"non-biblical" christmas

it is common for protestants to REJECT ideas from catholic and other sources because they are "un-biblical" for example no santa on christmas etc. yet if so, we must consider the fact that jesus never taught his disciples, not even once in ALL four gospels to celebrate nor even mark the date of his "dwelling with" humans, nor his birth, nor his coming to the earth nor his birthday.

even if we go one step away from jesus' teachings to the practices in the book of acts the "original" christians never taught this "important" holiday of christmas in any form.

it is time for protestants to teach that "christmas" in any form is unbiblical without basis in the bible. and to stop succumbing to social norms.

teach the churchgoers we will not celebrate jesus having been born in any way not just the ddetails of santa or the tree but every detail not in the bible in any form. instead the teaching before christmas should be that jesus DIDD NOT teach to celebrate christmas in any form and no mass on december 25.

abraham was an alien- in which sense!

genesis 23.2-4

abraham said he is an alien.

traditional religions [jewish and christian] assume and teach that all genesis stories from creation are on this planet named Earth. admittedly the translations did not capitalize the letter 'e' of earth [genisis 1.1] and it might not refer to planet earth.

then religions insist people lived hundreds of years because the bible is true.

but what if abraham traveled from PLANET ur?

we have several puzzle pieces to assemble.

joshua 24.1-3 said "god took abraham" what if that does not mean walking!

this "god" is called plural in genesis 20.13
http://www.mechon-mamre.org/p/pt/pt0120.htm

this is not a spirit-god but gods who sent abraham.

if we accept this, then some problems vanish.

admittedly the bible might be false.

however if we say "took" means a super-being "took abraham" then it could be from PLANET ur.

we know that the orbit of  planet mercury takes less Earth-days than venus and venus's is less Earth-days than Earth's.

if genesis 11.14-15 is not "false" inaccurate then 433 years might not be Earth-years.

if it would be mercury-years it would be 433*88 Earth-days are 104 earth-years of orbits.

if someone came from a planet of EDEN frm whence where adam was rejected where the orbit was faster than mercury then upon arriving at the new planet they would say many years and only live 365*80 earth-days. this could be the commentary of PSALMS to genesis the biblical years were all 70-80 years.

planet EDEN might have had a fast orbit and less length, 30 earth-days [faster than mercury] and then it would not be false to say that 80 earth-years is counted as 900 orbits of Eden, the source of adam and his descendants.

noah was in a boat and could not see what happened for forty days. he thought he stayed on the same planet for a flood. but the lifespan reveals a different orbit speed. I will call the second place: planet noah but the bible might refer to it as PLANET ur. those who lived 80 earth years and called it 900 were counting eden-orbits.

upon arriving on planet mercury, then with water, unlike now, they did not live 900 orbits but 80*365 earth days which on mercury is about a quarter of years- 400 is like 100. perhaps then mercury-orbit was not 88 earth days but 80 earth days. 433*80=95 years.

a magical creature that wasnot spirit but magical physical "took" abraham- if joshua is not false as religions claim and with magic took from planet UR to the land of canaan on earth. 

his life was much less than those on planet ur because human life on this planet is 70-80 years as in psalms.

we may summarise three planets. eden and the expulsion to planet 2 perhaps named ur.

then abraham ws "taken" by a "god" powerful magician from planet ur to the 3 planet Earth where the story continues.

although on earth science has revealed the order of paleozoic first fish [who ate fish] then scorpions who ate each other and finally plants, genesis was not describing this planet EARTH, but a planet with a fast orbit and there the order was the reverse: plants and later fish called EDEN and those were the years counted on planet ur after rejection from eden.

or the bible lied.

close EPA - ?

in new york now the temperature is literraly freezing.

if i would put some water in a plastic cup and put it outdorrs the water would change to ice.

today december 15, the temperature is significantly COLDER than the average of the last thirty years. the average in new york would be a cold 43 degrees, yet the temperature is ACTUALLY below freezing below 32 farenheit by four degrees farenheit.

so people who claim the climate is changing because of methane and "greenhouse" are not only revealed a liars but as "alarmists" fanatics-falsely because the fact is the increased heat of industry and so called greenhouse gasses are not increasing the heat.

but they will say that is only today!

one day is still evidebce because if TRULY we had an impact on the climate the heat would constantly increase.

assiming warming causing flooding like the alarmists show us on tv, then the cooling we see today can calm us no flooding.

what about a weekly trend?

last week called december 4, 2016

the historical average was 46 degrees f. yet the actual temperature for that week was consistantly COOLER  than painfully-cold 43 degrees f.

the global warming alarmists will point at the one date fifth, when the temperature was slightly warmer yet still painfully cold: 49f instead of 46f and still painfully cold even with a coat, yet more days were colder two which is more than one and not only colder than the three degree difference between 46-49 but significantly colder -two days five and ten degrees colder whereas most of the week was the same as average so the trend is that the gasses are not increasing the heat- most days are the same and the exceptions are significantly colder.

 so hearing about more floods than before the internet does not mean there are actually more floods but that information can be spread faster because in fact the trens is the same or on more days SIGNIFICANTLY COLDER

after studying the evidence it is time to end the lies of the alarmists in the so-called environmental protection agency and hope that the SANE voice of the "skeptics" will guide president trump and remove "authority" from emotional-alarmists who mislead people when the facts can easily be compared- and cut the budget-spending.

the epa people can still have "freedom to lie" but not as an agency and with no authority to act.

zoo second attempt

when I was a child my mother made a mean joke when we went to the zoo. "how would you like to be behind bars like that animal."
sound mean until we think of a baby's crib - !
actually PRISON is very different from a zoo because. whereas humans kill- can kill and do kill- each other in prisons and out of prisons the animals are protected in a zoo like a baby in a crib.
when we hear that the number of a certain type of panda the giant panda is less than 2000, we must consider that only a few years ago there were LESS - !!
increasing from 1860 in 2014 to closer to 2000 now- and that is only one of the types of panda.
in fact the dumb animals, like babies, would- without bars- go out and get killed by hunters so the zoo is like a baby's crib bars. preventing the child from going out into danger of the street.
granting food and needs and protection, true protection unlike prisons.
so I am as pro-zoo as pro-crib.
crib has a bar is that evil? it keeps the ignorant baby from going into the street where cars go. and the same for dumb animals.

I support zoo

when I was a child my mother made a mean joke when we went to the zoo. "how would you like to be behind bars like that animal."

sound mean until we think of a baby's crib - !

actually PRISON is very different from a zoo because. whereas humans kill- can kill and do kill- each other in prisons and out of prisons the animals are protected in a zoo like a baby in a crib.

when we hear that the number of a certain type of panda the giant panda is less than 2000, we must consider that only a few years ago there were LESS - !!

increasing from 1860 in 2014 to closer to 2000 now- and that is only one of the types of panda.

in fact the dumb animals, like babies, would- without bars- go out and get killed by hunters so the zoo is like a baby's crib bars. preventing the child from going out into danger of the street.

granting food and needs and protection, true protection unlike prisons.

so I am as pro-zoo as pro-crib.

crib has a bar is that evil? it keeps the ignorant baby from going into the street where cars go. and the same for dumb animals.

truth about famous figures

I feel my responsibility to struggle for truth. i have heard accusations against several public figures and when studying the details they are truly innocent and even politically correct.

MEL GIBSON

has been accused of being a bad racist jew-hater- falsely.

the fact is that he never published jew-hating papers, in the way henry ford did, and only when drunk blurted out "the jews caused all the wars"- something said when drunk. usually politically correct. even that statement was only blame, not hate nor anger of personal nature neither self nor any specific jew. only blame and only when drunk and out of control. when not drunk he of course apologised for losing control in his drunkenness. I say:  "Jews should be more forgiving" because he apologised and was politically-correct.

the fact that he made a film which told the story about jesus being killed by the romans while jews shouted "crucify him"- we cannot expect him to CHANGE the story. 

i know plenty of jews that, given the chance, would shout the same thing and have spoken violently about those who disagree with them and those jews are the ones not politically correct. all gibson did was tell the story as recorded.

also, rachel shucker wrote that gibson was even "pro-jewish".[tablet]

HENRY FORD

ford was truly a jew-hater using his newspaper, independent, for hate towards jews. yet even he apologized and closed the paper in 1927.

source: history.com

what FORD truly wrote: “to my great regret,” he wrote, “I have learned that Jews…resent this publication as promoting anti-Semitism” end quote, this SEEMS TO ME  an apology, and as the article concludes "at the end of the year he closed down the Independent for good." although this story is presented as "insincere"

http://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/henry-ford-publishes-the-last-issue-of-the-dearborn-independent

HOWEVER, I say he apologized, therefore JEWS should be more forgiving to those who apologize.

last but not least: who does not enjoy the products of walt disney company?

WALT DISNEY

not only did he not boycott israeli companies but he even invested in an israeli company called AHAVA products- that is support for jews and Israel not hatred nor boycotting.

EVEN the israeli newspaper jerusalem post published that the acusations against walt disney are false and he was not a racist.
source: http://www.jpost.com/Israel-News/Culture/No-truth-in-claim-that-Walt-Disney-was-an-anti-Semite-410965

those jews who accuse these and other innocents, are the ones who are evil spreading lies.

finaly, although jews are angry at sincere-nazis, and this seems appropriate, they still need to be more forgiving to those who apologise.

weather compare

I saw on the news that utah already has snow this year.

ohio has lterally freezing temperatures called 32 fahrenheit (or less) also called zero centigrade.

also new york is close to zero c.

given a choice of "high schools" would you choose ohio? with snow a couple times this week and freezing temperatures?

or new york also freezing and also snow or florida with warm rain. maybe california with medium and less rain?

we need "educated" choices where to live.

and about global warming the ice "glaciers" calve- that does not mean melt, and they did not say melt! they said calve meaning the ice increased enough to push solid ice off the ground into the sea- MORE ice indicating cold.

now, winter the global-warming-trickers talk about ice melting in the southern hemisphere- because it is summer there... but the cold is as cold as ever in the US winter.

snow even before christmas.

special day In New York!

this week, has a special day to notice.
in the cycle of the sun: the nights get longer until the longest night in December.

however this week in new york city the "switch" from earliest sunset- meaning when the horizon rises  at eve to hide the sun at the earliest time, to later sunsets- meaning more than a full day between sunsets, this switch is this week on december 15 as seen from new york.

check sunset times for your city because each city sees the sunset from a diffrerent angle.

marriage, bitter or better? part 2

who would think that one letter could make such a difference.

for a man, lifetime out of marriage is better with an "e" because there is no limit to possibilities for mating, male or female.

marriage is bad and bitter with an "i" because it limits the spouses, and even defines outer sex as bad cheating- and this limitation allows for manipulations. 

who loses? if a man "punishes" his wife with no sex, then who loses? the man has always been the one desperate enough to pay for sex.

when have we ever seen women OFFERING money to a man to sleep with them? the women GET the money-

and marriage is the SAME arrangement- if the man GIVES her gold jewelry, the engagement ring and another ring and more gold jewelry later- and the women say harlots are victims-? that is the SAME as marriage and also ridiculous because they get the money. [the only issue is pimping not the harlotry itself a distinction which society blurs]

saying harlotry of sex for money is bad- then marriage is the same evil arrangement- gold jewelry and compliments for sex- a condition which if not provided, then do not expect a "wife" but a college-room mate only.

***woe to the man who "comments" about his wife's spending- then she says "I am not in the mood" either in truth because women are almost never in the mood for s,ex or because she is in the mood but is annoyed about the criticism.

considering women are rarely in the mood for sex and less in the mood during pregnancy it seems very appropriate to have four wives as the book of genesis described- 

when one is not in the mood she can wait a few weeks while i am with the others- yet society does not allow polygamy- calling it "immoral" despite it being in the holy book! and being very logical based on marriage experiences... in fact, society makes the wife-harlotry TOO EXPENSIVE for more than one wife. gold jewelry... and a million dresses...

so before any religious marriage consider that out of marriage is better [letter e] and trust me:

avoid religious marriages... any limitation resulting from marriage is the bitter [with letter i] status.

*as the divorcee explained to his young son and daughter who asked why are you leaving?

"it is not your fault, kids, would you be happy if you could only play with one of your toys", well said!

imagine playing the only one same video-action-game every day for a week with no variety.

the marriage creates limitations and manipulation, so who loses? the one who has always been desperate enough to pay for sex- the men.

too bad that the only medium to discuss this bitter truth is on comedy television because this is VERY SERIOUS.

we need to spread this difficult and very bitter [with i] truth.

it should be spoken about in churches too.

clergy need to tell people to get pre-nups [pre-marital agreements that discourage marriage for money and divorce] and... WAIT JUST A freaking minute! 

***what comes to mind with the terminology "church clergy"- what the heck! 

they can tell OTHERS "until death you are bound"

***no wonder clergy do not marry!

marriage?

what exactly is marriage?

marriage is a religious thing- that is why marriages are performed in THE CHURCH=it is religious. for same-genders to agree to commit to each other- is certainly different than the religious because religious will not "couple" same-gender. it is simply a commitment to bind them together without religion.

marriage is the commitment of the man and wife not have se,x with any other. that means that if one decides to deny the spouse se,x they are stuck because they committed to the marriage concept- who will suffer by this?

if we consider that women never PAID money to men, out of desperation for s,ex, while men did pay the "harlot" - that shows who is more desperate... hence the limitation of marriage puts the man at risk- if he does not honor his wife "enough" or "criticizes her spending" or other annoying, then she will say "I am not in the mood for sex and you will not rape me" and who suffers? she does not need to pay any man to do it. and the man can only get it when not married because of the religious commitment called marriage.

some people say that the harlot is the victim but consider the mans deperation even to pay money for se,x while the woman GETS the money, and in marriage has the same arrangement sex for GETS gold jewelery the only way not to feel like a harlot is not to have sex so the man becomes desperate yet again.

the men which "have always been" desperate enough to pay for sex will have no sex at all because the marriage "limits them" to manipulative women- leaving zero. so take my advice- 

**avoid marriage and avoid religious marriage.

if single women can have insemination then single men should be allowed to use out of marriage surrogate proxy for their child if they desire. 

if not the man loses again and loses more than the women who are almost NEVER in the mood anyway or are and lie that they have a headache...

sounds like bitter grapes? yet outside of marriage is not bitter! the options are there: male and female.

recount

jill stein is doing a recount of the votes as if they counted wrong the first time. even hilary accepted the results- what about hilary followers?

remember how hilary followers criticized trump for saying he would not honor the results- they said that is bad and now look at what those same hilary supporters are rioting- the same bad plus disturbing the peace.

Mark and Luke- unitarian

the gospels of mark and luke show that jesus taught he was not divine.

mark 10.17-18 "17 As Jesus started on his way, a man ran up to him and fell on his knees before him. “Good teacher,” he asked, “what must I do to inherit eternal life?” 18 “Why do you call me good?” Jesus answered. “No one is good,except God alone."-- jesus is separating himself from the divine.

instead of saying yes i am good because I am the same one, JESUS SEPARATES HIMSELF according to these gospels, and even denies his divinity. In contrast to john where Jesus teaches "I and the father are one" claiming divinity, this indicates that the compilation was "universal" meaning containing both groups opposing texts.

fascinating is jesus' response in that story in mark and luke and matthew in which he does not say "do all commandments" to get eternal life- but the opposite! when asked what to DO- he says NOT to kill etc. this indicates that actions in the prophecies from moses are not what earns life- doing them cannot earn the inheritance of life. from the commands- what is important to add to faith is NOT doing the bad. he does not say do "all ten" of commandments, nor "all commandments of the prophecies of moses" nor "do not eat blood"as acts decreed.

additionaly this story is in the context of "which" and does not say obey sabbath nor circumcise nor the ten nor even mention the books of moses.

some claim mark was written for gentiles so no proof unless matthew written for jews agress and this story- without the denial of divinity is in matthew 19- WHICH- and a list not all nor even all ten nor even circumcision- hence jesus fulfilled the prophecy of jeremiah that the new covenant is INTERNAL and not with physical actions. instead NOT acting bad with the faith. 

does this literally mean that if give everything deserves life? jesus often talked in parables and hints so this teaching is not a way to "earn" eternal life but instead indicates the IMPOSSIBILITY of earning with actions- and teaches especially in the context of "not kill steal lie" actions even if he would give all- still do not suffice for one must have faith and this message like others are parable not literal- [as some supporters of communism claim based on this text] because jesus often speaks in hints and parables to teach the lessons.

TRUST a President part 3

for many voters the KEY issue is trust.
the issue sadly is: from two candidates, each with much good, and also with some flaws, the issue is which flaw is "less" bad.
we considered the home computer-server

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-31806907

now consider of the story of:
**Donna Brazile-

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/01/us/politics/donna-brazile-wikileaks-cnn.html
these "help" topple the "neutralaty balance" in favor of one side- clearly unfair-
do we really want a president who "gets ahead" by not playing by the rules?

In addition to Mrs. Clinton's actions- of a computer server at home- these are TRUST issues.
this "work-related" [according to bbc] computer-server is not playing by the rules
"Shortly before she was sworn in as secretary of state in 2009, Hillary Clinton set up an email server at her home in Chappaqua, New York. She then relied on this server, home to the email address hdr22@clintonemail.com, for all her electronic correspondence - both work-related and personal - during her four years in office." source http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-31806907 

can we TRUST this democratic candidate?
even if this candidate would be male- the issue is: look at her actions!

 a vote for trump is- a vote against clinton.

TRUST a President- part 2

for many voters the KEY issue is trust.
the issue sadly is: from two candidates, each with much good, and also with some flaws, the issue is which flaw is "less" bad.
we considered the home server-

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-31806907
in addition to this TRUST issue of Hilary Clinton setting up the computer-server at home, separate from the network and "not playing according to the rules"- we also

should consider of the story of:
***Wasserman Schultz-

http://edition.cnn.com/2016/07/22/politics/dnc-wikileaks-emails/

where the democrats apologized for an apparent issue of "neutrality during the nominating process"-

this is a TRUST issue- how did Mrs. clinton "jockey" herself into position.
it is misleading to say "women haters criticize clinton" because the issue is this specific female democrat. why is there no "good" woman to be nominated?

*consider the story with
***Donna Brazile-

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/01/us/politics/donna-brazile-wikileaks-cnn.html

this is how Mrs. Clinton works and operates-[modus apparande or however you say it].

These in addition to the "work-related" [according to bbc] computer-server: "Shortly before she was sworn in as secretary of state in 2009, Hillary Clinton set up an email server at her home in Chappaqua, New York. She then relied on this server, home to the email address hdr22@clintonemail.com, for all her electronic correspondence - both work-related and personal - during her four years in office." source http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-31806907 

***can we TRUST Hilary? this democratic candidate?
can we trust this specific woman with the ARSENAL of nuclear weapons?
why is there no "good" woman to be nominated? 

 ***a vote for trump is a vote against clinton.

Crown-prince, a poem

The Crown-Prince (and his brothers the princes)

ts

:

Prince Jeffrey will wear

a crown on his head

because ex-King Jed

was found in bed- dead

TRUST a President, PART I

for many voters the KEY issue is trust.

can we trust either of the two candidates?

so- should we not vote at all??

the issue sadly is: from two ["flawed people" i apologize for this misleading phrase what i mean is that nobody is perfect- and not literally as an adjective describing "people". this idea is corected in future posts], which flaw is "less" bad.

there are several issues. this episode considers firstly-

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/03/03/us/politics/hillary-clintons-use-of-private-email-at-state-department-raises-flags.html?_r=0

according to "New York times" Mrs. Clinton did not "play by the rules"

"Mrs. Clinton did not have a government email address during her four-year tenure at the State Department. Her aides took no actions to have her personal emails preserved on department servers at the time, as required by the Federal Records Act."

if the issue is TRUST we must consider that ACCORDING TO BBC-

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-31806907

"Shortly before she was sworn in as secretary of state in 2009, Hillary Clinton set up an email server at her home etc." setting it up in her home separate from the network. 

therefore even if we assume that there were zero [what the current investigations are checking] emails with "illegal" content- -even among the deleted messages- the act to set up this server in her home is a TRUST issue.

A vote for trump is a vote against Hilary.

climate change!--??

although in the US, rain is common in summer and not in winter when rain is replaced by snow, the Mediterranean climate is very different. east of the Mediterranean sea- summer has no rain and spring has very little rain. no "april showers"!

so today i checked the weather in that zone and discovered no rain in october which is unusual.

this whole week called october 9-16 predicts dryness. admittedly there was rain in that zone once, a few weeks ago but there is some change. is it global warming? certainly not.

although some days are hotter- the majority of days are "less hot"

for example: the last week of september had only one "hotter" day relative to average. two days were the same, and 4 less hot. most of that stretch was less hot. even the other days had cooler nights than the average temperature in recent years. 

when the "concerned" and worried scientists try to spread the terror by pointing out the one hotter day most of the humans trust the lie. 

the few instances of resistance, pointing out that most of the week is cooler, is met by the trick phrase "climate change". so you admit that there is climate change- so SPREAD THE TERROR that the world is being destroyed by you driving and by factories etc. but when looking at the average of a week there is no CHANGE either: as a whole, some days are a bit cooler and one day a bit hotter and other days the same.

NO CHANGE. 

so drive your car and see the sights, even for pleasure- "sunday morning go for a ride" as the Beatles sang.

hindu=veda? if so, not re-body.

many years ago i studied about hinduism and one of the important details was that hinduism is founded on texts called veda- there are 4 groups. the rig is one of the vedas.
i also learned the faith in reincarnation and the levels called chaste- if a boy was born in the lower caste that is the "return to body" as a result of the previous life
I did not know until today that the "authoritaive vedas and rig vead" specify that the faith of death is not reincarnate to return to a bodily life but instead go and depart to a place of life this is described several ways and several sources the most fascinating for me is
"quote from translation of rig
in the Rig-Veda he is the king of the departed and the beneficent king of the happy world where the virtuous live and enjoy themselves in after-life. 
end quote
if the veda is true than at death the depart does not reenter a body depending on virtue as the caste system would indicate and refutes the caste sytem that the virtue gets a better caste by birth this is not the veda faith buit it does help control the masses
!!

ezekiel saw wheels and what?

I recently became aware of a book: Blumrich, spaceships of ezekiel

the author had a degree in engineering and worked for nasa.

he somehow reached the conclusion that ezekiel saw a "landing craft".

I strongly disagree with the content at the website "spaceshipsOfEzekiel" which does not describe the book, with that title, fairly but does have some summaries I eyed.

the criticsm of verse 7 most interests me, because the translation matches the text "just fine" and is grammatically accurate. perhaps king james version is different but the hebrew supports "round" and the translators in king james had never seen a landing crafts legs! yet.

the hebrew letters "ogl" can certainly mean round.
the claim "translation error" for verse 7 is only relative to kjv, different- but can be an accurate translation of the hebrew text as preserved in jewish scrolls.
the wheels seem to me in verses 16-17 to describe a large "wheel" that can go in any direction without changing direction the scientific name is a tool used in rockets "gyro-scope" only large enough for a landing craft.

ALSO the comments on page\/ show a wording with a cynical attitude with no "real topic-al challenge"

http://www.spaceshipsofezekiel.com/html/spaceships_of_ezekiel_comments-chap-04.html 

quote: "Oh, WOW! What an absolutely incredible stroke of luck!" this is a very cynical tone. and instead should have NOT WRITTEN this and limited to an attempt to challenge the topic. this demonstrates a bad site- perhaps by religious fanatic losing control.

****I want a site that is fair about the book.

another page that annoys me is the aeronautical direction for "drag".

it seems to me that a craft would cut the air "better" if it was pointy that is what the rocket builders do for going up  pointy cone to cut the air. cutting the air would not slow it down and in fact the craft which nasa uses has a wider base coming down- and is explained to slow it down-

***so the picture on the page seems to me inverted! not just relative to how I understand drag but how nasa uses rockets up and splash-down craft. if you want to have much drag you do not cut.

the picture on this page

http://www.spaceshipsofezekiel.com/html/ships-04-a.html

seems inverted. especially if we translate wheels with four wings as helicopter blades!. and the rest of the site is not worth your time. we need a real summary of the book.

lily and rose

only partialy true but based on a true story- the tale of lily and rose

ts

once upon a time, a young rabbi stumbled in temptation.

he studied at a certaing rabbinic college. he would frequently walk to a certain restaurant to buy a real meat steak. people noticed that he often walked on the same route and a certain woman whose name will be concealed was atttracted to this young man. she saw that he walked energetically and wore a fancy jacket and stylish hat!

one day as he passed she said "you look kind of cute"

he smiled and said "thank you. I must go now."- "where are you going?"- "i want to eat a special meal to celebrate"- "may I join you"- "uh... well... of course!"

 so the two walked together on the street until reaching the restaurant.

they entered together and walked to the counter to order. the rabbi began: "I want the serving of the veal steak sandwich." the man noted and said "I see you want your usuual and what will your order for your date?"

the young rabbi stood- a bit baffled. luckily Zelda [not really!] said "this is not a date I will order for myself just a salad of chopped vegetables."

the young rabbi blushed in awkwardness but smiled at her for saving the situation.

the young rabbi chose a table by the wall and asked if she was okay with that place and she agreed.

from this meeting a young girl named rose would be born and she would grow up and eventually marry lily... to be continued [no more time today]

puma punku rocks

"The stones in Puma Punku are made up of granite and diorite, and the only stone that is harder that those two, is the diamond." source: https://exemplore.com/advanced-ancients/Ancient-Mysteries-Puma-Punku-in-Tiahuanaco

this site is unlike other archeological ruins.

the long video at 

denies that this is the material and accuses "liars" to those who say it is granite

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j9w-i5oZqaQ

who would you believe?

a short zombie movie

I recently saw  "poisoned" 2011
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt2066926/
 a short zombie movie in which an israeli soldier kills other israeli soldiers who are zombies.
it is short but I reccommend it.
if you like what you see, then recommend to your friends
on the topic of zombies: the movie "world war z" was "only a movie" so the criticsm quoted at
http://forward.com/the-assimilator/185456/whats-behind-israels-zombie-outbreak/
is just mere "silly responses trying to incite more hatred" in an unrelated conflict which is totally unrelated to the film
there are other israeli zombie movies too and some are mentioned in that article- if you want to try them

dictators

we all know that dictators do not "fear re-election" and therefore have no motivation to make the voters happy.

often dictators use their power to be cruel to the citizens.

one such example is in syria-

a few years ago, writing called grafiti was found in syria that said something bad about the "president" of syria. this president- as putin emphasized recently "most voters elected" Assad so he was "fairly elected"- admittedly over twenty years ago!! 

an election "term-of-service" has long passed, also over twenty years ago, and no re-election competition has been possible for over twenty years! ino ther words no competition was possible and no re-election granted him the privilige to rule. this is "named president" with the function of a dictator who will rule forever with no competiton.

only the name is president but the termof service ended without renewal- he is like a dictator and certainly without renewal he is not "really truly" president anymore.

what is worse this "acting dictator" has used cruel physical punishment to command the beating of all the school students until they reveal who wrote bad about him.

in countries like the US, everyone writes bad about president obama- but in syria one may not write and until they reveal who was guilty, all the students in a school were beaten. this angered the parents who quickly organized to take weapons from the police and started a revolution called the syrian civil war.

during this "so-called-civil-war" the so-called-elected-president, which as above is just misleading words, was caught using cruel chemical weapons and cruel torture methods- and continues to have the support of russian leader putin who thinks this leader assad is "good" and despite the term ending and no re-election to renew the privilige, is a "valid" leader.

this is very consistent with russian ideas.

when i was a child someone told me that the "US is not the good guys because the CIA has interfered in other countries removing the dictators"

WHAT EXACTLY IS WRONG with that?   dictators are cruel and need to be stopped and punished

as a child I was confused by this accusation and did not know it was coming from a communist propaganda which was consistent with putins curent policy in syria to support a crule "so-vcalled-president" dictator.

"the US should not be policing the world and should not interfere- it is bad for them to interfere"- yet the cruel dictators must be stopped to protect the citizens and child-injurers use the same argumet "do not interfere i can hit and cut my child- it is my child" yet police do interfere and punish crule parents and should punish any parent who injures their child in any injury including the bloody cut called circumcision. dictators should not be "without interference" if it is true that the cia toppled dictators that is a good thing admittedly cia denies involvement and may not be given "credit" for stopping cruel dictators which would be a good thing. the crule must be stopped! tell me "not to interfere" when a terrorist is stabbing people one after the other- my passive assitance is assitin the murderer continue and kill more lives whereas violence to the stabber or the dictator will kill one and save more lives- this is different from murder because it saves lives.

global- nothing

I recently watched an episode about "worried scientists"- these scientists claim that they are "worried" about climate change.

they start by showing us tornadoes- scary! are you convinced already?

next they explain that if there is global warming there will be LESS rotation.

hmm- so less fear of swirly tornadoes - great now i am not worried. scientists who "believe" the lie of gloabal warming and thiose of you who think it is a fact should not be worried.

in fact the idea of global warming is only beneficial in that it gives rich people an excuse to use less electricity not for stinginess but to lessen 'energy use which needs production" to lessen heat...

many people are fooled that the heat of factories and cars adds enough to the heat of the sun to increase gloabl warming. assuming this is true- then less rotation and less tornadoes. more are reported than the many unreported which happened as frequently, as today, in the past.

but really there is no clear indication either way!

some days are hotter than the average of the recent decades. yet in the month of august more of the days were "less hot" than the average for example many days were the same as the average with only two days hotter than average- so less tornadoes.

more of the days ten of twenty days in august were cooler than average so the daily factories and fuel burning and trucks etc. are not adding enough heat to interfere with the slight cooling of august when it should expectedly be hot in the mediteranean area in august. check out how the temperature is "less hot" on most days:

despite the heat of the year in summer and the "added" human heat which doe snot add- most days are cooler-

in august 20 days only two were hotter-

http://www.accuweather.com/he/il/haifa/213181/august-weather/213181

than average yet eight 8 were the same as average and more than 8= ten were less hot.

so is it global warming? it is global- nothing!

an atheistic calendar

Although the average healthy-minded human does not mind-is not disturbed by the submission to the christian religion in many aspects of the calendar- with january etc. and "de facto" that is the calendar used and to avoid disputes and conflicts it is important to continue this usage for contracts, atheists deserve a parallel one for newspapers.

I recently polled atheists and over 60% were "for submitting" to the christian calendar- and that is good for contracts but we also deserve an additional one with fewer flaws.

when deciding the starting point of such a calendar- we must consider that the points in the year when the sun cycles differ from location to location. 

for example the day that is twelve hours long is called sep 25 in washington dc- NOT21 as we are taught.

in paris: sep 25 of 2016 [added day in february of this year] same as in newyork city and even london is close enough.

from sep 25 the light is less which is bad for humans who sleep at night and are active in the day. so that is not a good starting point.

how about march? 16 march in ny=w but not like london and paris!

in paris [and london too] this natural occurence is one day later than the occurenc in washington and new york- the following day called march 17.

http://www.timeanddate.com/sun/france/paris?month=3&year=2016

so using the twelve hour is a problem. unless using the spot of the UN which is NY then march 16 can be the day with 12 and the following day starts the cycle of "more light" despite the fact that before this the days had been getting longer since the shortest day but those had less light so they should not start a cycle.

the months should be numbered "first second etc." no march and mean first from the natural occurrence in the sun cycle which is not march 21 despite what we are taught but either 16 or 17 depending on location as demonstrated.

only 5 months need an extra day! 12 months of 30 days with five longer months with an extra day=31 suffice. not like the gregorian which has too many long months and when submitting to christians october seems strange as in previous post.

first from the first day of longer light is named "first or 1" and 30 days.

2,4,6,8,10 are the 5 longer months with an extra day for 31 and all the rest are 30 unless the natural occurence is a day later- in which case a day can be added to the twelfth month to start the cycle with the day with more light. 

inaccuracies in the game

when i was youger, i would play a game called "risk" a war game that depended on luck if the dice showed higher numbers you won the battle. i would roll dice which showed lower numbers and lost.

later I played a war game with the opposite rule- the odds of success were for a lower number 1 or 2 dots. i hoped based on my past experience that since my dice showed high numbers in one game they would show the same in the other game but in risk they showed low and i lost. so I swapped the dice and found that when i rolled the dice for risk the same dice which showed high now showed low and the same dice which in risk showed low- when i played the other game showed high and i lost!

the other game has many things that I feel are very inaccurate. the way i see it these inaccuracies benefit the "allies" of london-moscow-washington.

hawaii is very far from west US- yet a transport can move two moves in a turn from west coast to hawaii to wake! this is unusually far. the atlantic which is 40 degrees around needs two transport moves so i suggest a compromise- all sea zones are much bigger- halfway to the hawaii size- but not as big as the benefit of hawaii! which would allow a bomber from washington to get to hawaii in one turn of four zones. if a transport can get from west US to wake then it is very unfair that tokyo cannot send artilery to solomon islandgroup in two transport moves in one turn in fact the difference is so fast that hawaii must have an empty zone between the west US and hawaii because it is so much further! than tokyo-solomon!

similarly washington can land a transport in west africa in one move and return on the same move to make the seazones closer to the hawaii idea yet the hawaii is so far from the west coast that it is not accurate.

other changes are: japan can reach midway in one move and return the same turn.

south of tokyo is phil. and caroline:

|ma|  T.     |mi|sea      |w.U.

e.c.|ph.|  ca.| wa.|ha.|sea|neutral me.

  |bo.|N.G.|so.|sea

sea|Au.     |NZ|sea

allowing tokyo to send artilery or tanks from tokyo to new giunea or solomon in two transprt moves in the same turn- compromising with the hawii status which is so very far that a zone must be added to be accurate and not give an advantage of the bomber reaching hawaii. it can reach west africa because that is nearer!

borneo is west of philipines and philipines can go southwest to bo. or southeast to NG.

mexico and braizl were neutral until 1945 so it is inaccurate to give washington these five potential units. an advantage to the allies which is not fair because it is not accurate.

if australia is one zone- unlike risk division then 7 million square kilometers is one zone- if so undeveloped jungles and desert in africa should be the same size with 30 msk in four zones- of 7msk and not seven zones. the jungles and desert are not developed and should not give london 6 potential only the bigger zones can be worth one potential so all of africa would give london 1+1+2+2=6 for the whole africa. a tank in egypt can go one to jo-berg and return the second move in the same turn.

similarly in russia called tundra these plains are not developed and should be australia size controlling the east coast controls a zone of 7msk so if we accept the conversion of one a+1a and 1 t that is two artillery and one tank in the same zone like australia. south russia would include the other 7 msk leaving 3 msk for the moscow and causus and leningrad zones. total zones 5 with potential 3+3+8+2+2=18 giving moscow more potential for plains in tundra is inaccurate and gives allies more power- a bias to assist the allies which is not real. it is worth two because it includes the bigger size. so the game gives much more potential to the allies when converting the situation at that time is unrealistically helping the allies. similarly granting london potential for jungles and desert in africa is inaccurate giving the allies production which is not fair nor acuurate. in contrast to europe which is developed. these are my complaints about the game- the allies would still win but less inaccurate.

october=octagon

why is september the ninth month?

if we call october like octagon then 8 and sept should be seven yet we call october "ten"??

we are born into a world with a  calendar which calls 1 to january. however, the names preserve a different calendar. ten conflicts the name for october and december. december is now the last moth of the year- but not when it was named.

the twelfth month of the year was named february and the added day 2/29 was added before the new year started in march [not somewhere in the middle of the year]. such as in 2016 day added before the new year began- this matches josephus that "the year begins" in spring- not only the jewish year as in exodus demonstrating the pharisees believed in the bible and not in the mishna which they claim existed orally yet deny- "years are counted from fall" in mishna but pharisees rejected that oral tradition until later jews abandoned tradition and made fall the new year for years but also the calendar started in spring as preserved in the name october: 

march was the first month- so ap=2, ma=3, ju=4, ju=5, aug=6, se=7, oc=8 like octagon, no=9, dec=10 like decimal is a ten-based system and two more months until the twelfth month february that is how the months were named. 

later jesus followers kept the names but changed the starting point to jesus birth in the end of december and then it stopped being the tenth month- yet the name was the same this causes a conflict! dec is for ten like decimal!

now it seems odd to add a day in the second month but that is because the christians changed the start point to jesus-day in december to start the year. the tenth month became the twelfth but the name was not changed. originaly october was the eighth month like octogan before jesus followers changed and the day was added to leap years the day before the new year began before march first. the calandar is called julian because of julius ceasar- so those who say julius added a month for july is a problem because he founded the calendar- and a twelve month calendar is easy to divide into quarters and thirds in contrats to a ten or eleven month calendaar a compromise is that augustus "changed-name" of one month to his own name or not.

time - correction

I must try to correct a conflict regarding the issue of time

\

"Because an observer on the ground sees the satellites in motion relative to them, Special Relativity predicts that we should see their clocks ticking more slowly (see the Special Relativity lecture). Special Relativity predicts that the on-board atomic clocks on the satellites should fall behind clocks on the ground by about 7 microseconds per day because of the slower ticking rate due to the time dilation effect of their relative motion." source:  http://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/~pogge/Ast162/Unit5/gps.html

conflict: in my previous post a quoted the idea [link below] which i saw in sci-fi and was supported by a link- which i quoted: that less gravity means faster time passage. 

two days later i saw an episode of national geographic showing that atomic clocks in orbit are slower! the opposite of less gravity time faster than the surface the clock is slower- less gravity seems to slow time! and i search and see ohiio state said the same! quioted above "clocks on the satellites should fall behind clocks on the ground" yet if surface gravity is greater than the clock on the ground should fall behind. in an episode of hawkings he said on the mountain the clock is faster so going down the mountain is going to the past or future?

if surface gravity is greater them mountain and the clock on the satellite fall behind the clock on earth then less gravity force means slower time or else the clock on the surface would show an earlier time than the clock above!

if so the moment before matter began in the "big bang" there would have been zero gravity and infinitely less gravity is like the clock on the satellite- falling behind infinitely slower and no time would pass.

for the opposing view

http://tomsawyerssongs.blogspot.co.il/2016/08/can-time-be-measured.html

what is true??

see also:

http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/news/science/wonderquest/2003-04-03-space-clock.htm

steaks and shakes!

steaks with shakes

ts

:

I enjoy a meal

of yummy beef steak

coolled-off  we will feel

we'll drink a milk-shake!

note: during the hot summer, a cold chocolate milk shake feels good! and other flavors too! enjoy one with your beef steak! 

can time be measured?

can time be measured?

we do measure time and call the increments by names such as minutes hours etc. yes time can be measured.

this fact does not bother people who try to write "cool sounding ideas" such as "the elements of space and time canot be measured". how poetic and misleading. the passage of time between events is measurable because time is measurable. quantity.

when was the beginning of time?

this question is stupid because first we must ask "wes there a beginning".

only religious who claim god created time can claim that before the creation of time there was no time or as one website said "there was  no before' prior to" the creation of time.

if one hour ago i startr=ed to count one hour then by now one hour passed.

if infinite a started to count then infinite hours passed.

simple logic.

adding math-words to the sentence is not any better- consider shooting light at a mirror- if the source moves then the light will not 'return straight back' but will pass where the source was. if it is shot at an angle then the light could pass the new place of the train but then the distance is measurable and in fact "the same as what the observer outside the train sees as well as the one inside" who has moved to the new place.

yet somehow that does not bother Tianlu who wrote : "Imagine now, that we're in a train moving at constant velocity $v$ and we point a beam of light upwards towards a mirror that then reflects the beam directly back down.  In our frame (train frame) the light will have traveled a distance of $d=2h$ in a time $t=d/c$.  BUT an observer outside the train would see that the light has traveled greater than $2h$because the train will have moved as well." at quora site.

adding math-words to the sentence is not any better, as we can see. if the mirror is in the train then the distance is so small [to the roof of the train] that that the light jumped from the source and back before the train moved because TRAINS TRAVEL SLOWER THAN LIGHT. if the mirror is high above the train then the light would miss because time passed and the light moved through space.

in sci-fi time is shown as slower near a black hole. the observer from a distace sees the people nearer to the black hole as moving slower than themselves.

the theory is that time raltes to the mass of the matter. if the mass is great then time is slow whereas in weaker gravity time is faster.
to demonstarte: in weaker gravity if i go sixty miles per hour  the hour passed faster- relative to the hour in stronger gravity. in both places we traveled sixty miles because an hour passed but the hour was longer in the more intense gravity.

assuming this is true when two people decide to sleep separately for eight hours and one is on a mountain, then the eight hours- although being 8 is "less than" the eight hours on the surface. if there would be no matter then there would be zero mass and time would not pass because it would be infintely less gravity and time "would pass" infinitely faster! which is just silly words.

if we imagine the moment of the big bang- all the mass would be "together" much greater gravity force than any of the separate black holes matter because the total of those matters and more were at the point of the big bang grapefruit or whatever. if so time would be infinitely slow and there would be no after for the matter to "bang" out over time. 

andrew explains at stackexchange "your clock would stop" near a black hole- and if so- certainly more at the greater mass at the mass before the big bang.

compare http://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/25759/how-exactly-does-time-slow-down-near-a-black-hole

so people who believe in science would have the problem of "no after" if the mass were truly in one spot before the big bang. time would be infinitely slow- which they deny because there was an after. yet if physics are true then there is no after and at the same time religionists say there is "no before". i think we must combine both views into one fact: there is no before and there is also no after!

religion causes more suffering

in the heat of the summer we are warned that it is even more IMPORTANT than usual to drink more water every day! 

we need the water to sweat in the hot summer besides the normal usual need. however some isolated religious people do not know about "water needs" and are not aware of dietitians recommendations. they only measure importance if you DIE- then it is important.

the issue is not if you will die- but is the action correct. 

if I do not pay my mortgage for many months- "you won't die" from that! does that mean it is relatively unimportant? this is not an accurate way to measure importance! the correct action is to pay the loan! what is the correct action.

the problem is when these isolated religious people are taught to deny themselves water on a hot day. i do not mean the burden on ambulances- they wont die from a day without water! so who cares? the issue is not will they die. that is not the issue but what does a body need in the summer. well if you will not die you do not desperately need it!

anyway- with this excuse they teach the isolated students that two of the hottest days in the summer when we educated people know that there is GREAT IMPORTANCE to drink plenty of water on a hot summer day- because we do not measure "based only on what kills you" but what does a human body need daily- 

they must deny themselves water. despite the fact that these are summer days when we need the water to sweat and other needs, religion insists that summer--

SUMMER when it is very hot- is the time to deny yourself even water and no water at all- for the whole day! the isolated students are taught not even brush the teeth because that would RISK the sin of swallowing a drop of water on a day when it is bad to drink according to the jewish religion. 

these misguided young students are isolated and taught to deny the most basic need- we know it is a need- despite the trick above- to deny water! on two of the hottest summer days each year!

in fact these are the longest days- in the northern hemisphere- so the water is forbidden for around fourteen hours and perhaps even earlier in the morning too!

to comprehend just how long the day is in the summer in jerusalem- more than 14 hours! the latest sunsets of the year. and this especially long time is the time chosen by religious leaders to "fast" with no food nor water- for the longest time possible all year. it is so hot people barely have an appetite! and that is the heat which necessitates DRINKING WATER!! in jerusalem today the temperature is 96 ninety-six degrees fahrenheit! measured locally as 36 centigrade. we know how hot this feels!

in this intense heat the isolated students have no one to explain to them that the body needs water daily and even more so when the day is the hottest of the summer days!

they are isolated by the rabbis and encouraged to stay isolated- this gaurantees they will never know that it is important to drink water every day.

the rabbis respond "big deal you did not die."

but this is wrong and misleading.

at least in the southern hemisphere things are the reverse! these two "fast" days with no water are the short days! in australia the shortest days are in june- less than ten hours in the summer. colder days 16 degrees centigrade- much cooler than the jerusalem 36 c mentioned!

to ensure that jews in australia also suffer- the rabbis have a winter fast day when the day in jerusalem is short- and the opposite in the southern hemisphere! they will suffer in the december HEAT for the many hours of the longest days! 

***and we thought being a chosen people was something "better"- jews are losers! they deny themselves even water, on the hottest days, for the longest days in both hemispheres, of the planet!

instead drink water every day!

we can clearly see the cruelty of the rabbis- no surprise then that they also - consistent with cruelly increasing suffering- also encourage circumcision without any medical need...

UFO over Jerusalem (twenty years)

many people feel that Jerusalem is a "magical" city. although many have reported unidentified spaceships over many cities, one over jerusalem is an even more sensational story.

here we are in the summer, twenty summers after an apparently alien spaceship shot across the jerusalem sky. I am skeptical but regardless: here is the story of the eye-witness named naptali:

naptali was named for a biblical character naptali. he had suffered another hot summer day, and now that the sun had set he decided to go out for a walk in the elevated city of jerusalem in the hope of cooling off.

"I walked in the hot night. when I heard a whoosh from above, I instinctively turned to look at the noise- yet the sky was empty. no wing-lights! the sound was like the sound of a jet-plane racing overhead. when you hear a jet- the sound gets to the ear long after the jet has moved away from the place it made the sound. 

I remembered, years before I had heard the same jet whoosh and looked up at what seemed to be the source of the sound and that part of the sky was empty. a few "degrees" to the side, of that place, a small whitish "minus-sign" moved silently and slowly -as it appeared. it was probably flying 500 miles per hour or more! yet appeared slowly [objects far away move a "long distance" which seems smaller] moving across the sky. silently. 

sound came from a different part of the sky- the whoosh of the jet reaching his ears long after the plane was not there anymore and had moved away.

based on this experience I now searched the sky for the lights of a jet around the area, but saw no wing-lights. only a few scattered stars. suddenly one star- which had seemed like every other star without movement- moved! it moved quickly across the sky! if it was a human jet it would need to move constantly and not seem like a star! now it moved much faster than the jet I had watched as a child!"

he waited for the whoosh- for the sound-waves to reach his ears from the great height of the sky! and waited and waited! it must be extremely high! for the sound took so very long to come down to his ears. if the height is so much, then the jet should have appeared even slower! more than a minute passed and no sound! human technology at high speed makes a sound- the whoosh we hear from jets and at even faster speeds- as this plane moved quickly! the boom is even louder we know it is a sonic boom!

to go that fast silently must be alien technology! because humans cannot do it."

naptali asked others if they saw a star move and no-one believed him. 

say "I am skeptical" even naptali also says so! but inside- he believes!

3600 reads! the readers get the credit!

over 3600 reads! the readers get the credit! t

shirley or hilary?

I know of at least one person who wants to vote for hilary clinton "because men will not vote for a woman so a woman needs to be president"-- is hilary the "right woman" among females?

gender cannot be the "only" criteria!

both hilary clinton and donald trump have flaws and the issue is which one is "lesser of the two evils"- not which one is a female.

what is she representing and what has she acted until now.

I know of at least one person who insisted to vote obama only because "obama is "black" and the blacks deserve to have one of them as president" end quote- was he the "right" one from that race? why not shirley both female and from the minority race? or Condoleeza Rice or the "right" one from that race?

the real issue is not "support the one who will suffer discrimination" becuase first we must decide is that nominee good? or not. 

the MOST IMPORTANT complaint regarding female nominees is the complaint that until hilary- for the past ten attempts there have been ZERO women nominees for the democrats since shirly in 1972!

only male nominees- ONLY MALE NOMINEES- this is not a political party that deserves support if you are trying to BALANCE discrimination! IF THAT IS YOUR FACTOR/DECIDING-ISSUE.

shirley was good enough to be elected to congress and even nominated- for the democrats yet people decided she was not "the right one" from that race called african-americans and not the "right one" from the non-males!  

the complaint is not "why have their been no lady presidents" but the complaint TRULY IS why is the democratic party SO INTENSELY anti-women that the last ten attempts since shirley in 1972 there have been zero women nominees besides hilary

!!!

only men about twenty men- yet only men.

that is a political party that deserves no support when they finally "try a woman again"- unless hilary has done something that represents you. not "only because a woman". if she was the "right woman" i would support "even" a woman- but the democrats do not give us female nominees!

who represents you more? the nominee from the repulicans or the nominee of the democrats?

both have flaws! which is the "lesser of the two evils"--!

we must COMPLAIN that the democrats have offered no female nominees besides hilary for the past ten attempts since 1972- and that is why no women were president- the cause: no female nominees! and in 2008 hilary lost the primary- so why do we think now is different?

unless we forgot/ignore that she lost the primaries in 2008- well remember!

racism in the name

if we would accuse and condemn israel for "racism in the name" we would need  to equally condemn several nations:

egypt has an official name focusing on the arabic race giving a homeland for arabs based on the distinction of race " officially the Arab Republic of Egypt,"

base we would equally condemn the guilt of the arabs and the jews for making racist states with a name showing the distinction of the arab race or the jewish race. yet those who criticise the "jewish" state only accuse the jew demonstrating that they are jew haters and do not really care about the name. the same privilige for egypt to have a race in its name for equality the same for jews in fact denying jew the same prigilige that egypt has would be the bad racism giving jews fewer priviliges and blaming the name of the "jewish state" which in practice has freedom of pluralistic religion.

in fact the name uis "the state of israel"and although it is a jewish state the name is less guilty than the arabs because the name does not have any racial distinction in contrast to arabic egypt so we need to put pressure on arabs to be less racist and end this bad evil racial discrimination.

continuing with religion: what about the name sof iran and pakistan?

officially the Islamic Republic of Pakistan,

religion has been emphasized in the name with a distinction for muslims this is bad discrimination even israel does not have jewish in its name and as mentioned in practice granted freedom of pluralistic religion!  the israeli government even gives money to all religions which even pluralistic US does not fund religion separating "church from state" yet the sate of israel is not a "jewish" exclusive state which in fact funds both jewish religion and other religions and has multiracial parliament clalled knesset.

the same for iran instead of accusing only israel showing jew-hate, we should be pressuring the arabs and muslims ro remove the distinction from their names because even israael does not have "jewish" in the name so iran pakistan and egypt are the only ones with blatant bad discrimnation.

in practice the jewish state does not exclude and has allowed in albaniam refugees even offering them cirtizenship because it is not based on race but is based on equality.

what about the law of return? that is not the issue of the name! when the issue is the name the only ones discriminating are arabs and  muslims which accurately proclaim in the name the discrimination active in those countries.

so what about the law of return? russia and germany have similar laws of return and equality is just as russia and germany can have law of return for famiies of ethnic russians the jew is the same and equal. to say that the jew is bad would be discrimination.

one can accuse together "both russia germany and israel are bad for having laws of return" however the accusers only blame israel- demonstrating the jew-hate.

the focus on helping palestinians is extremely important and separate from any other "suffering ethnicity" because they are unique in making the jew look bad which is the main effort of involvement in those arabs called palestinians a way to demonstrate jew hatred with a disguise.

the baby song

http://tomsawyerssongs.blogspot.co.il/2014/06/the-baby-song.html

I now present: the baby song

TS

:

Babies are so perfect

 their bodies look like ours

I hate it when they cry

 for hours and hours

when a baby is born

its lungs are pretty-pink

 if he is a smoker

they turn as black as ink

Babies are so perfect

 their bodies look like ours

I hate it when they cry

 for hours and hours

Babies have 2 kidneys

 maybe one is enough

but please do not cut off

ANY- healthy stuff

Babies are so perfect

 their bodies look like ours

I hate it when they cry

 for hours and hours

 MORAL

the skin, removed by routine infant circumcision, is not cancer which must be removed, but rather it is healthy skin which provides a layer of protection, among other purposes.

removing the foreskin removes a layer of protection!

although modern medicine in the USA does circumcision, they do admit QUOTE "The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) in 2012 reviewed all the evidence about male infant circumcision and concluded that the health benefits of circumcision are not great enough to recommend routine circumcision" 

Despite the list of benefits there, which cutters love to read and quote from, I still see the words 

"not recommend"

source

http://jama.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleid=1730514

jama=Journal of American Medical Association