one issue well defended- is the challenge to the new testament that in luke-
"thirty years of age, being (as was supposed ) the son of Joseph, which was the son of Heli,"
compare the text- the word "son" only appears once because luke refers to a DAUGHTER!
"τριάκοντα ὢν υἱός ὡς ἐνομίζετο Ἰωσὴφ τοῦ Ἠλὶ" the word tou means "of"
https://www.blueletterbible.org/Comm/guzik_david/StudyGuide_Luk/Luk_3.cfm?a=976023
explains that luke says "mary was the daughter of eli" this matches with precision luke used the word for son "only once" precision.
in contrast mathew wants jesus to inherit the kingdom from joseph- the husband of his mother.
so it would seem proper to edit these genealogies to make them clearer!
mathew 1.1 jesus inherited the kingdom of israel from the kings of david. 2 jesus was a/n heir to abraham and david etc. +and use the word son- joseph son of jacob etc.--
in contrast to luke to edit jesus was the grandson of eli son of etc. because it is not josef's father but mary's father hence the word tou- of and the word son not repeated- only once "thought to be nominaly the son of josef" because son of mary- "mary of eli" her pa was eli but josefs pa was jacob.
אין תגובות:
הוסף רשומת תגובה