alternate ending for parents

to parents: i recommend renting the video "inside out" 2015 for your kids to enjoy.

i do think that the ending is good- yet there could be an alternate ending-

when her mobile phone rings, she could "fear" going back, and remember her parents hit her (when she was bad), and feel "anger" that they would be mad, for her leaving without permission and continue on the bus ride back to- her best friend-

[oops plot incompatibility- she was mad at her best friend- so delete that scene]

to her best-friends house in minnisota.

on the way the phone rings again and this time she answers and says "i want my old life back"

mom: "i was worried about you, are you hurt?"

"Only that you made me move" 

"you are so gonna get it"

so she hangs up and calls her best friend who helps her register for foster in her home city. 

the end

how about that for a happy ending- and a moral to parents who scare their kids away... but adults would not watch the film- so i write the alternate ending for adults.

circumcision and medical associations

The Royal Dutch Medical Society, The British Medical Association, the Canadian Pediatric Society, and the Royal Australian College of Physicians have all made official policy statements against circumcision. The American Academy of Pediatrics, the American Medical Association, the American Academy of Family Physicians, and the American Urological Association all do not recommend circumcision,
for source and quotes of each country
http://intactwiki.org/wiki/Position_statements_on_infant_circumcision

Britain

"The BMA considers that the evidence concerning health benefits from non-therapeutic circumcision is insufficient for this alone to be a justification for doing it." ~The British Medical Association

and more

informed decisions

more and more parents are deciding to reject the opinion of cutting a baby- circumcision
doctors in modern countries such as Britian published:

Britain

"The BMA=[British Medical Association] considers that the evidence concerning health benefits from non-therapeutic circumcision is insufficient for this alone to be a justification for doing it." ~The British Medical Association

for source and quotes of each country: http://intactwiki.org/wiki/Position_statements_on_infant_circumcision 

and more

some are fooled into cutting their child based on the story of abraham- and do this painful procedure despite believing in the new testament and despite being "non-jew"= if we are the seed of abraham cut- when the new testament said not to cut several times.

many christians do the covenant of abraham despite believing that the covenant for them is the covenant of jesus-

and the holy letters [epistles] of paul explicitly warned several times to stay in the same status and not cut yourself- and similarly the child is born in the natural state- so do not cut-

it is natural to have a foreskin-

for more information

http://intactwiki.org/wiki/Main_Page

and the collection of articles-

so parents can make an informed decision-

aware of the pain and dangers and risks-

http://intactwiki.org/wiki/Articles_from_Intactipedia

BEFORE making  a PERMANENT CHANGE to your child's body with a CRUEL PAINFUL PROCEDURE followed by THE PAIN during the days of healing-

get information and choose natural for the right reasons 

more and more parents are informed and decide to reject the opinion of those saying cut- 

circumcision is dangerous and harms the baby-

and worse when things go "unexpectedly"

so be informed

just as you spend time to find the best "deal" on strollers etc. 

make an informed decision about circumcision-

millions in europe have foreskin- and they are "fine" there is no "wave" of rare cancers striking all the men with foreskins- and their wives- as if cancer would spread from a foreskin-

but the cutters will use tricks to convonce parents to be like them so they will stop "feeling" damaged.

creationism

1 in response to a thought provoking fictional-episode:

2
biblical ideas have strongly and greatly influenced our culture-

this generation of americans was born into a culture with christian values- 

to demonstrate just how much influence-
SUBJECT: HIT

in the US many states- almost 20 in 2014- specifically permit the hitting of a child-

and in the span of the last three decades (from 1985-2015) many states have finally abolished this immoral biblical idea-
in the past I have questioned here "if the quran is noble" and "if the bible is holy" and now I focus on 2 specific concepts.

hittng kids for "education" and punishment-

around twenty states abolished hits in the past three decades and only five "moral" states showed that they achieved "moral enlightenment" sooner than the others- in the period before 1985

I did not know how severe the situation was !!

it tears my heart TEARS MY HEART to consider the pain of physical beatings multiplied by thousands of students-

"A federal data analysis found that on average, one child is hit in public school every 30 seconds somewhere in the United States." (September 2014)

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/answer-sheet/wp/2014/09/18/19-states-still-allow-corporal-punishment-in-school/

by teachers for education and punishment-

[besides the student to student violence- not the subject of this article]

consider "in school" which means that the annual/yearly average is "thinned" because during summer vacation-months, zero students are in school- the rate of paddling the kids during the school year is that much more frequent- gasp

also consider "public school" where there is supervision-
only god knows how much more pain in "private schools" of christians and jews- who obey proverbs and mishna [also mentioned in a previous post about "fantastic four" please see later- link provided]-

parents often grant permission for teachers to paddle the children

"In many places, parental permission is required and often given"

in this century- from the year 2000 [anno domini] pennsylvania and delaware still allowed paddling the kids- a cruel immoral and painful method- [which i condemn]
until finally like new-mexico they abolished- in contrast to their "more moral" neighboring state "new-jersey" which abolished the immoral christian concept as early as 1867 following the end of the civil war- at least in public schools-
would you send your child to a school where they can have pain?
of course not- unless the exception of religious pain-
influenced by religion- we see that religion is powerful enough to convince us to pain our child and even influence non-christians- gasp

3
I beg you all to take the side of protecting kids, and anti-pain, and spread the word to parents and your state senators- check if your state is moral yet, and protest immoral pain.
I am convinced that pain is bad and harmful and even immoral
can this be supported scientifically?
obviously pain is observable and measurable-
the same way "experts" of nutrition have studied and listed "good" foods versus "bad" foods in the spectrum between:
beneficial "nutricious" food and harmful "poisons"-
which our culture forbids mixing into foods-
in the same way we can study and classify the activities which are "beneficial" and which "harmful" to the people of a society and ban the "poison" of pain activities.
!!
this is what is occurring when a state abolished the immoral christian idea- and can be performed in other states and for other harmful activities.

4
it shocks me that christians apply a message, from the book called "proverbs", while ignoring the traditional name of the book "proverbs"- this message is a proverb and proverbs are not literal and not as written but like Aesops fables and the hebrew name for the book mashal is even more clear-

we hit animals to train them- and animal rights people protest that- but kids are different-
they should not be hit but there is no outcry NO OUTCRY to protect kids- so I provide a link to one such moral group- below.

this is even more shocking when we consider that all the other ideas in the jewish bible like the jewish holidays in leviticus (23) are only for jews- christians do not celebrate yom kippur etc. yet somehow pain to children-

is the one they selected and preferred- over all the others as an exception-

christian society shows by its actions that "everything in the
old testament is  f o r  j e w s  o n l y   and we are not jews" except pain for kids-

that concept is the one which the religious leaders prefer-

yet pain is bad and immoral.

the faith in a creator [book genesis] led to the belief that some books are holy and therefore god himself commands parents/teachers to hit their child

5
SUBJECT: HIT = CREATION
as much as the idea of hitting kids had spread through the US and existed for centuries and widespread- until finally many states- finally are abolishing the law which permitted corporal/body punishment- and "New Mexico, in 2011" abolished this permission-

the following site shows: when states abolished the christian idea of pain to children and other relevant information from the year 2008 [around seven years ago].

http://www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0934191.html

***as of 2014 "19 states still allow children to be hit in public school," and considering that pain is bad and immoral I strongly condemn this culture-
american culture is bad. there are worse cultures as well. and the cause is the devil called the bible and religion.

***my point is- mainly to encourage you to protect children and condemn religion based on its cruel evil fruit- however the point of this example is something else-
these statistics demonstrate the great and strong influence the bible has on our culture-
while adults comprehend that pain to an adult is BAD-
no adult should hit an adult nor pain an adult
somehow pain of kids is "somehow different"-

pain of kids is what god commanded- in a f-ing proverb ! and to the people of moses-
but who cares about such details-

this lengthy discussion is all to describe how american society was impacted by the powerful influence of the bible- on that culture- it demonstrates just how widespread belief in the faith that "god created the earth"
so when you do not hear about the horrors performed by the slaves of islam- and then hear a bit of the pain performed in the name of islam- do not think american culture is "moral" or even less cruel- because 19 states still allow cruelty and
***america lacks a "moral government decision" to demand states to "stop/end pain in the name of religion" in america.

6
therefore when we want to offer an alternative to creation performed by god

the alternative will be similar to what is "common" belief

on this background- the origin of life [different from origin of "species", darwins book]- instead of "god did it" - we search for something more "plausible" and able to believe-

it is bound to be similar to the common belief-

the sentence "god created the world" only loses the word "god" and becomes the earth formed- without god-
we must use familiar concepts- and we ARE familiar with gravity-
this itself is under the influence of the bible- it is bad to "drive under the influence" of alcohol=dui because dui is dangerous for the driver and the people around the dui. similarly influence of the bible- to continue...
so we apply what is "near and close to" our experience-
and imagine that the matter "curved" the space around it [called gravity force] so other matter gathered and the earth was formed-
it is not "near" our experience to say a human created the planet-

similarly when we discuss living cells which reproduce new cells R and have a metabolism M of absorbing and changing the molecules from what enters- to what is "needed"- [single celled bacteria as well as a multi-celled organism like a human]-

the choices are: god made life or something similar- life formed without god-
we apply what is "near and close to our experience"
in science we observe minor changes-
therefore "near our experience" is to suggest "minor changes" from matter and after many "phases" became life- that can absorb molecules and change them to what the cell needs- just without the god bit

when we hear the theory of some scientists- life on earth because existing life was brought and "seeded" the earth- by other life-forms, why do we reject that? it is bad because it is not "near" our experience.

7
if you have a headache from this long article do not fear- the next part is easier and hopefully more pleasant-
on this background we can analyze a fictional episode of stargate- there are many good ones but for now i focus on creationism

the stargate fictional realm has life-forms taking slaves- both a slave body to serve as host [the takers live in the hosts] and slaves to serve other purposes- and bring them from planet to planet- [for example when the defeat of ra was imminent, therefore humans were transferred so they could be farmed to serve the enslavers]

in this specific episode we meet aliens who believe in creation

CREATION

god told them that he created them on that planet-
admittedly god in that realm is a limited non-god who cannot create-
and is not "true" even for that specific group of "non-hosts".
anyway that is what the people believe, although this is in conflict with the other faith of that planet that life was brought from another planet- they were told by god, "i created you" and this serves the purpose of taking them as hosts later- and to deny "brought from another planet" because then they would be slaves who deserve freedom-
anyway, this episode assists me to challenge our society-
in that realm people are moved planet to planet and it is easy to question the faith in creation-
we see those who insist INSIST that god said they were created by hin on that planet to serve that god- exactly what jews and christians and muslims are told in our reality

are we like those who believe in a book that said "god created us on this planet" the same as those people?

admittedly the alternative that we were brought to earth by other life forms is "far" from our experience- and is as bad as "seeded" which is not plausible-
but the alternative should not be "influenced" by a book that says to pain children !
we should not be dui- under the influence of a harmful cruel evil book- which demonstrates by its contecnts about its cruel evil writers-

the bottom line and conclusion- should we be believing, we who exist in our "non-fiction" reality- what those aliens believe- that god created us on this planet? hmm...
for more information on protecting children please see
http://www.gundersenhealth.org/ncptc/center-for-effective-discipline
there are other options besides immoral pain of hits-
and
http://tomsawyerssongs.blogspot.co.il/2015/08/fun-summer-vacation-song.html

it rips my heart that not only immoral pain of circumcision- itself is a problem but circumcision decisions of parents set "the tone" for parents to grant permission to hit their children.

ploughshares fund

I like the idea that ploughshare fund set a goal to limit nuclear weapons- specifically for Iran where organized demonstrators call other countries satan and devil.

I am sad that they write it as if all countries should disarm- 

this is complicated so i will use analaogy-

because if the "enslavers" [in quotes and defined below] desire nukes then the "freedom of the citizen" countries need it as a deterrent-

kind of like the idea in fictional stargate series where the "super technology" which could be used to fight the "enslavers" and not only weapon-

but specifically to free- FREE 

tokra can [with tolin season three pretense] remove a gouaould enslaver while preserving the host lives- in contrast to humans- who lack the technology to free the host from slavery [remember season one kowalski?]- and it is frustrating that such technology is not used to free the slaves... 

**my point is if personal freedom is important and valued, then it is frustrating that such technology is not used to free the enslaved hosts-

similarly when the leaders of islam quote the will of allah to change other people and decide for them that is a degree of slavery- and we see the actions using even violence against the "satan" who allows muslims to choose- at all- such as america and other democracies- because some choose to sin against islam- hence the name "satan"

and having powerful weapons assists that- in contrast to freedom of the citizen- a western value.

the public has a right to know (as published dr gabriela barzin 17 august page 28 in israel hayom) ploughshares has representatives for removing sanctions on iran- 

admittedly they claim "we are anti-nuke and the agreement limits iran nuclear" yet sanctions also limit-

sanctions also limit if that is a goal the continue sanctions and make them harsher- yet more relevant than sanctions is the issue that this specific agreement has problems-

for example the iranian military bases are denied inspection and other numerous "concessions" and issues- which top officials are revealing to the public

the claim "this agreement limits irans nuclear therefore anti-nuke should support" is debatable because there are holes in the agreement as many congress-members are pointing out-

and the "watchdog of democracy" called news media reported that john kerry complained- the details are "classified" ! why the need to make treaty-details classified? demonstrating a need to hide from the congresspeople what they will vote about -- can that be ?  jesus christ !

and if ploughshare fund would be- as they say "to secure a more peaceful world, including one free of nuclear weapons" as an important issue-

http://www.ploughshares.org/about-us

as mentioned i challenge the wording there-

yet even in their own goal i expect them to be more careful about removing iranian sanctions and about funding j-street which also pushes for removing iranian sanctions-

because we must learn from past experience from the actions of iran-representatives until now- we must look at the actions of the iranian representatives- connections with hezbolla and other issues and comprehend how they have used violence until now. I will contact them.

rock or paper

After a swim in my private pool, I went to nathans house for the afternoon. we ate bread spread with peanut butter and white sweet marshmallow fluff- and next we would play a lottery game. who would begin the game? me or him? 

nathan said that I should begin because I was the guest, and I was happy to start, yet he was the host- so I declined and said "no, lets do rock paper- you know? show a fist like a rock or a flat palm like a paper".

nathan asked, "rock wins because it is harder?"

"no, the rules of the game are paper covers rock"

"fine", he agreed and put out "paper"

"wait! we count and then show" I exclaimed and turned to see his big sister who asked, "what are you playing?"

"we are playing rock paper scissor" I answered.

"one two three and..." sally counted- 

nathan showed a paper but sally and I showed rock- nathan won

nathan asked, "why did you show a rock? you said paper covers rock!"

i explained that i feared he would show scissor and cut my paper- so I put a rock to break the scissors.

nathan asked, "what if we each put out a different one?"

I replied, "my rock would break sally's scissors and your paper would cover my rock so you would win"

sally argued "my scissors would cut your paper after covering tom's rock"

"no!" I insisted, "because my rock would break the scissors"

nathan suggested by order of the alphabet- n is first, then s for sally and finally t.

we played the lottery game and had a fun afternoon.

note:

rock loses to paper which loses to scissors leaving scissors?

or rock breaks scissors after cutting paper leaving rock? or before cutting paper leaving paper cover rock... hmmm...

this is why a trial has the name tri+al with tri in it for three for balance.

swiss versus saudis

an israeli newspaper said that israel is the only government which opposed removal of sanctions for iran-

not only quoting obama claiming this, but "reporting"-

yet as late as july 2015 saudis also oppose-

with obama pushing for the deal [apparently desperate to get the shia iran to fight sunni IS islamic state organization as the UN prefers] saudi government officials are silenced- but here is how they feel

"However, Saudi officials have privately expressed their disappointment at the deal, with one, speaking on condition of anonymity, telling Reuters: "We have learned as Iran's neighbors in the last 40 years that goodwill only led us to harvest sour grapes."---  and the monarchy [king] "surprisingly" does not represent the people

http://europe.newsweek.com/saudi-arabian-society-unites-attack-iran-deal-330345

saudis oppose the deal. now we can reword that "report"-

the "only free country to oppose the iran deal is israel" but the suadis who are not free but kinged also oppose the removal of sanctions- saudi government is a king- we remember how kings were...

a daily [newspaper] "Saudi daily that reflects government views"- opposes the removal of sanctions from iran

so israel is not the only government opposing because members of the saudi government- who must submit to the king- oppose the deal while being powerless same as saudi citizens- who oppose the deal but they are not "free".

http://www.economist.com/news/middle-east-and-africa/21659759-kingdom-fears-resurgent-iran-sanctions-come-proxies-and-paranoia

they feel "Iranian regime is like a monster that was tied to a tree and has finally been set loose,”

I -same as the saudis- am sad that iran set loose and I claim it is to get the iranians to send their soldiers into danger fighting IS and this is not justified

it is not only israel who oppose- 

is israel claiming: the whole world is "wrong" except israel? as some critics say?

the "powers" want iran to send troops- that is the reason for sanction-removal not because they are "correct" and no-

israel government is not alone in this opinion- saudis also oppose "freeing" iran from the bonds of sanctions

which brings us to swiss-

the switzerland government is removing sanctions from iran

in this they prefer iran-

over the saudis

??

fun summer vacation- song

fun summer vacation song

ts

:

Yay! no school lunch! I eat healthy

long squared strips of fried potato

this balanced diet is complete

ketchup represents tomato

with time to watch a video

I'll enjoy the four- fantastic

with Su, Ben and the human torch

and flexible Reed- elastic

watch a Jewish-mom slap her boy

prescribed in jewish tradition 

punish and educate with hits 

part of the jewish mom's mission

a jewish identity trait

also the silver menora

and in the video we see

the third- on the door mezuza

     *background: jewish mishna REQUIRES parents and teachers to hit their children and in a society when everyone does that- it seems okay- luckily in our culture the punishment of animals is not the same as the punishment of kids- unless your religion instructs you to hit the kids. 

in this video "fantastic 4"- 2015 the trait of slapping a son is a jewish trait the same as the silver menora [eight branched lamp] centered on the shelf and the wooden mezuza case on the door-

some jews prefer morality to tradition- and do not circumcise nor hit their children- I wish there would be more-

www.JewsAgainstCircumcision.org

there are plenty of other punishments- when appropriate to punish.

a real target

in israeli news the "president" of israel was interviewed if he feels threatened-

a question about "do you feel" threatened- obviously he is not a true target because his authority is almost zero and far less than any law-maker and even the lawmakers- those in the oppostion can hardly make decisions because the opposition- by definition- is not the majority group and cannot change policies and decisions-

 so they are not important enough to be worth targeting

a threat towards them is just angry words-

who is a true target-  ["who is worth targeting" sounds like i want the answerer to target someone- it is a misleading question to trap the answerer and a mean trick i heard on the radio today-

 and attempt here to reply to]

the ministers and "mankal/ceo" level of government offices- when they threatened need protection but parliament members in the opposition who cannot make changes anyway are not important whether famous herzog or less famous zuabi of the arabic political party-

who is "important enough" to be a target- the heads of government offices called minister but members at least of the opposition and the "president" with almost no powers are not real targets and threats are not "real".

this distinction is also important in understanding a mistake- in the previous post, I wrote that a minister complained that parliament "members" are not making/have not been making the same fuss and investment of time over murdered jews in contrast to the arab baby who was burned by terrorists - nor equally for jewish victims which were toddlers and babies- this complaint was directed at "members" not only at the "ministers" who head the government offices and the "president" who people criticised: why does he set aside time to give a speech about an arab baby when president's have not "honored" jewish baby-victims killed by terrorists-

will he commit the same time and effort to honor a jewish victim in the future?

the challenge above is relevant for all world leaders will they treat/respond regarding jewish victims equally to the burnt arab baby?

are you naive enough to think "yes" - ??

cecil the lion song

cecil the lion

:

A hunter paid money

so he could hunt cecil

yet worse is the stabbing

of humans by Schlissel

note: two british news agencies [dailymail and another] agreed that cecil was hunted by someone who paid for the privilege-

the only ones to blame are the ones who tricked the hunter by selling the "privilege".

worse than killing an animal is killing a person

who said? answer: law-makers reached this conclusion.

the response of the "animal lovers" to show that the hunter of cecil killed like killing  humans and the talk of killing the hunter is wrong-

because if they say "killing cecil is as bad as killing humans" then that includes "bad to kill" the hunter it would be wrong to kill the hunter and in fact worse

the value of human life must be respected and honored-

in contrast to iran "staggering execution spree" which has killed hundreds  already- just this year-

http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/iran-executes-hundreds-brutal-crane-hangings-mega-prison-outside-tehran-1508986

https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2015/07/irans-staggering-execution-spree/

in addition to previous years when they were "second" only to china- according to human rights watch= hrw
https://www.hrw.org/middle-east/n-africa/iran

yet they are "trusted" in the nuclear agreement- ??

the UN wants to remove sanctions- desperately enough that it seems to serve the purpose of iran sending its army to fight IS islamic state organization- 

yet is that correct considering the "low value" of human life showed by iran- ?

similarly schlissel claims to obey religion of killing homosexuals-

leviticus chapter 20-

shared by the "holy" bible and the the justice of islam

see the american news site 

http://www.timesofisrael.com/16-year-old-girl-stabbed-at-pride-parade-succumbs-to-wounds/

we know shlissel - what about the bottle bomb which killed an arab baby-

we DO NOT KNOW who did it-

who were the figures with covered faces?

and an israeli politician pointed out that many bottle bombs have been used against jewish homes and challenged israeli parliament members [i was mistaken to write ministers]-

"until now have you condemned the many bottle-bombs used against jewish houses?"

a challenge relevant for all world leaders-

suddenly when a jew is accused "everybody knows" that the jew is guilty. but only when the jew is "blamed"-

who makes a fuss when numerous bottle bombs were used against jewish homes- ??

besides hundreds of explosive rockets shot by arabs in gaza at jews-

??

there have been many in the past and many more claimed as "revenge" for the arab baby-

revenge against who? the people with covered faces have not yet been identified?

it is not true "revenge" because long before the arab baby died- the same arab violence existed

it is a lie to "justify" the act of evil cruel violence-

I condemn much more than the death of one baby arab- the many acts of violent "revenge" known to be done by the arabs. you should too-

I suspected

A new neighbor moved into the house across the street and their ten year old boy rode his bike.

the next day his bike was stolen. I suspected the other neighbor...

before I continue how I decided to take revenge- based on that suspicion- and that we all know- that violent revenge is evil and wicked- I want to focus on "suspicion" when I suspect someone- we know we cannot blame them-

unless someone accuses a jew-

witnesses say they saw "two people with their faces covered in black cloth" who burnt the home of an arab last week- they did not see who- they did say they saw that the faces were covered- yet everyone "suspects" that  a jew did it and blames the jews- based on suspicion- we can forget the western values mentioned above- when a jew is suspected

one "avenger" tried to kill a jew with a rifle in benjamin-zone and another arab "avenged" and tried to kill near jerusalem using a bottle-bomb- although we all agree that "violent revenge" is evil and wicked- this is even more severe when it is based only on "mere suspicion" -

WE DO NOT KNOW who did it- who burnt the arabs home- because the witnesses saw covered faces-

yet a jew can be suspected and blamed-

even when nobody saw who- 

because jews are blame-able-

when the jew is accused then "everyone does know " that the jew did it even when nobody saw who. 

now the revenge

which is more important to condemn?

the 47 violent revenges?

http://www.93fm.co.il/radio/220159/

reported at radio 93-

the bottle-bomb and the attempted rifle murder mentioned above and reported 31 july?

http://news.nana10.co.il/Article/?ArticleID=1140548

no- the focus is on blaming jews for "jewish terror" i had trouble finding news sites which reported these violent revenges-

despite knowing what occurred and even what to search for-
I had trouble finding sites which mention them-  because not worth mentioning when arabs do violence- when something more favorable can be focused on-

but we can blame a jew- "the Jew" even when nobody saw who did it.

is the bible holy

if the bible is holy, then
we should take seriously genesis 15.18 [kjv]v
In the same day the LORD made a covenant with Abram, saying, Unto thy seed have I given this land, from the river of Egypt unto the great river, the river Euphrates:
http://www.kingjamesbibleonline.org/Genesis-Chapter-15/
the other option is to say: because the bible says this- that a covenant was "made" past "i have given" to the "seed" of abraham- and that does not match your political orientation then- say it is not holy