we all know that dictators do not "fear re-election" and therefore have no motivation to make the voters happy.
often dictators use their power to be cruel to the citizens.
one such example is in syria-
a few years ago, writing called grafiti was found in syria that said something bad about the "president" of syria. this president- as putin emphasized recently "most voters elected" Assad so he was "fairly elected"- admittedly over twenty years ago!!
an election "term-of-service" has long passed, also over twenty years ago, and no re-election competition has been possible for over twenty years! ino ther words no competition was possible and no re-election granted him the privilige to rule. this is "named president" with the function of a dictator who will rule forever with no competiton.
only the name is president but the termof service ended without renewal- he is like a dictator and certainly without renewal he is not "really truly" president anymore.
what is worse this "acting dictator" has used cruel physical punishment to command the beating of all the school students until they reveal who wrote bad about him.
in countries like the US, everyone writes bad about president obama- but in syria one may not write and until they reveal who was guilty, all the students in a school were beaten. this angered the parents who quickly organized to take weapons from the police and started a revolution called the syrian civil war.
during this "so-called-civil-war" the so-called-elected-president, which as above is just misleading words, was caught using cruel chemical weapons and cruel torture methods- and continues to have the support of russian leader putin who thinks this leader assad is "good" and despite the term ending and no re-election to renew the privilige, is a "valid" leader.
this is very consistent with russian ideas.
when i was a child someone told me that the "US is not the good guys because the CIA has interfered in other countries removing the dictators"
WHAT EXACTLY IS WRONG with that? dictators are cruel and need to be stopped and punished
as a child I was confused by this accusation and did not know it was coming from a communist propaganda which was consistent with putins curent policy in syria to support a crule "so-vcalled-president" dictator.
"the US should not be policing the world and should not interfere- it is bad for them to interfere"- yet the cruel dictators must be stopped to protect the citizens and child-injurers use the same argumet "do not interfere i can hit and cut my child- it is my child" yet police do interfere and punish crule parents and should punish any parent who injures their child in any injury including the bloody cut called circumcision. dictators should not be "without interference" if it is true that the cia toppled dictators that is a good thing admittedly cia denies involvement and may not be given "credit" for stopping cruel dictators which would be a good thing. the crule must be stopped! tell me "not to interfere" when a terrorist is stabbing people one after the other- my passive assitance is assitin the murderer continue and kill more lives whereas violence to the stabber or the dictator will kill one and save more lives- this is different from murder because it saves lives.
אין תגובות:
הוסף רשומת תגובה