clarification

in my previous post I described obama "shooting wildly in all directions"

http://tomsawyerssongs.blogspot.co.il/2017/01/obama-against-israel.html

 insulting russia with ambassador story and not helping the middle-eastern-ally Israel in the UN. it is easy to convince one person to be anti-israel especially if obama studied under muslim education as a child but to get a majority in congress to oppose obama shows that these congressman understand diplomacy and alliances. BRITIAN criticised the obama administration for being too harsh with israel. now I clarify what I refferred to in britian relations.

instead of apologizing, in response to british criticsm, obama shot back at the british, criticising their criticsm- as published NINE DAYS AGO not as I wrote "weeks ago" I refferred to the criticism and claimed obama was ending his diplomacy, now that he NO LONGER NEEDS the cooperation for his personal agenda so he can insult all over.

I concluded that this demonstrates that obama was what the racists suspected. there is some doubt which of obama's race and religion can be trusted and which cannot be trusted because their loyalty is first to something else but there is NO DOUBT and with certainty that the total of convicted criminals of all races plus "committed crimes not yet caught" would be much-much lower if those in obama's race were busy in the cotton fields. whether president or judges who might be "loyal first to their own race before justice" hence if all of that race would still be slaves, in the past, then with certainty the number of committed crimes as well as convicted criminals would be much much less.

could the first step to making a significant reduction in crime be slavery? I will need to study the statistics and demographics.

this site should show the demographics but hides them
https://www.bjs.gov/index.cfm?ty=tp&tid=942

oh well.