when we were kids, our parents told us there was a god
or not
either way-
we can be certain that the god of the bible does not exist and the bible is a fictional book of imaginary stories to keep people from being bored.
i once thought the bible was a kids book- but the content is very inappropriate for kids- rated r like videos. the only benefit teach young children bible is to abuse their "developing intelligence" and "trust" for the purpose of religion.
we should be more selective which stories to reveal to them- the same as video-games and videos are rated.
anyway there is a joke:
lois lane captured by the evil "bad-guy" and locked with hostages who pray "god help me"-
and she screams "superman help"
we all know what happens when that happens
we all know what happens when people beg god for help.
**my point is- the god of the bible is described as merciful and just meaning justice
and as superman said in superman returns 2006 " i hear people calling for a savior all the time" 1.13.35-1.13:55
and he can help and does- in contrast to the god of the bible- who died and the only god does not know or knows but decides not to help- clearly not the one described in the bible.
so do not believe the lies of religion
besides each religion has flaws even at the core-
a god religion should have godly perfection but the disagreements not at the core are numerous because people argued about what the religion should be and without god could not agree
more important than "flaw" instead of "flawless guidance"
is the flawed CORES of religions.
start from the jewish bible which made it into the catholic version-
the book warns do not add-
the religious jews who do believe god said not to add- yet have no hesitation to accept what was added-
the core of the religion is do what god never prescribed and all issues are equal with no "core"
i do not accept additions and neither should anyone
take christianity- at its CORE "someone died for sins and rose from the dead" 1 cor 15-
but that very story AT THE CORE has contradictions- the book said he was in the grave three days so one messianic jew says the catholic friday version is a lie- because then it is not "three days" from saturday to sunday morning-
he must be crucified on wensday because the bible is true-
this story false-at the very CORE STORY OF RESURRECTION
no problem- simply deny catholics and the bibles- and the verse with the number three or say three is not "literal" numbers are not important.
a second flaw at this core story is which day relative to the passover-
to demonstrate- christianity has a set of holy books-
the faith is "all are holy with no errors" because they are "all from god" yet somehow they need to "interpret" the core issue- was christ the passover or not?
they include the book of john which says several times he was killed the day of the passover and BEFORE the passover- prepare the passover john 19.14
in contrast to mark and luke after he ate the passover with his students-
this is a contradiction at the core story when did he die for the sins-
IN THE CORE STORY in the core of the faith-
the foundation story that he died is based on "at least one lie" if it was the passover day=fourteenth of the month then the versions that he ate the passover at the appointed time are false-
and if not- then john is false-
AT THE FOUNDATION STORY
in addition christians have created an "additional" core "very important to them"-
water baptism is extremely important-
yet this artificial core is problematic because the word "water" is absent when jesus said to baptise and knowing that christians teach two baptisms means that the absent word is important- also considering that they also teach "baptism in the spirit"-
which they do- then they need to play games with the phrase "one baptism" in the book of ephesians clearly these religions are not from god- who would teach precisely what is true and important- his truth-
the essence of religions EVEN AT THEIR CORE shows "flawed stubborn humans" who could not reach agreement-
and we see the fruit of the catholic faith to save the souls by torturing the body into submission-
does that even count? if they were compelled?
and the fruit of the islamic instructions- we can "say the quran never said to be violent" until we are willing to read it- and who cares what the quran did not say- look at the religion itself- the holiness of the prophet-
and the response to shaming the holy prophet- that is not justice!
to "protect his honor" to the point of hurting and killing someone- who did not kill nor injure- for the crime of shaming the holy prophet- that is not justice-
we now that general mohamed was not exactly a peace maker... especially if the quran is true- we can read it.
so how about morality instead? that is what god wants- more than any widespread religion!
god is not a savior. the only savior is superman.
אין תגובות:
הוסף רשומת תגובה