in addition to common rhymes in which a pair of words sound the same, it is also art to use words that rhyme to the eye
expanding poetry beyond this cannot justly be called art and only in some cases can be justly considered literature. sadly our culture lowers and lowers the quality and calls art unjustly without skill nor beauty it is not art but truly "comforting a young child's failure" and not justice when they repeat it as an adult
example of an eye rhyme in couplet:
you never call
you say you shall
i hate your lie
i hope you die!
this is an eye-rhyme in couplet because your eyes see a rhyme despite the difference we say the word: shall.
in contrast the pair lie:die are both eye and common rhymes-
and easy to write and spot
the challenge is making the lines equal and using words that are not eye-rhymes for ear-rhymes
such as love:of.
someone who can say a message with these conditions can justly earn the title of art.
i mean if someone succeeds at writing words that do not say a message or do not belong together:
my house is tall
you said you shall
i color dye
soon i will die
these phrases do not belong together and only in poor quality can be called a rhyme or "art" for the eye-rhyme
worse, there is plenty
i like eating tall
fish is good shall
so we should try to encourage "art" despite raising the standard- not by enlarging art to include encompass poor quality! and not encourage unskilled in the name of art!
אין תגובות:
הוסף רשומת תגובה