more problems in the gospels

the most important issue in christianity as defined in corinthians 15 is jesus death- yet specifically this incident is reported by two conflicting versions. somehow among the "so-called-holy" books with the wisdomn of god and no contradictions- they made the bad decision to include conflicting versions and insist that the followers musty believe that both conflicting versions are true- something rational people like myself refuse to submit to.

the "apparrent" contradiction is that according to john, the romans killed jesus before the sacrifice of the passover and he was the passover- whereas according to other gospels he was killed after the day of the passover sacrifice- rational people can only be fooled if only one version or the other are read but will recognize the problem of believing both are true-

since paul says jesus was our passover- that is a better match to john and therefore matthew mark and luke which got the wrong date - relative to john- assuming john is a good book as christians believe- we may not include the unreliable bookds of matthew mark and luke- which have the wrong date reegarding the most central issue- as mentiuoned when was jesus the sacrifice

other problems in matthew is the 14 generations whcih are not "truly" 14 so saying 14 is not holy and the list conflicts both the lists in luke and chronicles so more reason to decide not to include the unreliable book of matthew in the group- because the generations conflict b oth chronicles and luke and similarly luke conflict chronicles and matthew which all are different from kings 2 - 14.21

"And all the people of Judah took Azariah, which was sixteen years old, and made him king instead of his father Amaziah."

http://www.kingjamesbibleonline.org/2-Kings-Chapter-14/

who was his father?

according to the new testament "Asa begat Josaphat; and Josaphat begat Joram; and Joram begat Ozias;" no amazia and wrong dad so unreliable book we know hass errors and we can be certain that those who decided to include erred and did not have any "help" from the holy spirit and cannot trust them about which books should be in.

this is not central- only the death of jesus is central but even this shows the error of the people deciding and the unreliability of the book. god would know but this is not from god.

although this is a big enough problem the issue of the date of jesus death is much more severe- when doid the romans kill him was he the passover or the day after the day of passover? rational people like me cannot believe both versions which do not match - only faith can say both stories are true- untroubled that the date does not match- god would know! so these versions are CERTAINL not from god- and the decision to include both versions whcih do not match- is  a bad decision. 

So I will decide- accept and include john's version so that jesus was the sacrifice matching paul- and the edate was the passover of the jews- and do not include the versions of unreliable matyhew mark and luke- which erred both about the geneology and more severe about the focal issue of jesus being a sacrifice-

however john itself has a great problem! called christology

http://www.kingjamesbibleonline.org/John-14-26_14-29/

how can jesus and the father be the same one and yet14.28 "my father is greater than I" i once saw a trinity christian try to explain his faith with math symbols-
 he wrote jesus name and the fathers name and then he added two symbols- the equal sign and the greater than symbol!
there is a symbol greater than or equal but not BOTH equal and greater!

rational people like myself cannot accept that both are true- the same one "cannot" be greater than himself!only those with blind faith and religious salaries will insist two things that do not match are both true. also "my god" and eph 1.17

also john insists numerous times that jesus was eternal - as if divine- chapter one, before abraham and others- yet he has a god in chapter 20!

john 20.17
http://www.kingjamesbibleonline.org/search.php?q=my+god&bsec=N&order=

if jesus is the same god as the father- then not "my god" if they are separeate, then that is still different than john 10 so john is also unreliable- god would know but this book is from errant men-

LUCKILY- paul did not write theos when he said jesus is master- not theos! so we are free to deny the doctrine of triune or trinity or whatever you call it-
jesus was only the messia and not divine and even the book of john which has errors that seem to describe jesus as eternal only mean that the "idea of messia" existed eternal-
not jesus himself- jesus said he was "less" than god not the same so the rest of john is unreliable and not from god- jesus admitted "father is greater he is my god and only god" if those verses are good as christians must believe than do not corrupt them! the other verses that do not match show the book is bad and unreliable- so the book john, is out like the other gospels and only one verse

i go to my god can remain with the letters of paul. maybe acts is good? i can only hope!
also john 14.16 "allos" means  another helper- the holy spirit is separate  but if the triune is one than the book of john is heresyor the doctrine of triune trinity is heresy- you get to choose.