I like the idea that ploughshare fund set a goal to limit nuclear weapons- specifically for Iran where organized demonstrators call other countries satan and devil.
I am sad that they write it as if all countries should disarm-
this is complicated so i will use analaogy-
because if the "enslavers" [in quotes and defined below] desire nukes then the "freedom of the citizen" countries need it as a deterrent-
kind of like the idea in fictional stargate series where the "super technology" which could be used to fight the "enslavers" and not only weapon-
but specifically to free- FREE
tokra can [with tolin season three pretense] remove a gouaould enslaver while preserving the host lives- in contrast to humans- who lack the technology to free the host from slavery [remember season one kowalski?]- and it is frustrating that such technology is not used to free the slaves...
**my point is if personal freedom is important and valued, then it is frustrating that such technology is not used to free the enslaved hosts-
similarly when the leaders of islam quote the will of allah to change other people and decide for them that is a degree of slavery- and we see the actions using even violence against the "satan" who allows muslims to choose- at all- such as america and other democracies- because some choose to sin against islam- hence the name "satan"
and having powerful weapons assists that- in contrast to freedom of the citizen- a western value.
the public has a right to know (as published dr gabriela barzin 17 august page 28 in israel hayom) ploughshares has representatives for removing sanctions on iran-
admittedly they claim "we are anti-nuke and the agreement limits iran nuclear" yet sanctions also limit-
sanctions also limit if that is a goal the continue sanctions and make them harsher- yet more relevant than sanctions is the issue that this specific agreement has problems-
for example the iranian military bases are denied inspection and other numerous "concessions" and issues- which top officials are revealing to the public
the claim "this agreement limits irans nuclear therefore anti-nuke should support" is debatable because there are holes in the agreement as many congress-members are pointing out-
and the "watchdog of democracy" called news media reported that john kerry complained- the details are "classified" ! why the need to make treaty-details classified? demonstrating a need to hide from the congresspeople what they will vote about -- can that be ? jesus christ !
and if ploughshare fund would be- as they say "to secure a more peaceful world, including one free of nuclear weapons" as an important issue-
http://www.ploughshares.org/about-us
as mentioned i challenge the wording there-
yet even in their own goal i expect them to be more careful about removing iranian sanctions and about funding j-street which also pushes for removing iranian sanctions-
because we must learn from past experience from the actions of iran-representatives until now- we must look at the actions of the iranian representatives- connections with hezbolla and other issues and comprehend how they have used violence until now. I will contact them.
אין תגובות:
הוסף רשומת תגובה