holiday season

this year jewish holidays coincide with muslim holidays

on september 15 the jews celebrated the jewish new year of the hebrew calendar-

I criticize this because it is not the new year that god told the jewish prophets-

what happens at the new year? the number for the year went up by one.

near it is the jewish holiday of yom kippur-

a day when many jews "deny themselves" from eating and drinking by fasting.

it was ten days after the new year which I also criticise for several reasons mainly that denying is not a commant to  fast an the tradition has five options how to deny among other problems.

at that time the muslims celebrated the holiday of sacrifice on 23 september of 2015

"Eid al-Adha in 2015 is on Wednesday, the 23rd of September. Based on sightability in North America, in 2015 Eid al-Adha will start in North America a day later"

 according to muslim faith the focus is that ibrahim called abraham by christians- sacrificed his son- the quran does not say which son. but the point is as above.

however muslims emphasizee on their websites that the version in the christian bible is false-

http://www.whyislam.org/submission/five-pillars-of-islam-2/pilgrimage/festival-of-the-sacrifice/

" the sacrifice that God (Allah) commanded to Prophet Abraham of his beloved son, Ismail."

this is significant and has caused many muslims who know the quran to abandon islam because they know that the quran requires "to read wisdom from the books of moses and jesus" and when the muslim religious leaders say that this is the holiday- they are aware of the problem that they are required to get wisdom from the book of moses- and therefore it was not ismail but isac and they know the leader lied to them and those who value truth and believe in the holy quran are required by it to read the books of moses and jesus and therefore leave the lies of the muslim leaders.

one other possibility is to claim as the muslim leaders tell those who ask that the "truth" is ismail while the books of moses are corrupt- assuming this is true the holy quran "would not" direct to read the "corrupt" book of moses and clearly the books of moses are "not corrupt" specifically according to the quran leading many muslims to publish this logic and convert to christianity

!!

equinox

1first the day which has a length of 12 hours exactly for equal day and night is identified as september 27 this year.

2second the month based on the moon [called lunar] ended september 13 at 10 am, [after almost 30 days= 29 days and 15 hours] therefore the new month should begin on september 13 and be called the first of the lunar month- but instead the jewish lunar calendar made the new month 14 and "maybe" 15 of september when there can be no dount about 15 and even 14 is the wrong date because the previous month ended august 14 at 6 pm [at my coast]and if we assume that on that same "evening" begins the new month then 15 is first and 31 is 17 of lunar and september 1 would be called 18 and 12 of september would end the month with 29 days- like the rule "most months elul is not extra" in rashi and then that night would begin the first of the month-lunar called 13 september far from 15- there can be no doubt about 15 and even 14 is a day off so the calendar is not lunar- but delayed and the true first of the month for the new year should have been september 13 and therefore the fourteenth was the "wrong day" and besides we should compare to the chinese

http://www.timeanddate.com/calendar/about-chinese.html

august 14 began the chinese 7 month while the jewish calendar was again wrong with a two day error! continuing two more days to the "lunar" month- shameful!

14 and 15 were called the old lunar month way too long! while the chinese lunar was not only earlier but matching the moon because the cycle ended on the 14 and that same evening the like sabath begins in evening and certainly not a long month of 29 and 30 for the lunar which resulted in delaying the celebration of new year to the wrong date relative to the moon-

the seventh month had 30 days ending on the day we call saturday september 12 and the new month hence should begin september 13 as the first of the month and new year and if we start at evening like sabath then if so end sept 12 means that at the end of 12 begins the new year and the jew s"missed" the lunar date! and celebrated and did all the long ceremonies on the wromg day-

so better to ignore the "special" dates because they cannot get it "correctly" ="cant get it right".

=

3is gregorian any better? only in some ways however 21 of september is called equinox but actualy the days length is still longer than the night- 12 and aquarter hours- today september 20 12.15.40 from the time we call 6.40 until 18.57

and 21 6.42-18.55 not the "technical" equinox of new york!

even four days later september 25 the day is "too long" and september 26 is the "technical equinox and should be marked as a "special" unique day both in new york city new york not september 21 which is merely an "average" and not even the 23 as a reliable website claimed for that location new york

http://www.timeanddate.com/calendar/seasons.html?n=179

instead september twenty six the day is from 6.47-18.47 at 40-41 degrees north and whether 32-33 degrees north

september 25 6.31-18.34 too long so 27 is the equinox this year but usualy 26 indicating the need for a leap year day which will be provded! february 29, of 2016

=

4

following my surprise upon seeing your jordan map- that you took sides on the jordan map- i felt the need to open your syria map and was appalled that you ignored the 1973 cease-fire agreement between israel and syria- see below, and showed syria  as if syria includes the coast of the sea of galilee at 33 degrees north, please do not ignore the local cease-fire agreement! of 31 may 1974 see below- and mark the cease-fire line as agreed upon by the two sides- syria and israel.

"A disengagement agreement with Syria was signed in Geneva on 31 May 1974. It included exchange of prisoners of war, limitation on armed forces, Israeli withdrawal from territory that was captured in the 1973 war" == 

thank you

sources:

https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v26/d88

https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v26/ch2

and even israel admitted they gave some

http://www.mfa.gov.il/mfa/aboutisrael/maps/pages/yom%20kippur%20war%20cease-fire%20lines-%20october%2024-%201973.aspx

map "secret" at http://www.nevo.co.il/law_html/law09/amana-0851.pdf

https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v26/d88

eq v new v 29v 

jesus with pilate

what, in the book of john, is supported by a second witness?

**then, at dawn, they led jesus to pilat and accused. pilat asked jesus "Are you the king of the Jews?"

[...] [the replies do not match because what appears in john is not supported by luke]

pilat said, "I find no basis for a charge against this man." +what pilat said, according to john, is supported in luke, but what happened between? 

why did pilat ignore the accusations? the way the books are, demonstrates flawed originals- my solution follows the analysis.

analysis

1 did high priest question jesus? maybe! john 18.19+24 said yes and repeat "from high priest" 18.28 after rooster j18.27 and luke did not contradict.

(Luke 23:1 NIV) Then -[=minus]the Xwhole assembly Xrose and 

*led him to Pilate+

(John 18:28 NIV) Then (the Jews)

*led Jesus (from Caiaphas) *to (the palace of the Roman governor. By now it was early morning, and to avoid ceremonial uncleanness the Jews did not enter the palace; they wanted to be able to eat the Passover.John 18:29 NIV So) *Pilate. 

note: if luke denied the bit about the high priest, then it is consistent that he does not say "from".

john adds it is morning- matching the rooster crow in both versions. 

they wanted to eat the passover- is consistent in john, but according to luke they ate it before the rooster crowed! no need to "be able to eat the passover" 

!!

this is a critical problem about the core story CORE story of death- on the day of the passover is false if he ate the passover at its day as luke 22.7

to value the truth- is to deny both versions.

according to luke, they accuse, jesus admits he is king and pilate decides not guilty?

(Luke 23:2 NIV) they began to *accuse him, saying, "We have found this man subverting our nation. He opposes payment of taxes to Caesar and claims to be Christ, a king."(Luke 23:3 NIV) So Pilate asked Jesus, "Are you the king of the Jews?" "Yes, it is as you say," Jesus replied.(Luke 23:4 NIV) Then Pilate announced to the chief priests and the crowd, "I find no basis for a charge against this man."

note until "no basis" only sixty words.

why did pilate free him- if he said he is king? agreeing to the accusations. it is much shorter than john until pilates decision-

the key difference is that in john he says to be a king of a different world- not competing with the ceasar. this is what requires editing, however the two versions support each other very little.

compare

-Xcame out to them and Xasked, "What charges are you bringing against this man?" (John 18:30 NIV) "If he were not a criminal," they Xreplied, "we would not have handed him over to you."  (John 18:31 NIV) Pilate Xsaid, "Take him yourselves and judge him by your own law." "But we have no right to execute anyone," the Jews objected. (John 18:32 NIV) This happened so that the words Jesus had spoken indicating the kind of death he was going to die would be fulfilled. John 18:33 NIV) Pilate then went back inside the palace, summoned Jesus and 

*asked him, "Are you the king of the Jews?"  

(John 18:34 NIV) "Is that your own idea," Jesus Xasked, "or did others talk to you about me?"  (John 18:35 NIV) "Am I a Jew?" Pilate Xreplied. "It was your people and your chief priests who handed you over to me. What is it you have done?"  (John 18:36 NIV) Jesus said, "My kingdom is not of this world. If it were, my servants would fight to prevent my arrest by the Jews. But now my kingdom is from another place."  (John 18:37 NIV) "You are a king, then!" said Pilate. Jesus answered, "You are right in saying I am a king. In fact, for this reason I was born, and for this I came into the world, to testify to the truth. Everyone on the side of truth listens to me."  (John 18:38 NIV) "What is truth?" Pilate asked. With this he went out again to the Jews and said, "I find no basis for a charge against him.

until "no basis" much more than 60. 218 words just in this section alone j18.34-38 and nothing in j is supported by l! it is supported by the prejudice called faith- but none of these details are supported by luke.

faith would be to say all details are true- they accused and pilate asked and they said he criminal and he questioned jesus, however-

a book that said jesus said "give to ceasar" should not have them saying "not pay taxes" and it is appropriate for john to leave that out. john adds that they want to kill him and cant.

from these 278 words, which details are supported?

l they accuse, but skips pilat ask- and the accusations do not match- j criminal who deserves death yet l king. not even one detail in j is supported by l with different details.

why in j does pilat ask about king? he was not accused of king- the book is flawed. compare: (Luke 23:2 NIV) And they began to *accuse him, Xsaying, "We have found this man Xsubverting our nation. He Xopposes payment of taxes to Caesar and claims to be Christ, a 

*king."(Luke 23:3 NIV) So Pilate asked Jesus, "Are you the king of the Jews?" 

until pilate asked r u king not even one detail matches. 

what is supported?

**then, at dawn, they led jesus to pilat and accused. pilat asked jesus "Are you the king of the Jews?" 

only the question matches but is not appropriate to the accusations of that book and worse the answers of jesus do not match- and he did "open his mouth" but what did he answer?

luke yes, but lacks ask yet in john jesus asks.

perhaps jesus did not answer anything and that is why john and luke each guessed what happened-

so my solution is "jesus did not open his mouth"

according to john jesus answers it is NOT "as you say" but a different king! not the same as pilat means- Xas and Xyou

to repair the two versions requires some editing!

how will pilate hear if jesus does not open his mouth?

pilate summons judas to ask what did he teach- judas sways pilate with the truth.

without these edits the books are flawed and christians base faith on flawed books.

**conclusion: [Jesus did not open his mouth. so Pilate asked the priests to bring his students, to ask what jesus taught, and they knew judas and called him. judas said that jesus taught "My kingdom is not of this world" so] pilat said, "I find no basis for a charge against this man."

comparison: "Yes, it is Xas you say," Jesus replied.(Luke 23:4 NIV) Then Pilate Xannounced to the chief priests and the crowd, "I find no basis for a charge against this man." sources: http://mppres.org/bible/john/

http://mppres.org/bible/Luke/Luke23.htm

supporting witnesses

of the numerous stories, told in the gospels of john and luke- together over 6000 words-

6350 words, from the reception hosanna until pilate, (as explained in the previous post, link provided below, please see later]

very little of the "story" is supported by both witnesses!

if i begin with an empty page- what should i believe? the religion would demand i believe all of both stories, but I question- from the books themselves- what should i believe? read the two stories and see that only a bit is supported by both witnesses.

I begin the story "five days before" the crucifixion- when jesus entered-

on a colt? or on a donkey? 

which he got before they said hosanna? or after??

we should stop expecting precision from books not provided by god.

///

***chapter one Reception

Jesus came toward Jerusalem, and people shouted "blessed is he who comes in the name of the lord, the messiah/christ". Later they ate and jesus said one who is here will assist my arrest and they asked each other about whom did he speak. Peter said "I will die with you" but jesus replied " I say to you, before the rooster crows  you will deny me three times. then jesus went outside.

chapter 2 Arrest

Judas came with a group of soldiers and one person hit  the slave of the high priest on the right ear and jesus said "enough". they grabbed jesus [in the dark].

chapter 3 peter denies

in a house owned by the high priest, a maidservant said about simon "he is one of jesus'-" but simon denied. they lit a fire [now or before the first denial?]and said to simon "you are his disciple" and he denied again. later, another said "he was with jesus" and petyer denied for the third time and then the rooster crowed.

chapter 4 pilate

in the morning etc.

we see that from john 12= the chapter of the reception, until pilate [chapters 12>18.29], and when compared with the longer chapters of luke 19.1-23.1 and totalling 6350 hebrew words [which are more efficient than the much greater number of english words, in the same section] only

***170 "words of story" are supported by both witnesses and in efficient hebrew words only 99-

only 99 hebrew words "of story" are supported by both witnesses.

when dealing with the numerous differences between the gospels and the stories- which are "not supported by both" and often conflict- we msut emphasize that these chapters are not a core faith of christianity- and still it shows that the books were written by people who made numerous errors.

so relying on the book themselves- one would see a short story supported by both of about 170 words- and not the numerous chapters of john and luke etc.

for background:

http://tomsawyerssongs.blogspot.co.il/2015/09/comparing-four-gospels.html

the harm of marriage wed

http://tomsawyerssongs.blogspot.co.il/2015/09/wed-harm.html
new title same content

wed-harm

awesome

bandits 2001, @ 1.40-1.45 the two of you make the perfect man- 

wow! the idea of one man to one woman has several dangers and what if two men together are the perfect match for one woman- but there is another angle

counterproductive

in the same way that a woman who complains that her husband does not spend time with her that complaining is the "cause" that it is not FUN to be around and causes the effect of less together time because he does not want to hear compolains and counterproductive and intensifies the separation-

instead if a woman wants her husband around more SHE SHOULD MAKE IT FUN TIME in fun talk etc.

complain is counterproductive and results in less together time

similarly when two people are NOT WED-if they enjoy together time they each INVEST EFFORT

so the other will want to be near-

until they decide to wedf

 that HARMS !!

they rely on the wedding bond-
to keep them together-
instead of politeness.

be aware of the harm of wed!

comparing the four gospels

part of the christian faith is "belief" in the book, which contains four gospels- as a holy book not to deny, and to accept even before reading. as the student is exposed to the contents he claims "this is also true"

however one may approach the four gospels differently, and we can compare them.

three of them are synoptic and have already been compared by scholars.

I own a book which aligns the sections of the three synoptic gospels with each other.

glaring inconsistencies are not at the core of the faith- but one is the lineage of jesus in which both the lineage in matthew, with the number 42, and the different lineage in luke are true- and 

NUMBERS ARE NOT IMPORTANT

or as one christian told me "this does not bother me"- well it should if honesty and truth is/were important.
Who was the grandfather of jesus?

according to matthew: jacob but according to [matthew oops] luke 3- someone else.

i will not put effort for what i already have a book about, hence remains to compare john to the three- and of the three the only one that claims to be "according to the order" is luke and this is significant because according to luke AFTER jesus entered and was greeted "blessed is he who comes", he went to the temple and chased out the sale- and this is the "order", in contrast to john which was not "according to order" and the same story appears in chapter 2, long before the entry when he was greeted by hosanna blessed is he who comes.

one may claim it happened twice but i think it is the same story which occurred- once and after the reception because luke wrote in order- as he claimed in luke 1 while john never claimed to write in order and wrote a later story, earlier.

on this background i compared the story from the reception of "blessed is he who comes" until jesus arrest and brought to pilate-
and discovered that the versions in luke and john are very different

the christian faith is: all the details of each story are true-
because first begin with faith and second find out what the true book says however what about reversing the other first read the book and then decide if it is true or not- that would be blasphemy.
and worse would be pointing out the contradiction mentioned in the previous post- about not yet eating the passover, after the day of the passover. cough.
but that should not bother anyone-

unless truth and honesty were important-

at least at the "core of the faith" story of resurrection.

anywho-

the hebrew versions, which have fewer words than english, total over 6000 words from the reception of blessed is who who comes, until the arrest and brought to pilate, in luke [19.1-23.1] chosen because it is in order as above+ plus the parallel story in john from the chapter with the reception hosanna blessed is he who comes- until the arrest for pilate- and reveal very different stories and even minor inconsistencies exist-
for example when exactly did peter deny 3 times? compare and see-

can two differing versions "both truly" be what actually occurred? if faith demands ignoring your own opinion, honesty is not important.

whatever-

we should not "nit pick" with questions like "when exactly".

if we look at luke and john as witnesses writing, we cannot trust them alone- unless they support each other-

only if we start with faith, that "this whole book is true", then believe each of the differing versions- but what about the other order?

we have a book with four versions. now, which points support each other?

from the stories which accumulate a total of over 6000 words - six thousand in john and luke, 6350, of them less than 99 "words of story" support each other- less than one sixtieth! 

1/60 !! 

not only searching for identical words- which are even fewer- but comparing the "idea" and the "story" less than one hundred words "of story" support each other- as two witnesses.

for me that means that 59/60 the rest- is not supported.

what remains, will appear in the next post but i would not accept one witness alone- besides those points which both luke and john support each other-
and in the order of luke- but only what is in john and also in luke. the result will appear next time and it is very short.

**the "bottom line"

from chapter 12-18 of john and even longer chapters in luke- less than one hundred words are supported by both witnesses.

a shocking book

messianic jews in israel published a shocking book-

these jews, who believe in the book called new testament and emphasize water baptism just like almost all "serious" christians- have-

assembled the sections of the four "gospels" into one story, called the "life of christ"-

if you are a christian, reading now, this probably makes you feel happy and wonder why i chose the "wrong" title for this article?

because blending together the gospel of john with luke [or synoptic] makes a certain problem more noticeable.

ready for some "blasphemy"?

according to luke- on the day of the passover luke 22.7

"7 Then came the day of unleavened bread, when the passover must be killed."

http://www.kingjamesbibleonline.org/Luke-Chapter-22/

he ate it- "15 And he said unto them, With desire I have desired to eat this passover with you before I suffer"

and this is "duely recorded" in the chapter called "the week of the Crucifixion" the story continues and about ten pages LATER after reading about arresting jesus in the "dark" and peter denied three times until the rooster crowed and then "morning came"- apparently the morning after the passover sacrifice- this book quotes from john- that they had not yet eaten the passover-

glaringly long after eating the passover- somehow the following morning they had not eaten-

"27 Peter then denied again: and immediately the cock crew [crowed].  28 Then led they Jesus from Caiaphas unto the hall of judgment: and it was early [dawn niv etc.] and they themselves went not into the judgment hall, lest they should be defiled; but that they might eat the passover."

huh? you said they ate already?

if luke 22.7 is true, then this is false- they already ate and no concern about "so they can eat" and if the day of the passover was when christ was killed, like corinthians 5 and john, then luke and the synoptics are false-

***my point is blending them into one tale-

helps to show the problem

i suggest that two groups of christians compromised on having both versions in the one uniting "new testament book" and later it became blasphemy to deny either one of the versions and must believe both.

if i wanted to "compromise" between full denial and ignoring my opinion=full faith, then-

i would prefer the pair of corinthians with john as more reliable- and have faith that christ was the passover- while rejecting the three gospels of mathew mark and luke-

as erroneous and therefore not holy- 

but then i would be a blasphemer- and gain nothing from saying "3 false and 2 true" john and corinthians are true...

so why bother?

if you value truth-

do not accept the twists of falsehoods- choose a version and deny the other.

evidence to reject the god of the bible

when we were kids, our parents told us there was a god

or not

either way-

we can be certain that the god of the bible does not exist and the bible is a fictional book of imaginary stories to keep people from being bored.

i once thought the bible was a kids book- but the content is very inappropriate for kids- rated r like videos. the only benefit teach young children bible is to abuse their "developing intelligence" and "trust" for the purpose of religion.

we should be more selective which stories to reveal to them- the same as video-games and videos are rated.

anyway there is a joke:

lois lane captured by the evil "bad-guy" and locked with hostages who pray "god help me"-

and she screams "superman help" 

we all know what happens when that happens

we all know what happens when people beg god for help.

**my point is- the god of the bible is described as merciful and just meaning justice

and as superman said in superman returns 2006 " i hear people calling for a savior all the time"  1.13.35-1.13:55

and he can help and does- in contrast to the god of the bible- who died and the only god does not know or knows but decides not to help- clearly not the one described in the bible.

so do not believe the lies of religion

besides each religion has flaws even at the core-

a god religion should have godly perfection but the disagreements not at the core are numerous because people argued about what the religion should be and without god could not agree

more important than "flaw" instead of "flawless guidance"

is the flawed CORES of religions.

start from the jewish bible which made it into the catholic version-

the book warns do not add-

the religious jews who do believe god said not to add- yet have no hesitation to accept what was added- 

the core of the religion is do what god never prescribed and all issues are equal with no "core"

i do not accept additions and neither should anyone

take christianity- at its CORE "someone died for sins and rose from the dead" 1 cor 15-

but that very story AT THE CORE has contradictions- the book said he was in the grave three days so one messianic jew says the catholic friday version is a lie- because then it is not "three days" from saturday to sunday morning-

he must be crucified on wensday because the bible is true-

this story false-at the very CORE STORY OF RESURRECTION

no problem- simply deny catholics and the bibles- and the verse with the number three or say three is not "literal" numbers are not important.

a second flaw at this core story is which day relative to the passover- 

to demonstrate- christianity has a set of holy books-

the faith is "all are holy with no errors" because they are "all from god" yet somehow they need to "interpret" the core issue- was christ the passover or not?

they include the book of john which says several times he was killed the day of the passover and BEFORE the passover- prepare the passover john 19.14

in contrast to mark and luke after he ate the passover with his students-

this is a contradiction at the core story when did he die for the sins-

IN THE CORE STORY in the core of the faith- 

the foundation story that he died is based on "at least one lie" if it was the passover day=fourteenth of the month then the versions that he ate the passover at the appointed time are false-

and if not- then john is false-

AT THE FOUNDATION STORY

in addition christians have created an "additional" core "very important to them"-

water baptism is extremely important-

yet this artificial core is problematic because the word "water" is absent when jesus said to baptise and knowing that christians teach two baptisms means that the absent word is important- also considering that they also teach "baptism in the spirit"-

which they do- then they need to play games with the phrase "one baptism" in the book of ephesians clearly these religions are not from god- who would teach precisely what is true and important- his truth-

the essence of religions EVEN AT THEIR CORE shows "flawed stubborn humans" who could not reach agreement-

and we see the fruit of the catholic faith to save the souls by torturing the body into submission-

does that even count? if they were compelled?

and the fruit of the islamic instructions- we can "say the quran never said to be violent" until we are willing to read it- and who cares what the quran did not say- look at the religion itself- the holiness of the prophet-

and the response to shaming the holy prophet- that is not justice!  

to "protect his honor" to the point of hurting and killing someone- who did not kill nor injure- for the crime of shaming the holy prophet- that is not justice-

we now that general mohamed was not exactly a peace maker... especially if the quran is true- we can read it.

so how about morality instead? that is what god wants- more than any widespread religion!

god is not a savior. the only savior is superman.

Senate foreign relations

U.S. Senator Bob Menendez, senior member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, stated "the U.S. was forfeiting whatever leverage it had left" regarding Iran,

despite being on obama's "democratic" team, this expert in foreign relations still recognized the problem that this Iran-treaty conceded way too much

this is significant because although we can expect the republicans [such as corker] to oppose obama we see democrats recognizing the need for continued sanctions on iran

**it is appropriate to legislate that the US must continue sanctions on Iran until they accept the conditions which austria accepted in the austria state treaty of 1955

the "war" claim can be used by both sides "remove sanctions to avoid war" or "keep sanctions to avoid war" but that is just a trick, because-

there is war in the middle east already and no new war will generated either way.

the result of continued sanctions may be that iran finally compromises-

or continues to be pressured by sanctions until new leaders replace the current iranian leaders.

for more details

http://edition.cnn.com/2015/08/18/politics/bob-menendez-corker-iran-nuclear-deal/index.html