I must try to correct a conflict regarding the issue of time
\
"Because an observer on the ground sees the satellites in motion relative to them, Special Relativity predicts that we should see their clocks ticking more slowly (see the Special Relativity lecture). Special Relativity predicts that the on-board atomic clocks on the satellites should fall behind clocks on the ground by about 7 microseconds per day because of the slower ticking rate due to the time dilation effect of their relative motion." source: http://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/~pogge/Ast162/Unit5/gps.html
conflict: in my previous post a quoted the idea [link below] which i saw in sci-fi and was supported by a link- which i quoted: that less gravity means faster time passage.
two days later i saw an episode of national geographic showing that atomic clocks in orbit are slower! the opposite of less gravity time faster than the surface the clock is slower- less gravity seems to slow time! and i search and see ohiio state said the same! quioted above "clocks on the satellites should fall behind clocks on the ground" yet if surface gravity is greater than the clock on the ground should fall behind. in an episode of hawkings he said on the mountain the clock is faster so going down the mountain is going to the past or future?
if surface gravity is greater them mountain and the clock on the satellite fall behind the clock on earth then less gravity force means slower time or else the clock on the surface would show an earlier time than the clock above!
if so the moment before matter began in the "big bang" there would have been zero gravity and infinitely less gravity is like the clock on the satellite- falling behind infinitely slower and no time would pass.
for the opposing view
what is true??
see also:
אין תגובות:
הוסף רשומת תגובה