to 18.8 aron's sons.

if someone 19.11 touches "nps adam"  the dead soul-

wait! is the soul something someone can touch? a soul is spiritual and cannot die! nor be touched!

the hebrew word nps is a body that can die and be touched. god breathed into adam and made him "nps" this same term here and as animals. "our form" is unique to human but adam lost that.

back to numbers: if one touches 19.12 the corpse must clean with water. as mentioned, from the end of leviticus no command by the limit "these" and even talmud agrees it is a limit no new law from "now" the word "these" in leviticus 26, therefore this can only be a symbol because it is not a command. symbol for what?

symbol of dead faith needing water- water means "the word of god" john 4, defining "born of water" near it in john 3.

moses hit 20.11 the rock twice and water flow. in 20.2 there was no water because 20.1 "first month" this tells what occurred earlier before the event in exodus 17.6 yet miriam died now- in the first month-  if so when was she a leper  numbers 12?  between miriam sing exodus 15.20 and the end of the first month.

snakes attacked and 21.6 bit and many israelite die. god said 21.8 make a snake on a pole.

balaam 22-24 comes to curse israel- and abraham was told "all who curse israel will be cursed" israel through sara in romans 9.7-9,  and cursed means by god- is it worth it?

none of the four speeches in numbers match the parallel speeches in josepus except 2 details in the last speech which coincide in these sources.

we can be confident that numbers what we call numbers is not the original prophetic book which explains the problem above of the story of miriam because the book is man and therefore flawed.

moabite women 25.1-2 invite to bow to idols  and god hit israel with a plague- the law of moses is justly called "the law of death" as we see here. count 26=chapter 26, the israelites and moses appointed 27.18 joshua leader before death and all saw- the assembly saw and know who the leader chose to lead after. this prevents division.

laws of sacrifices to read 28-29 because "these" are commands and no new from leviticus. daily lambs and of sabath and new moon and holidays.

a father can 30.5 cancel the vow of a daughter. war 31.3 against midian  some accuse jews of killing people for land- although joshua did that according to bible- recent history has jew giving away land gaza and sinai peninsula and other instances- the opposite of taking- giving this has happened in our century and gave gaza in the new 21st century. what effect? the rocket launchers were moved closer and no peace for land. this midian war was not for land.

2 tribes ask 32.5 for land east of the jordan and god tells 34 the border approves-

note the north border until lebo hamat calld "city hama" -"Hama is a city on the banks of the Orontes River in west-central Syria. It is located 213 kilometres north of Damascus and 46 kilometres north of Homs." yes gods plan is north of damascus

this is gds plan yet the israeli army isnot trying to take this land until the north border north of hama.

we conclude the summary of numbers with the list of places the israelites 33 travel and that daughters can inherit but then only marry the same tribe- resulting in the rabbis saying when they cannot marry the same tribe daughters cannot inherit.

no perspective

we westerners have "lost all perspective" led by a media of western values that "blows things way out of proportion" we measure "moral" by harm and pain-

except we ignore the immoral cruel pain of infant circumcision-
because that is "common"

??

we think and are told that it is unspeakably-dreadful to:

cut off a pilots limbs

unspeakably-dreadful to hang someone to death

and unspeakably-dreadful to burn someone in a cage

if we define moral as "no harm and no pain" then there is no difference and any pain and harm is immoral and a court may not do what is immoral.

other cultures do have bodily punishment.

before we announce confidently "burning a pilot in a cage  is an irrational corruption of justice" we must realize that we are skipping a step.

the problem is not irrational- the problem is something else.

but it is complex so most people miss the point but you are intelligent to comprehend if you have not stopped reading by the sixth line

1 first: bodily punishment is not unique to Islamic state organization="dos-" for brevity

moses spoke of the same punishment as burning a pilot with a frightening difference

"the sinners shall be burned in fire him and them" the words "in a fire" can be translated "kill by fire" almost the same- and they are the same as what dos- did to the pilot kill by fire. the only difference is that the pilot dropped bombs that "burned people in fire" this distinction is pure unemotional logic that any pure blooded "vulcan" of unemotional logic and maybe even "spock" would admit is logic and precise justice.

it is rational to punish one "who kills by fire" with the precise punishment "killing by fire" and precise justice- the problem is something else-

the problem is what the islamic university in egypt pointed out [al azhar] the decision to punish a pilot who dropped bombs that burn- has defined killing by fire as a crime and may not do that same act which is defined as "crime" therefore the islamic justice is that those judges and executioners who did the non-islamic punishment deserve an islamic punishment: "death or cutting off limbs"

this is the justice of those muslims who protest the extremists of islamic state organization. the moderate muslims who have justice of death or cutting off limbs that is moderate islam of those who protest dos-

logic results in the comprehension that IF dos- had not wanted "unemotional justice" of fire-for-fire-

but had decided "we will show mercy and spare the pilots life and ONLY cut off his limbs" that would be fine and good with no complaint from the islamic university in egypt- because it is "islamic justice" and even merciful to return the pilot limbless to his family.

how do you feel when you read that? do you understand what moderate islam is? as westerners the problem is that the court cannot do a punishment that is immoral.

similarly jordanians complained that those who burned the pilot in fire  are not islam and deserve to be hanged by islamic justice-

that is islamic justice- to kill by hangingץ

the same approach there would be no complaint if dos- had hung the pilot to death because that is islamic justice.

that is the moderate islam that protests the extreme for being "unislamic"

the mishna of rabbinic judaism is approximately the same- i do not know which is "more immoral" so you can choose-

instead of the words of moses "kill by fire and kill in fire" which mean the sinner is "in" the fire the rabbis write in mishna that "fire in the sinner" fulfills-

pouring molten hot metal in the sinner fulfills.

there is an aspect of "not fitting the crime" that a sin of fornication did not kill anyone in fire in contrast to dos- which deserves mention in burning a pilot who burned in fire. the problem is something else- not the corruption of justice- the issue is that the judge had done what the judge had defined as a crime.

the rabbis defend the mishna because that is the "will of god and god defines what is truly moral" in leviticus 20.14

??

instead of moral meaning "no harm and no pain"

the mishna also has "pushing men who lay with men from the roof" when i read that dos- published a video that they did precisely that-

i thought they had converted to rabbinic judaism-

but now they burnt a pilot so it is something else-

jordan says what they did is inislamic and they are "not muslim" using the words "devil/satan"

but if we know that moses said to kill by fire or burn "in a fire"-

i ask: is burning a sinner in a fire satanic of the devil? or from the god of israel in leviticus?

or is the bible not entirely from god but contains additions from cruel religious leaders? i can only hope god didnot command those things in leviticus and numbers- and i am the one writing a summary of moses but these things must be censored out.

in summary the judges of dos- have been criticised and those who protest define the islamic punishments of cutting off limbs-

those are the moderates who protest the extremists with words of protest- and say what islam is- and we can understand that it would be "merciful" to spare the pilots life- ONLY cut off his limbs and then return the pilot to his family- that would be fina and good and merciful and islamic justice.

unless there is "robocop" technology- then the pilot is still a danger after removing limbs- and must be killed somehow- maybe a painless injection?

the issue is: what is against morality- that is the issue

doing harm and pain is immoral and against the values of morality-

that is the issue

and that applies to many more situations than pushing a man who slept with a man from the roof

we should start by protecting infants from the immoral cruel pain of infant circumcision.

moses 5-4-3 numbers

moses 5-4-3 continued

session 3

numbers has many stories!

counted 1-3 the nation and levites and grouped the tribes. the work 4 of levites is defined who carries utensils curtains and wood frames. if a man is 5 jealous and suspects his wife, there is a test she drinks ceremonial water and when nothing happens- he should stop suspecting and they "live happily ever after". this is a solution for jealousy. if witnesses see her lay or him lay with a married woman, we will see in deuteronomy what happens josepus calls it a "capital crime" or we can watch "islamic state organization" broadcasts- it is the same. i hope the muslims at least require witnesses and suspicion not enuf. without witnesses, like the movie "intolerable cruelty" suspicion is nothing as "miles massey" explains and moses too provides a ceremony to calm the jealous men. what about jealous wives who see their husbands eyes looking at other woman? no need for a ceremony, woman must trust their husbands. if there are witnesses men are punished too with equal punishment but only if the woman is married in contrast to married women with any man.

recently israeli politicians tried to pass a law that included the idea that traditional jew-law should be a source for israeli law- considering the numerous death penalties for sins other than murder and physical beatings and cancelling ownership of sinners property [hoshen mishpat 2]- there is cause for rejoice that the law did not pass and scary to think politicians in israel want a system that includes these and the horrors that "islamic sate organization" sets an example to do. jew tradition has some scary stuff that seem in our culture unjust and out of proportion to the crime.

despite my criticism i am not claiming it is "the most horrible system" research pakistani rape laws and see for yourself i cannot forget how those men accused of laying with men were pushed off a roof. oh jew-mishna has that one too. yikes.

the vow 6 no fermented drink in the time-span of vow. the leaders 7 offered gifts to god at the worship tent josepus locates this with the inaugeration=start-ceremony of priests. the details of the gift are concise and once in josepus but to "make the teacing big" isaiah numbers-book repeats all the details of six long verses twelve times. it is easy reading for kids but to hear it twelve times? no comment.

sprinkle water on 8.7 levites. at night 9.15 a fire was over the tent of worship. moses 10 made 2 silver trumpets. then numbers 11 repeats exodus 16 bird meat  in 11.31. moses is a "nearer to god" 12.8 prophet than other prophets.

israelites send spies to see canaan. one from each tribe. they return and say "impossible" to fight cnan. we cant do it. the nation lacked faith. josepus does not hide israels sins which causes the question why does exodus have a sin that josepus does not have? answer: it was not in the original holy-book. moses went up in 19.2 and came "down after 40" as josepus quotes in parallel to 34. nothing should be between 19.2 and the end of chapter 34. those days were uneventful days.

it never occurred but later the false-written-story was copied into the masoretic text.

this lack of faith followed the majority. sometimes follow god against majority as even talmud in brakot said: follow gamliel against majority. a majority is not always correct tho it is likely if they studied the issue. the spies 14.36 were struck by a plague and the next morning  they repented and said we sinned and moses said 14.42 "do not go" but they disobeyed the prophet and 14.45 were struck "Then the Amalekite and the Canaanite, who dwelt in that hill-country, came down, and smote them and beat them down" next story the rebellion of korah.

moses 5-4-3 leviticus 23

moses 5-4-3 continued 

leviticus 23

until now: exodus chapters 1-12 mostly tell of the ten punishments on egypt for enslaving israelites as explained to abraam from the beginning "also the nation that enslaves them i will judge", 12-25 tell israelites exit=exodus egypt and go through sea to the desert and 25-40 tell about the wood tent and its utensils, with much repeating. leviticus 1-7 tells of the types of sacrafice "up" and flour and peace and sin and thank, 8-25 are varied laws summarised in the previous post until 26 however the holy days deserve attention.

josepus begins his parallel of leviticus with a detailed summary of the sacrifices whose details are repeated numerous times in leviticus and scattered to "make big the teaching" @isaiah and burden the readers with extra words. following the sacrifices are the holidays which are all dates for sacrifice except one: "the law demands we" erect tent in the house on the 15 day of the seventh lunar month.

note that in josepus the months are lunar by the moon cycle of new moon also note he includes himself "enjoins us demands we" and that this is a command- like the "taking in the hand of a fruit and three types of branches"- from the law, in contrast to other customs in that section that are mere customs. josepus blends together the content scattered in leviticus 16 and 23 and numbers 28-29 together in the form a wise god commanded- preserving the original which rabbis ruined scattering the details with burdensome repititions for the goal of "make big the teaching"as above.

josepus located the holy days=holidays 23 near the sin sacrifice of chapter 4! and only a few details of these 19 chapters are in his parallel book. josepus pledged to fill in what is missing and keeps his commitment by including a few more details with the laws in his parallel of deuteronomy preserving the original prophecy before the rabbis added vast amounts of laws which fill what we call chapters 8-23 of leviticus. as we learned from aarons sons god hates additions it is hard to distinguish and i might have included something not divine by mistake in my summary of leviticus, much is not the original prophecy from god.

the holy days: weekly sabat and holidays are all to kill animals like the new-moon-day numbers 28.11 josepus adds passover is the beginning of the jew-year. about yom kipur day of atonement the law said "initem" like exodus 10.3 submit to god that we need atonement unlike some people feel guilty in a way that interferes with function and that is not the idea "we need atonement" nor those who say "i am good enough" in fact for gods glory we all need atonement and we are commanded "initem" submit and say to god "you say i need atonement so i need." no command "thou shalt not eat" nor the positive command in ester "fast all for me" it is absent and when we see they fasting we recognize a baseless rabbinic burden. sadly no jew who fasts noticed that the word "initem" is not only different from ester but also is like exodus 10.3 as mentioned. i told a jew it means "submit" and he responded "submit by fasting" however that is baseless- absent a need for fasting and the context is "submit to atonement" and god hates those who add as we learn from the sons of aron "what god did not command them". i think the absence of sacrifices cause the jews to fast- they know without sacrifice they are doomed- so they try hunger, in contrast to the jew-talmud-story of one who sinned on sabat and he wrote he will bring a sin offering when the temple is built- that is the jew-tradition! not to burden people with a fast that god never commanded clearly. 8 year olds want to fast like the adults and are told to eat and that is good but then they fast the first time and realize how hard it is- not noting that what ester said "zumu" was never commanded for this date. sadly they suffer for nothing not for god because "simon never said so you are out" and actualy enrage god with the addition.

that summarizes the holidays all for killing animals- except the "tent in the house" and the fruit and branches in the hand- on the first day according to levitiucs i do not know any jew that obeys this without adding more days than god comanded. they even bles "you god commanded us" and do not even notice that the rabbis added it and god hates those who add.

chapters 24-25 are varied laws  26 clarifies the covenant of moses- if you disobey god- body suffers like deuteronomy 6. this is a great gift according to new testament romans 5.14 without covenant "death reigned" on everyone and ephesians 2.12-15 "no hope" so moses bring a great gift from god to israel- not excluding gentiles as ruth joined, but given to those "beloved for their ancestors" romans 11.28-29 and for example egyptians at the time of moses are like all before moses: no hope and did not even want. in contrast the law gave acts to do for hope. sin brought pain to body and no rain, instead of death. another item unnoticed "these commands" in leviticus 26 has been interpreted in oral tradition as a limit! GASP no more commands or anything from this limit! the only commands to do are until this limit: like the holidays but no more commands from this point. what follows is only to read including reading the word "do" in numbers. in conflict with this tradition, jews insist on doing even what is after this limit "these" i informed orthodox rabbis and reform rabbis of this oral tradition but i saw that god was corect in calling them "a stiff necked nation" even when it requires denying oral tradition. do+do+do. see for yourself talmud mgila 2b and sabat104a on leviticus "these". any law after this point is excluded from commands and was written to read not a command to do. both based on the text "these" and the specific oral tradition. no prayer shawl before this point means...

no prayer shawl. leviticus concludes with more varied ideas to read but excluded from comands.

end session 2

moses 5-4-3 leviticus

moses 5-4-3 continued

session 2 continued

part 2 leviticus

until now summarized genesis and exodus 42000 words of 92000 and a long way to go!

leviticus begins with six chapters about sacrifices- with details of the same sacrifice written separately from each other. i wonder of josepus fixed in response to the flawed original or "leviticus" was stretched from the original with repetitions. the volume of repetitions is so great i believe that the original, as god wanted it written, was preserved in josepus and the rabbis stretched it with extra words and repetitions to fulfill "make the teaching big" in isaiah 42.21

there are many types of sacrifices: "up" and flour, peace and sin 1-6 also 7.12 a thank-sacrifice. the sacrifices kill:

cows or sheep and-

birds or wheat- that rhymes sort of. the ceremony 8 [repeating exodus 29] for appointing the family of priests is significantly different from the parallel in josepus. aron 9.22 blessed everyone with the a priestly blessing.

arons sons offered a "gift" something 10.1 "not commanded". they thought god would like their "initiative" as a gift but god called it "foreign"and sons died- how? i censor. no pictures kiddies.

is this book really fit for children to read? i doubt it! 

we know enough to limit videos to certain ages and many of the stories in the bible should not be read to children under age 14 at least.

bibles should come with warnings like computer games- that would warn parents to protect the youngsters and also serve to make it cool enough for teenagers!

or they can read this summary.

the lesson of this story is DO NOT ADD!! 

the sons of aron added something original with good intentions to give to god but god does not want additions and punished them with death as a warning that we should not add any ceremony unless god says so. that means do not listen to rabbis who add ceremonies for passover even if they say "i say that god said you must obey me" or wrote it in mishna- because god showed his wrath on those who add-

those who add any act or "sin" prohibition, that god "did not command" like 10.1, for example the search for leaven for passover- we know what awaits them on judgement day.

moses explains which animals 11 to eat [and although not written i am certain that the vegetarians left this lecture as a protest]. when a child is born 12.4 keep away from the holy tent- but come later with a sacrifice. chapters 13-14 are the laws of "discolorations". chapter fifteen is very personal and parents can explain it as they want. the religious jews have a rule about menstruation which conflicts this chapter- in which not only is a command to prohibit relations with a menstruant absent, but also the result IS "he is like her" and both stay away far from the holy tent until later. no punishment results and no death penalty in contrast to the mishna kritut. no command for her to wash in a ritual bath, and as we learn from aaron's sons: god hates those who ADD. especially if the change is used to collect monthly fees at the ritual bath.

ceremonies for the 16 day of atonement- to clean sins with 17.11 blood . redeem=kapar.

what follows is a frightening mistranslation in chapter 18.

only one instance has the word "lay" in this list of laws. to claim this is a list of laws forbidding "lay" with a relative is baseless and inaccurate because only 18.22 has this verb: lay. others are something else. what? the hebrew word "tgala" and "erwa" both mean reveal according to oral law in radak, "do not reveal what she reveals" seems like violating the trust of a relative to "come close to reveal what she reveals" in trust.

the only command on this list with laying is for man laying with man, with gods opinion of this act. because of legal limitations i may only quote gods opinion as translated in kjv "Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is abomination." god is so "intolerant". next-  the greatest command must be emphasized "love thy fellow"19.18, even if he sins and even if he lays with men we must be tolerant, and not judge nor condemn and leave the judging for god. i still would tell my son not to do it, and to anyone who asks me, but nobody asked me!

more laws 20-25 so varied it is difficult to summarize jesus emphasized two commands in leviticus so they are worth singling out: love thy fellow and  "For every one that curseth his father or his mother shall be surely put to death" by who? by god of course! for a human to judge would be murder and the wording is "be put to death" no command for anyone to execute the sinner. it is repeating exodus 21.17 which might not truly be part of exodus. before we end session 2 we must analyze the holidays in chapter 23. in the next part.

footnote: if i were obsessed i would talk about circumcision here too because in leviticus 12  the word appears yet again but i wrote enuf about it already, so i only point out what is absent: the place to cut, and the word "cut" and the word "skin" which will appear soon after by skin discolorations.

moses 5-4-3 exodus

moses 5-4-3 continued
session 2 of 4 continued=session 1 of exodus
until now: summarised exodus begins with: the birth of moses [2=chapter2] and israelites were slaves 1 then moses saw the "bush" [mark 12.26 please compare later] which 3.2 did NOT burn but was fiery [not a burning bush!]. moses returned to egypt and 4.30 did signs for israelites and then they believed. moses said the king should free israelites but king said 5.7 work harder. five minutes behind scedule so quick without details:
***God comforts 6.1 "with a strong hand i will free" and fufills by: god hit egypt with BLOOD: water changed 7.20 to blood. bible said blood- not red algeas and not red volcano dust or anything! ONLY if god does not exist we need such explanations for the atheists- however according to bible god does exist so prophet knew blood. the blood did NOT cause frogs to scatter away from blood because 7.25 frogs are LATER not the same time as blood.
the fish died therefore even as new water flowed in the river, egyptians could not drink 7.24 "water" because of the dead fish. egyptian magician  took "water"  of 7.24 and 7.22 made it blood so paro said magic not god. [i need to write a song using the rhyme egyptian magician]
for egyptian magic we can say they moved "red algea" into the water.
God sent 8.6 frogs and 9.10 boils and more until 10.11 paro compromised [i wish i could compare josepus version of compromise because it is different but no time now] men go, which is not god's plan so moses 11.5 warns death of the first-born sons.
whoo- now i can slow the pace.
I rely on the fact that chapters 20-31 are many laws and that 4 of those chapters are completely repeated a bit later.
god commanded 12.3 take a lamb and put blood on sides and top of doors. do not cook it in water only over a fire- barbecue [bar+B+Q]. remember this day 12.14 forever. forever?
is this extra? if word of god permanent, it seems extra to say for certain details "forever" or for "generations" rabbinic commentaries are disturbed by this extra word-
and said "without the word 'generations' the command is one generation"
GASP
that means although the promise of god is irrevocable, gods plan is not to serve by actions- and this is why the commands only have the word generations by certain details. based on text itself it is not extra but rather distinguishes which details are to be repeated in future years- certain ones are for generations, however to say all are "for generations" is baseless and even rabbis who say "do+do+do" admit that this is not god's plan. one commentator adds "generations" means two generations only, until it said "forever with generations". quite a surprise- but that is the tradition of "grab the minimum" in jew-oral tradition.  if so the study of the bible is not for instructions to act, except the few specified forever.
if so the commands of passover are for one or two generations according to oral tradition and text and rabbinic comments too, so no need for jew to do all the details beside the details which are specified as generations. this matches paul saying 2 cor. 3.7-11 [please check later] the law of moses even what was on stone fades away and hebrew translators used the word "btl" there, which means cancelled. only the few exceptions such as 'ushmartem" which means remember [as written in many jewish books talmud psahim "think", rashi deuteronomy "study" and ramban on exodus 20 remember in thought" and more] remember forever.
this matches jeremiah 31.31-33 a new covenant "inside" inside fulfills and no need for ritual ceremonies- "different" from previous "not like" because "inside" fulfills when is new covenant? a covenant with god needs blood exodus 24 [not summarized see below]. regardless it matches and the rituals are not for repeating after moses.
jesus' death is connected to the passover and the day is remembered forever among jews and everyone so the prophecy of forever is fulfilled as well.
moses repeats god's instructions but not exactly! he tells different details not saying some of what god told him and adding details 12.22 apply blood with hysop- an addition "Take a bunch of hyssop, dip it into the blood in the basin and put some of the blood on the top and on both sides of the doorframe" to clarify how to do what god said practically. it is "how" to put blood not a new "action" added. note the change in order! although god said "sides and top" quoted above, moses said "top and sides" and wrote both to teach that even in the moses generation of "do" it was not legalistc even under law! the order is not important and other legalistic "doubts" can be shrugged off as "all are fine" without a cynical tone of voice i joke "when a religious jew goes to a church he asks "which should i hold in my right hand the communion bread or wine" moses was clear about not being so legalistic even under the law. i wonder what would happen if religious jewish teenagers would notice the commentary about "generations" that even the rabbis wrote. they might start doing communion?
they travelled and by night 13.21 a pillar of fire led them. i wonder what those who said "blood was red algea" would say about a pillar of fire leading the israelites at night- a moving bonfire as a pillar.
exodus 14.21 "21 Then Moses stretched out his hand over the sea, and all that night the Lord drove the sea back with a strong east wind and turned it into dry land. The waters were divided, 22 and the Israelites went through the sea on dry ground, with a wall of water on their right and on their left."
the egyptians saw the wind and were fooled that it was not god- many readers are fooled too- and say god did not do anything supernatural the wind did it and moses was a great meteorologist leading them on schedule.
whatever! or in slang "whatev's"
then moses sang a 15 song and the hebrew of the song is different and so estimated as older than the hebrew around it. it seems the song was sung and transmitted generations before the rest of the story was written and the song inserted. one key difference is the past form of grammar. "amar" past of said "amar" so different from the frequent "vayomer" same meaning.
israelites were supplied by 16.13-15 birds and desert bread and 17.6 water to drink.jethro visits. i seem to remember that moses wife came with moses to egypt so how she came now with her father bothers bible critics. her father has a different name? the names were both in chapter 3.1 jethro but 2.18 ruel.
if my wife cut my son i would send her to her father- at least to protect the second son. 18.2 said here that moses sent her back between. moses sets up a judge system where many leaders under him judge the laws. moses 19.2-3 go up and go down 34.28-29.
chapter 24 is a problem- how can moses interact with the nation when he is up since 20.21 at the latest unless the past tense means he made the covenant earlier and what occurred earlier   was written later. another problem is that many details between chapter 19-34 are absent from josepus parallel.

i would summarize these sixteen 16 chapters 19-34  by saying "many many many laws" however the absence in the parallel and the fact that although josepus does not conceal the flaws of israel in other stories, he lacks this sin of the golden calf in chapter 32, indicate the rabbis added it later. how could they force writers to write a new story at all, especially staining the jews ancestors- unless they used brutal beatings? and what a coincidence the talmud said rabbis had that authority. who knows what else they added to the original from excluded-written-stories, after jesus and after josepus- in the talmud era when rabis beat people who did marriage ceremonies "like the mishna instruction" but "rab"= aba did not like it.
a comparison with josepus shows that much of what is in exodus between chapter 19 and 32 is not in josepus' parallel! and may not have been in the original prophecy from god- BLASPHEMY!!!
clearly i am not a christian nor a religious jew based on this suggestion- but i quote the new testament for clarifying certain issues. and i did say some things that christians agree with.
so in chapter 19 moses went up and came down in chapter 34 after hearing some laws.
the rest of exodus tells they made a wooden tent with gold utensils [chapters 35-40 repeating chapters 25,26,27,28 with every detail again and 29 will be repeated in leviticus] for service- a box and a lamp and a table an altar for spice-burning and another non-gold altar outside the wooden tent and all surrounded by curtains and all was assembled bringing us to the sacrifices in leviticus.
concluded part one of session 2 it took me twelve minutes to read this so half hour to go.

moses 5-4-3 exodus

moses 54-3 continued

session 2 continued

goal: session 2 must summarize 61 sixty one columns [1/4 of 245] of jew-scroll and 1/4 of 92000 words 23000 words which is many! to understand just how many that is- it is more than the number of seconds in SIX HOURS. the book of exodus has around 19300 words so the goal is even bigger than the entire book of exodus! which we can easily understand is so formidable almost no-one would even try to read the whole thing and of the few who try almost none "study" the entire exodus hence the need for a summary.
we are 5 minutes behind schedule as we proceed in exodus chapter 4
***until now: summarized the birth of moses 2 and that he is the famous prophet of the "burning bush" which DID NOT BURN and with precision jesus calls it "the bush" in mark 12.26 the bush had a flame of fire and did not burn 3.2 then moses returned to egypt and 4.30 did signs. [note maimonidies claims "jews did not believe because of signs" corrupting this section: moses did signs and afterwards they believed. he also claims messiah "does not need to do signs and bar kokba did not do signs" see footnote- maimonidies clearly wrote these ideas in response to jesus] moses asks king for three day trip- why 3? also hosea 6.2 "after two days we will live" on the third day- if he means "many dead" plural then why third day? clearly moses and hosea are referring to jesus.
moses asks for three days as a symbol that the mesiah will revive to life on the third day and similarly hosea spoke of many "we live" in faith: from dead faith to live faith specifically on the third day when jesus rises from dead.
short part resulting from software challenges and  limited time see you all tmoro!

advertisement

if you like my summary of genesis stay tuned for exodus i hope today to add a session and make the order readable
also tell your friends about the summary and let them choose  if they like it
it is called 5-4-3
here is the link
http://tomsawyerssongs.blogspot.co.il/2015/01/moses-5-4-3.html

the double rhyme

i heard a song today with unique talent

they succeeded in a double rhyme

and I will practice a mimic

the double rhyme is: aaaa+b cccc+b

since i am practice i plan a couplet aa+b cc+b hoping it would be simpler until my skill improves

[update third line- this is hard and complex- greater skill! 

i need aa bb+c and dd ee+c] 

title: women like bald men better anyway

by ts

:

life has treated me unfair

I am bald my head is bare

a hair-implant makes me scared

i wish i had more hair+ friend

I'm nervous but I'll risk it

as I munch my last biscuit

I distract myself with rhymes

save money 'til my dimes+ end!

what do you all think of my attempt? at least i tried!