global- nothing

I recently watched an episode about "worried scientists"- these scientists claim that they are "worried" about climate change.

they start by showing us tornadoes- scary! are you convinced already?

next they explain that if there is global warming there will be LESS rotation.

hmm- so less fear of swirly tornadoes - great now i am not worried. scientists who "believe" the lie of gloabal warming and thiose of you who think it is a fact should not be worried.

in fact the idea of global warming is only beneficial in that it gives rich people an excuse to use less electricity not for stinginess but to lessen 'energy use which needs production" to lessen heat...

many people are fooled that the heat of factories and cars adds enough to the heat of the sun to increase gloabl warming. assuming this is true- then less rotation and less tornadoes. more are reported than the many unreported which happened as frequently, as today, in the past.

but really there is no clear indication either way!

some days are hotter than the average of the recent decades. yet in the month of august more of the days were "less hot" than the average for example many days were the same as the average with only two days hotter than average- so less tornadoes.

more of the days ten of twenty days in august were cooler than average so the daily factories and fuel burning and trucks etc. are not adding enough heat to interfere with the slight cooling of august when it should expectedly be hot in the mediteranean area in august. check out how the temperature is "less hot" on most days:

despite the heat of the year in summer and the "added" human heat which doe snot add- most days are cooler-

in august 20 days only two were hotter-

http://www.accuweather.com/he/il/haifa/213181/august-weather/213181

than average yet eight 8 were the same as average and more than 8= ten were less hot.

so is it global warming? it is global- nothing!

an atheistic calendar

Although the average healthy-minded human does not mind-is not disturbed by the submission to the christian religion in many aspects of the calendar- with january etc. and "de facto" that is the calendar used and to avoid disputes and conflicts it is important to continue this usage for contracts, atheists deserve a parallel one for newspapers.

I recently polled atheists and over 60% were "for submitting" to the christian calendar- and that is good for contracts but we also deserve an additional one with fewer flaws.

when deciding the starting point of such a calendar- we must consider that the points in the year when the sun cycles differ from location to location. 

for example the day that is twelve hours long is called sep 25 in washington dc- NOT21 as we are taught.

in paris: sep 25 of 2016 [added day in february of this year] same as in newyork city and even london is close enough.

from sep 25 the light is less which is bad for humans who sleep at night and are active in the day. so that is not a good starting point.

how about march? 16 march in ny=w but not like london and paris!

in paris [and london too] this natural occurence is one day later than the occurenc in washington and new york- the following day called march 17.

http://www.timeanddate.com/sun/france/paris?month=3&year=2016

so using the twelve hour is a problem. unless using the spot of the UN which is NY then march 16 can be the day with 12 and the following day starts the cycle of "more light" despite the fact that before this the days had been getting longer since the shortest day but those had less light so they should not start a cycle.

the months should be numbered "first second etc." no march and mean first from the natural occurrence in the sun cycle which is not march 21 despite what we are taught but either 16 or 17 depending on location as demonstrated.

only 5 months need an extra day! 12 months of 30 days with five longer months with an extra day=31 suffice. not like the gregorian which has too many long months and when submitting to christians october seems strange as in previous post.

first from the first day of longer light is named "first or 1" and 30 days.

2,4,6,8,10 are the 5 longer months with an extra day for 31 and all the rest are 30 unless the natural occurence is a day later- in which case a day can be added to the twelfth month to start the cycle with the day with more light. 

inaccuracies in the game

when i was youger, i would play a game called "risk" a war game that depended on luck if the dice showed higher numbers you won the battle. i would roll dice which showed lower numbers and lost.

later I played a war game with the opposite rule- the odds of success were for a lower number 1 or 2 dots. i hoped based on my past experience that since my dice showed high numbers in one game they would show the same in the other game but in risk they showed low and i lost. so I swapped the dice and found that when i rolled the dice for risk the same dice which showed high now showed low and the same dice which in risk showed low- when i played the other game showed high and i lost!

the other game has many things that I feel are very inaccurate. the way i see it these inaccuracies benefit the "allies" of london-moscow-washington.

hawaii is very far from west US- yet a transport can move two moves in a turn from west coast to hawaii to wake! this is unusually far. the atlantic which is 40 degrees around needs two transport moves so i suggest a compromise- all sea zones are much bigger- halfway to the hawaii size- but not as big as the benefit of hawaii! which would allow a bomber from washington to get to hawaii in one turn of four zones. if a transport can get from west US to wake then it is very unfair that tokyo cannot send artilery to solomon islandgroup in two transport moves in one turn in fact the difference is so fast that hawaii must have an empty zone between the west US and hawaii because it is so much further! than tokyo-solomon!

similarly washington can land a transport in west africa in one move and return on the same move to make the seazones closer to the hawaii idea yet the hawaii is so far from the west coast that it is not accurate.

other changes are: japan can reach midway in one move and return the same turn.

south of tokyo is phil. and caroline:

|ma|  T.     |mi|sea      |w.U.

e.c.|ph.|  ca.| wa.|ha.|sea|neutral me.

  |bo.|N.G.|so.|sea

sea|Au.     |NZ|sea

allowing tokyo to send artilery or tanks from tokyo to new giunea or solomon in two transprt moves in the same turn- compromising with the hawii status which is so very far that a zone must be added to be accurate and not give an advantage of the bomber reaching hawaii. it can reach west africa because that is nearer!

borneo is west of philipines and philipines can go southwest to bo. or southeast to NG.

mexico and braizl were neutral until 1945 so it is inaccurate to give washington these five potential units. an advantage to the allies which is not fair because it is not accurate.

if australia is one zone- unlike risk division then 7 million square kilometers is one zone- if so undeveloped jungles and desert in africa should be the same size with 30 msk in four zones- of 7msk and not seven zones. the jungles and desert are not developed and should not give london 6 potential only the bigger zones can be worth one potential so all of africa would give london 1+1+2+2=6 for the whole africa. a tank in egypt can go one to jo-berg and return the second move in the same turn.

similarly in russia called tundra these plains are not developed and should be australia size controlling the east coast controls a zone of 7msk so if we accept the conversion of one a+1a and 1 t that is two artillery and one tank in the same zone like australia. south russia would include the other 7 msk leaving 3 msk for the moscow and causus and leningrad zones. total zones 5 with potential 3+3+8+2+2=18 giving moscow more potential for plains in tundra is inaccurate and gives allies more power- a bias to assist the allies which is not real. it is worth two because it includes the bigger size. so the game gives much more potential to the allies when converting the situation at that time is unrealistically helping the allies. similarly granting london potential for jungles and desert in africa is inaccurate giving the allies production which is not fair nor acuurate. in contrast to europe which is developed. these are my complaints about the game- the allies would still win but less inaccurate.

october=octagon

why is september the ninth month?

if we call october like octagon then 8 and sept should be seven yet we call october "ten"??

we are born into a world with a  calendar which calls 1 to january. however, the names preserve a different calendar. ten conflicts the name for october and december. december is now the last moth of the year- but not when it was named.

the twelfth month of the year was named february and the added day 2/29 was added before the new year started in march [not somewhere in the middle of the year]. such as in 2016 day added before the new year began- this matches josephus that "the year begins" in spring- not only the jewish year as in exodus demonstrating the pharisees believed in the bible and not in the mishna which they claim existed orally yet deny- "years are counted from fall" in mishna but pharisees rejected that oral tradition until later jews abandoned tradition and made fall the new year for years but also the calendar started in spring as preserved in the name october: 

march was the first month- so ap=2, ma=3, ju=4, ju=5, aug=6, se=7, oc=8 like octagon, no=9, dec=10 like decimal is a ten-based system and two more months until the twelfth month february that is how the months were named. 

later jesus followers kept the names but changed the starting point to jesus birth in the end of december and then it stopped being the tenth month- yet the name was the same this causes a conflict! dec is for ten like decimal!

now it seems odd to add a day in the second month but that is because the christians changed the start point to jesus-day in december to start the year. the tenth month became the twelfth but the name was not changed. originaly october was the eighth month like octogan before jesus followers changed and the day was added to leap years the day before the new year began before march first. the calandar is called julian because of julius ceasar- so those who say julius added a month for july is a problem because he founded the calendar- and a twelve month calendar is easy to divide into quarters and thirds in contrats to a ten or eleven month calendaar a compromise is that augustus "changed-name" of one month to his own name or not.

time - correction

I must try to correct a conflict regarding the issue of time

\

"Because an observer on the ground sees the satellites in motion relative to them, Special Relativity predicts that we should see their clocks ticking more slowly (see the Special Relativity lecture). Special Relativity predicts that the on-board atomic clocks on the satellites should fall behind clocks on the ground by about 7 microseconds per day because of the slower ticking rate due to the time dilation effect of their relative motion." source:  http://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/~pogge/Ast162/Unit5/gps.html

conflict: in my previous post a quoted the idea [link below] which i saw in sci-fi and was supported by a link- which i quoted: that less gravity means faster time passage. 

two days later i saw an episode of national geographic showing that atomic clocks in orbit are slower! the opposite of less gravity time faster than the surface the clock is slower- less gravity seems to slow time! and i search and see ohiio state said the same! quioted above "clocks on the satellites should fall behind clocks on the ground" yet if surface gravity is greater than the clock on the ground should fall behind. in an episode of hawkings he said on the mountain the clock is faster so going down the mountain is going to the past or future?

if surface gravity is greater them mountain and the clock on the satellite fall behind the clock on earth then less gravity force means slower time or else the clock on the surface would show an earlier time than the clock above!

if so the moment before matter began in the "big bang" there would have been zero gravity and infinitely less gravity is like the clock on the satellite- falling behind infinitely slower and no time would pass.

for the opposing view

http://tomsawyerssongs.blogspot.co.il/2016/08/can-time-be-measured.html

what is true??

see also:

http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/news/science/wonderquest/2003-04-03-space-clock.htm

steaks and shakes!

steaks with shakes

ts

:

I enjoy a meal

of yummy beef steak

coolled-off  we will feel

we'll drink a milk-shake!

note: during the hot summer, a cold chocolate milk shake feels good! and other flavors too! enjoy one with your beef steak! 

can time be measured?

can time be measured?

we do measure time and call the increments by names such as minutes hours etc. yes time can be measured.

this fact does not bother people who try to write "cool sounding ideas" such as "the elements of space and time canot be measured". how poetic and misleading. the passage of time between events is measurable because time is measurable. quantity.

when was the beginning of time?

this question is stupid because first we must ask "wes there a beginning".

only religious who claim god created time can claim that before the creation of time there was no time or as one website said "there was  no before' prior to" the creation of time.

if one hour ago i startr=ed to count one hour then by now one hour passed.

if infinite a started to count then infinite hours passed.

simple logic.

adding math-words to the sentence is not any better- consider shooting light at a mirror- if the source moves then the light will not 'return straight back' but will pass where the source was. if it is shot at an angle then the light could pass the new place of the train but then the distance is measurable and in fact "the same as what the observer outside the train sees as well as the one inside" who has moved to the new place.

yet somehow that does not bother Tianlu who wrote : "Imagine now, that we're in a train moving at constant velocity $v$ and we point a beam of light upwards towards a mirror that then reflects the beam directly back down.  In our frame (train frame) the light will have traveled a distance of $d=2h$ in a time $t=d/c$.  BUT an observer outside the train would see that the light has traveled greater than $2h$because the train will have moved as well." at quora site.

adding math-words to the sentence is not any better, as we can see. if the mirror is in the train then the distance is so small [to the roof of the train] that that the light jumped from the source and back before the train moved because TRAINS TRAVEL SLOWER THAN LIGHT. if the mirror is high above the train then the light would miss because time passed and the light moved through space.

in sci-fi time is shown as slower near a black hole. the observer from a distace sees the people nearer to the black hole as moving slower than themselves.

the theory is that time raltes to the mass of the matter. if the mass is great then time is slow whereas in weaker gravity time is faster.
to demonstarte: in weaker gravity if i go sixty miles per hour  the hour passed faster- relative to the hour in stronger gravity. in both places we traveled sixty miles because an hour passed but the hour was longer in the more intense gravity.

assuming this is true when two people decide to sleep separately for eight hours and one is on a mountain, then the eight hours- although being 8 is "less than" the eight hours on the surface. if there would be no matter then there would be zero mass and time would not pass because it would be infintely less gravity and time "would pass" infinitely faster! which is just silly words.

if we imagine the moment of the big bang- all the mass would be "together" much greater gravity force than any of the separate black holes matter because the total of those matters and more were at the point of the big bang grapefruit or whatever. if so time would be infinitely slow and there would be no after for the matter to "bang" out over time. 

andrew explains at stackexchange "your clock would stop" near a black hole- and if so- certainly more at the greater mass at the mass before the big bang.

compare http://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/25759/how-exactly-does-time-slow-down-near-a-black-hole

so people who believe in science would have the problem of "no after" if the mass were truly in one spot before the big bang. time would be infinitely slow- which they deny because there was an after. yet if physics are true then there is no after and at the same time religionists say there is "no before". i think we must combine both views into one fact: there is no before and there is also no after!

religion causes more suffering

in the heat of the summer we are warned that it is even more IMPORTANT than usual to drink more water every day! 

we need the water to sweat in the hot summer besides the normal usual need. however some isolated religious people do not know about "water needs" and are not aware of dietitians recommendations. they only measure importance if you DIE- then it is important.

the issue is not if you will die- but is the action correct. 

if I do not pay my mortgage for many months- "you won't die" from that! does that mean it is relatively unimportant? this is not an accurate way to measure importance! the correct action is to pay the loan! what is the correct action.

the problem is when these isolated religious people are taught to deny themselves water on a hot day. i do not mean the burden on ambulances- they wont die from a day without water! so who cares? the issue is not will they die. that is not the issue but what does a body need in the summer. well if you will not die you do not desperately need it!

anyway- with this excuse they teach the isolated students that two of the hottest days in the summer when we educated people know that there is GREAT IMPORTANCE to drink plenty of water on a hot summer day- because we do not measure "based only on what kills you" but what does a human body need daily- 

they must deny themselves water. despite the fact that these are summer days when we need the water to sweat and other needs, religion insists that summer--

SUMMER when it is very hot- is the time to deny yourself even water and no water at all- for the whole day! the isolated students are taught not even brush the teeth because that would RISK the sin of swallowing a drop of water on a day when it is bad to drink according to the jewish religion. 

these misguided young students are isolated and taught to deny the most basic need- we know it is a need- despite the trick above- to deny water! on two of the hottest summer days each year!

in fact these are the longest days- in the northern hemisphere- so the water is forbidden for around fourteen hours and perhaps even earlier in the morning too!

to comprehend just how long the day is in the summer in jerusalem- more than 14 hours! the latest sunsets of the year. and this especially long time is the time chosen by religious leaders to "fast" with no food nor water- for the longest time possible all year. it is so hot people barely have an appetite! and that is the heat which necessitates DRINKING WATER!! in jerusalem today the temperature is 96 ninety-six degrees fahrenheit! measured locally as 36 centigrade. we know how hot this feels!

in this intense heat the isolated students have no one to explain to them that the body needs water daily and even more so when the day is the hottest of the summer days!

they are isolated by the rabbis and encouraged to stay isolated- this gaurantees they will never know that it is important to drink water every day.

the rabbis respond "big deal you did not die."

but this is wrong and misleading.

at least in the southern hemisphere things are the reverse! these two "fast" days with no water are the short days! in australia the shortest days are in june- less than ten hours in the summer. colder days 16 degrees centigrade- much cooler than the jerusalem 36 c mentioned!

to ensure that jews in australia also suffer- the rabbis have a winter fast day when the day in jerusalem is short- and the opposite in the southern hemisphere! they will suffer in the december HEAT for the many hours of the longest days! 

***and we thought being a chosen people was something "better"- jews are losers! they deny themselves even water, on the hottest days, for the longest days in both hemispheres, of the planet!

instead drink water every day!

we can clearly see the cruelty of the rabbis- no surprise then that they also - consistent with cruelly increasing suffering- also encourage circumcision without any medical need...

UFO over Jerusalem (twenty years)

many people feel that Jerusalem is a "magical" city. although many have reported unidentified spaceships over many cities, one over jerusalem is an even more sensational story.

here we are in the summer, twenty summers after an apparently alien spaceship shot across the jerusalem sky. I am skeptical but regardless: here is the story of the eye-witness named naptali:

naptali was named for a biblical character naptali. he had suffered another hot summer day, and now that the sun had set he decided to go out for a walk in the elevated city of jerusalem in the hope of cooling off.

"I walked in the hot night. when I heard a whoosh from above, I instinctively turned to look at the noise- yet the sky was empty. no wing-lights! the sound was like the sound of a jet-plane racing overhead. when you hear a jet- the sound gets to the ear long after the jet has moved away from the place it made the sound. 

I remembered, years before I had heard the same jet whoosh and looked up at what seemed to be the source of the sound and that part of the sky was empty. a few "degrees" to the side, of that place, a small whitish "minus-sign" moved silently and slowly -as it appeared. it was probably flying 500 miles per hour or more! yet appeared slowly [objects far away move a "long distance" which seems smaller] moving across the sky. silently. 

sound came from a different part of the sky- the whoosh of the jet reaching his ears long after the plane was not there anymore and had moved away.

based on this experience I now searched the sky for the lights of a jet around the area, but saw no wing-lights. only a few scattered stars. suddenly one star- which had seemed like every other star without movement- moved! it moved quickly across the sky! if it was a human jet it would need to move constantly and not seem like a star! now it moved much faster than the jet I had watched as a child!"

he waited for the whoosh- for the sound-waves to reach his ears from the great height of the sky! and waited and waited! it must be extremely high! for the sound took so very long to come down to his ears. if the height is so much, then the jet should have appeared even slower! more than a minute passed and no sound! human technology at high speed makes a sound- the whoosh we hear from jets and at even faster speeds- as this plane moved quickly! the boom is even louder we know it is a sonic boom!

to go that fast silently must be alien technology! because humans cannot do it."

naptali asked others if they saw a star move and no-one believed him. 

say "I am skeptical" even naptali also says so! but inside- he believes!

3600 reads! the readers get the credit!

over 3600 reads! the readers get the credit! t