the Israeli supreme court applied a fascinating precedent
in a case regarding "privacy" the parents claimed certain rights-
and the court ruled that "the right of the child PROTECTS from the right of the parent"
this may seem surprising yet kids NEED protection
and specifically the PREVENTION of the CRUEL PAIN of circumcision which some parents claim it is the parents' right to inflict-
yet the child's right which protects a child's privacy-
should also protect from cruel PAIN
how shocking that this application is not being used to protect babies from the CRUEL PAIN of circumcision
when a parent ignores their own child's pain??
unspeakably cruel
i have no words for such parents
i can say that according to jewish tradition a sign if someone is a jew is if they are merciful-
therefore the opposite of circumcision being a sign of a jew-
the opposite-
one who protects the child from circumcision is the merciful jew but the religious who perform this painful procedure are not the real jews
אין תגובות:
הוסף רשומת תגובה