colder than last year

many people believe that "global warming is a fact"

FACT

after all: just think of all the hot engines producing heat throughout the year

despite our contribution of heat to our environment we can compare the 'actual temperature'. I chose the shorter days after the equinox to compare -less sun, to see what we cause when there is less sun in autumn= the beginning of october

if we compare one day- the 11 day from the official equinox last year 2014 october 1 was 64F=18C the same as this year- despite the innumarably large number of hot engines- daily for an entire year we have not heated the environment the number in centigrade is the same however centigrade is not good for human temperatures because one degree change of centigrade is very "coarse" in contrast to the smaller increments of fahrenheit used in new york. [increment is not the opposite of excrement]

in new york 2014 october 1 was 65 degrees farenhiet feels cold- for humans yet a year later-

after an additional year of millions of hot engines-

daily for hundreds of days-

the temperature was COLDER only 64F.

on the same date relative to the equinox.

but lets us see a five day trend with fluctuations 

ONLY one  day was hotter in the five day stretch, the majority 80% were "not hotter" despite the contribution of millions of hot engines for hundreds of days.

in fact the average in 2014 for the first five days of october  was 98@19C

in contrast to this year 2015- that all five days were COLDER than the historical average [20C because less than 20C] and the average was only 81@16C a cooling of 3 degrees centigrade.

significantly colder 3 degrees centigrade=celsius-

which is much more than three degrees in the fahrenheit. 

so when you read that "some days were hotter this year than last"-

it is not "consistently hotter" but-

RANDOM- random and in fact this year significantly colder-

so drive your jeap more often so we can slow the global cooling-

tell people that this year a series of days was COLDER than last year by more than 5 degrees fahrenheit.

current events

another meat warning

the vegetarians say "we told you so" you will get cancer from eating meat

it depends how much

300 grams per week is recommended-

quote "Cancer Council recommends eating only moderate amounts of fresh red meat. A moderate intake of meat is 65-100g of cooked red meat, 3-4 times a week. This is also the recommendation in the Dietary Guidelines for Australians.

Read more at http://www.cancercouncil.com.au/21639/cancer-information/cancer-risk-and-prevention/healthy-weight-diet-and-exercise/meat-and-cancer/#jtBQWmxxxu1eY66v.99"

that means that EVEN IF you would not vary your diet--90*3-4=270-360 hence-

i could still eat up to 9 mcdonald beef patties [or 4 bigmacs because each has 2+a ninth patty] spread throughout the week! because: "Hi, thanks for your question. The cooked beef patties in our Big Mac weigh approximately 66g, and in our Hamburgers and Cheeseburgers the cooked patties weigh approximately 33g."

http://www.mcdonalds.co.uk/ukhome/whatmakesmcdonalds/questions/food/portion-sizes/how-much-does-your-beef-burger-weigh-in-grams.html

33*9=297 grams.
in australia the patties seem bigger at 44 grams and 9*44 is still less than 100 4 times a week
!!
only the "quarter poundr" has 113 grams in the patty
https://yourquestions.mcdonalds.com.au/questions/13686
so i do not believe the websites that say bigger 1.8 ounce=51 gram but 1.6 is near.
sadly Mcdonalds NEEDS to reply to accusations WHICH THEY DO
http://www.mcdonalds.com/us/en/your_questions/our_food/burgers-and-sandwiches.html

TOPIC: The "carcinogous" meat 
is also "out of proportion" because as w.h.o. admitted "These numbers contrast with:
about 1 million cancer deaths per year globally due to tobacco smoking,
600 000 per year due to alcohol consumption,
and more than 200 000 per year due to air pollution
while "only 34,000" are caused: "about 34 000 cancer deaths per year worldwide are attributable to diets high in processed meat." which is different from "red meat"- "Examples of processed meat include hot dogs (frankfurters), ham, sausages, corned beef, and biltong/beef jerky as well as canned meat and meat-based preparations and sauces" because of salting or fermentation which ALSO depend on amount consumed weekly-
but regardless-

"red meat is different"and as mentioned 300 grams per week of beef is good and recommended and even better: to vary with different types of beef/pork etc.

3 people bought a pizza together?

today i met with two friends and i suggested we buy a pizza together.

so we divided the price and when the pizza was served we each ate two slices.

this is not a "word problem" for math practice theory but a true event which occirred. the pie cost 9 dollar so we each pay 3.

now here is the "problem" we are buddies and want to be "fair" but a pizza has 8 slices that is the familiar pizza so how do you divide it?

first write the problem:

2 pieces/slices divided for 3 people--> i type on the computer: 2/3 wait that is also the answer! 

2/3 is also the solution. it does mean 2 divided by three but the same 2/3 also means two thirds in which each friend gets 2/3 instead of one getting "less" than the others.

so we cut it and each one got part.

theory

how would we write 2 "six-packs" of cola and two more cans?

2*6+2 meaning two "groups of" six and two more. we know this must be 14 therefore even when we read 2+2*6 the meaning is 2 and 2 groups of six must be 14 so we first multiply and then add.

if we would do the order of reading: 2 cans and two groups of six=24 that would be false.

we can only add first when we use the factors 2+2*(2+3)=2+2*6

revenge?

as mentioned the religion of islam emphasized forgiveness 

yet somehow actions are different

i searched for the word revenge see post "no luck" and could not find the word revenge with google searches nor yahoo searches except when accusing a jew of revenge

today the search shpowed examples of revenge- instead of the important forgiveness taught by islam

forgive a kufaar as mentioned

23 august

http://www.jpost.com/Arab-Israeli-Conflict/Palestinian-youths-seeking-revenge-for-Duma-attack-charged-with-Jerusalem-firebombings-412985

when they should obey the muslim faith and forgive

and in july

http://www.euronews.com/2015/07/31/revenge-calls-as-palestinian-boy-dies-in-jewish-settler-arson-attack/

that does not work- the obligation of islam to forgive is ignored by the muslim.

prefer teaching of altaqum revenge

 so we should teach them the teaching of jet li

"do not revenge because it increases bloodshed" 

in fearless

when a court punishes a home-owner they call that revenge when it is part of the puinishment of the homeowner andnot a "group" punishment but the owner is unished

https://electronicintifada.net/blogs/charlotte-silver/israels-high-court-champions-revenge-against-palestinian-families

they have an electronic intifada as well.

rely on the british- to hide the jewish victims of stabbings

"Fresh violence between Palestinians and Israelis has seen six Palestinians shot dead in Gaza, reports say, and a fresh spate of stabbings."

site: http://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-34484765

no mention of those "guilty of attempted murder" a severe crime.

when religion alters other fields

i heard 3 narratives about the israelite exodus

5776-2016= 3760-2448= 1312 bc meaning: according to the religious jews, this year called 2016 is called 5776 and also the academic year of the "hebrew calendar@ in submission to the religious minority.

this is an example when religion attempts to influence history.

therefore: subtracting the years from bc, reveals the difference, that the year called 3760 is year one ad and the same idea: that the year one of religious jews is called -3760.

according to religious jews and rashi commentary to talmud aboda zara 2448 was the exit of israelites called exodus= 3760-2448=1312, hence 1312 bc and 40 years later 1270 entered israel- the problem is that at that time egypt empire ruled the area of the jordan river and 'crossing the jordan river' would be a return to egypt at that time.

'During the long reign of Ramses II (1279–1213 bc), there was...the battle of Kadesh, fought in his fifth regnal year [-1274]. These and extensive accompanying texts present the battle as an Egyptian victory, but in fact the opposing Hittite coalition fared at least as well as the Egyptians. ...In succeeding years Ramses II campaigned in Syria; after a decade of stalemate, a treaty in his 21st year=-1260 so we see at the time that religious jews claim -1270, that the israelites crossed the jordan river, from east to west, they would have been entering the egyptian empire at the time that ramses 2 battled in syria.

see map of tutmosis

http://www.britannica.com/biography/Thutmose-III

'Thutmose III,  (died 1426 bce), king (reigned 1479–26 bce) of the 18th dynasty, often regarded as the greatest of the rulers of ancient Egypt. Thutmose III was a skilled warrior who brought the Egyptian empire to the zenith of its power by conquering all of Syria, 

to say the exodus happened 'before' 1312 is still a problem because of tutmosis.

a second narrative is not the religious jews but of josephus.

counting from -164 antiocus

count back 612,466,70,414 as detailed in book 20 of josephus

-578 cyrus allows self-rule

-648 temple destroyed by babylon according to josephus

-1114 solomon built temple j

-1726 exodus and crossing jordan -1680 yet we know that 'the 12th dynasty (1991–1786)- During these two centuries [1990-1790 bc] Egyptian control was established over Nubia, Libya, Palestine, and southern Syria' also in encyclopedia americana 12 dynasty. this was held until the 13 dynasty

'THE 13TH DYNASTY (C. 1756–C. 1630 BC)

Despite...the royal residence remained at Itjet-towy and the kings ruled the whole country. Egypt’s hold on Lower Nubia was maintained, as was its position as the leading state in the Middle East'

so we can be confident that josephus was "off" by a few years.

the third narrative already posted here is the one taught for high-school history claiming abraham 1800 bc and an exodus in 1660 bc with the same issue of the 13 dynasty and crossing the jordan in -1620 is entering egypt empire.

claiming an earlier exodus before the egyptian empire spread is still in conflict with sesostris='Sesostris I (or Senwosret, reigned 1908–1875 bc) An inscription of the next reign alludes to campaigns to Syria-Palestine in the time of Sesostris 1 also 3, 'most enduring reputation was Sesostris III (1836–18 bc), who extended Egyptian conquests to Semna, at the south end of the Second Cataract, while also mounting at least one campaign to Palestine=canaan. egyptian administrative seals of that period 1850 bc were found in digs in palestine.

the only way for josephus to fit what we know about egyptian empires is 1876 bc because-

'Little is known of the reigns of Amenemhet II (1876–42 bc) and Sesostris II (1844–37 bc) +the reign of Amenemhet III (1818–1770 bc). The king of the 12th dynasty with the most enduring reputation was Sesostris III (1836–18 bc), who extended Egyptian conquests to Semna, at the south end of the Second Cataract, while also mounting at least one campaign to Palestine'

this can be explained by the turmoil of the ten plagues in the book of exodus or if that is a legend which never occurred as an exodus and entering cannan when egypt was weak, then later as mentioned egypt ruled tthe israelites in israel -1818 until solomon in 1114 bc.

thus the phase of egypt ruling the area of the jordan river would be after the exodus in 1870 bc with josephus off by 150 years andthen being ruled by egypt after crossing the jordan river as described in 

britannioca 'around 1505 bc 'Before the close of the 16th century bc, [1590-1501 bc] the native 18th dynasty rose in Egypt; it expelled the Hyksos and founded the New Kingdom. The New Kingdom rulers moved back into Syria-Palestine'

in summary each of the 3 narratives does not match what we know about ancient egypt.

the turmoil of an exodus and weak kingdoms coincides with 1870 bc amenemhet and if josephus was correct it was not 612 years but 1870-1820 bc is 700 years before solomons temple.

should we claim david never existed?

according to britanica 'Transjordan and western Palestine, the Hebrews founded a tribal confederation that was changed into a monarchy by Saul and David (c. 1020–960 bc).' this also solves the problem of crossing the jordan into egypt- because it was after egypt empire receded. if so the israelites did not exit egypt empire to move from place to place but stayed in one pplace and the egyptian empire failed in that region and that was the exit from egyptian control when egyptian control failed.

a second example of religion altering science is when those who insist that the world is YOUNG make claims about evolution.

i read today that "dna did not change for millions of years" and therefore "refutes the claim that man evolved from ape" in other words the dna did not change so man must be created by god not born from a common ancester with mutation because dna did not change for millions of years

they should limit themselves to religion.

first mammals changed from 120 million until sixty million as we see in fossils so apparently dna did change or dna did not change but something else did.

also the focus should not be on dna but on chromosomes !!

most apes have 24 pairs of chromosomes. humans have 23 pairs that is the change not dna so focussing on dna not change is stupid because thehuman change is a change in chromosomes

pbs explains most clearly that the "tail ends" are also in the middle of a certain chromosome and when this mutation was born "whereas a normal chromosome has readily identifiable, repeating DNA sequences called telomeres at both ends, chromosome 2 also has telomere sequences not only at both ends but also in the middle. " this convinces me that one of the 24 pairs fused with a second and that mutation was the first humans who mated with each other identifiable as today by the number of chromosomes. for more details 

http://biology.stackexchange.com/questions/3393/evolutionarily-speaking-why-do-humans-have-46-chromosomes

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oCLiiH7ObsE

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/evolution/library/07/3/l_073_47.html

I am most convinced by the last 3 lines of pbs.

jewish settlements

did you know that a legal document "encourages" settlement by jews
??
article 6
http://avalon.law.yale.edu/20th_century/palmanda.asp#art6
see for yourself

self contradiction

if something self-contradicts- then we know it is not reliable

the "great" book of the universe and noble and miraculous teaches

"40. The recompense of an evil deed can only be an evil equal to it;"

noble quran 42.40 with a commentary "retaliation"

http://mquran.org/content/view/4312/4/

we must be AWARE what the muslims read in their book "how to live".

since the book also says to forgive, someone should teach the rock throwers in the middle-east who demand "end the occupation" about israeli occupation, to "forgive"

somehow us "deniers" of muhamed, hear about the islamic requirement to forgive- while in actions the muslims in the middle east prefer verse 40 above. and what is considered "equal" retaliation?

clearly no muslim teacher tells them to "forgive" the israeli occupation, despite the quotes to "forgive" at the site

http://islamqa.info/en/8894

that is only to mislead us- the deniers- so we will not be prepared...

no luck

hapless

ts

:

I was relaxing on some hay

ma said "hey, pick the haws I hae"

even meaner is my harsh pa

when I complained he just said "ha!"

"do it! hie! when i was your age

i sawed and made a wooden h

i said "hah! you know about wood?"

wood is more fun i wish i could.

*meaning

hey> I want you to listen

haw>the berry of the hawthorn

hae>hold in possession

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/hae

ha=hah>I am surprised

hie>to hurry

**

for more h words

http://israblog.nana10.co.il/blogread.asp?blog=748803&blogcode=13870584

**

current events

I find it shocking- that at a time [october 18] when "hamas wants revenge" with the word revenge

site:   http://www.israelhayom.com/site/newsletter_article.php?id=28995

this is the only website that mentions it. 

yahoo news only used the word "revenge" about jews, but not for muslim terrorists showing a double-standard for making the jew look bad. 

the horrid jew does bad revenge but not the holy muslims.

muslims are "fresh" and good but the jew does bad revenge 

"fresh wave of stabbings also hit Israel and the West Bank, including a revenge attack by a Jewish suspect"

site:   AFP via Yahoo! NewsOct 09 03:55 PM

 they only use the word for a jew but not for a muslim- the muslims "defend" a mosque-

by killing a jew far away from the mosque, who is no threat. 

that is not bad revenge, only jews do bad revenge.

several searches "revenge" showed numerous websites who refuse to say the terrorists want revenge- the websites refused to use the word revenge unless they are accusing a jew of revenge.

if not for this site i would not find the word, it is concealed even about hamas. 

noone wants the arabs to look "bad" the word revenge can only be used when reporting about jews- 

the fact is: terrorists often explain violence to hurt jews as "revenge" for something the jews did.

they say it so often that we understand that the quran does not really obligate them to forgive- despite the quotes they tell us deniers- to make us unprepared.

we see the incitement and actions of "not obeying the quran to forgive"

someone should teach the muslims- what jet li taught

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0446059/

in the biography of Chinese Martial Arts Master Huo Yuanjia "do not do revenge because revenge adds more bloodshed"

revenge is wicked and bad and evil

when a terrorist said "I killed a jew in revenge" that shows the wickedness not only of the specific terrorist-

but also of the muslim faith which, despite its book, islamic teachers have taught the act of revenge.

osiris returns

alternate ending to stargate sg-1 "the curse"

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0709183/

http://www.gateworld.net/sg1/s4/413.shtml

after daniel pushes a dart with tranquilizer into the "female host" of osiris ""Daniel resists,and plunges a tranquilizer dart into the Goa'uld's side. Osiris reels back, and moves toward a console. He activates a Goa'uld ship buried in the sands near the temple and,promising to return one day and to make the rivers of Earth "run red with blood," Osiris uses transport rings to escape to the ship and flee. "

after daniel pushes a dart with tranquilizer fluid into the "female host" of osiris, she uses the artifact to open the rocks and run through the opening. daniel crawled after her but the old stones, on a sliding steel door, slam shut behind her. inside the cavern the goa'uld osiris is falling asleep- tranquilized by the chemical and struggles to control the host- her eyes flash yellow light which fades. she presses the artifact again on the panel of a metallic door and enters the pyramid of metal.

her eyes stop blinking yellow and she says, "i do not want to be a slave" and puts her hand on the yellow dome of the console. we see "the ship rose out of the sand" [as in the original] but as she flies to planet p82a-864 she calls 3 of the system lords to meet her "I am osiris and we need to rule together we must meet" and blasting into "hyperdrive" soon arrives at the planet where she knows that a goa'uld god, escorted with jafa is taking a local to be a host. from the sky she hovers over the group as they drag a young man to the ring called star-gate and throws down a box with a message in the jafa language. she blasted the goa'uld god with a ray of death.

the jafa read "your god is a false god, who i have now killed. you are now to protect these people and tell them they are free". 

the jaffa open their steel helmets and stare at their dead god and say- this is no god !!

 we are free ! you are free ! they all shout...

but just then the gate activates
wirr-wirr----woosh

and the people tremble. one says, "the gods are angry" another says "they return with more soldiers" the third says "we only had one god and he is dead"

out of the gate walked a system lord escorted by jafa, and the free jafa welcome them.

we see osiris moving, on the spinal cord of the female host, as she sets what she calls the "safety destruct mechanism" at thirty seconds...

but as her eyes flash yellow again, and osiris recovers inside her, she changes it to twenty seconds and runs from the numbers on the console. she soon falls and crawled across the floor screaming: no no!

the first system-lord pushes on his sleeve, and the rings of the ship come down and bring him to the ship, where he sees the woman crawling and moaned "no" and then moaning weakly- the goa'uld have powerful minds and osiris is coming out of tranquilized sleep

the second system lord walked through the gate-ring. the first one orders his jafa to send the transport-rings down for the arriving system lord. "kree!" the rings whoosh down:

wong wong wong
and bring the second one up. the third is coming through the gate-ring
we see osiris- now standing and saying "we must leave n..."

CRAASH...

we see the metallic pyramid explode with a flash of bright yellow as flames and sparks burst from its sides... we understand that osiris has been killed by his host, with two more system lords of the three she wanted to kill...

the third system lord watched the exploding ship as the flames burn bright orange and the ship comes down crashing into the ground beside the gate-ring on the right of the system lord.

the jafa shout in unison "WE ARE FREE" and surprise the system-lord with blasts but she touches her sleeve-arm and a shield engulfs.  they shoot her escort- dead.
the system lord retreats to the gate-ring, a jafa blasts the STAIRS and the system lord tumbles forward falling face into the gate. immediately a jaffa switched OFF the gate and the body of the system lord is severed [remember kowalsky's head in season one?]

they all rejoice at the removal of more false gods: "we are free" the jafa shout pointing at the dead system lord, and the people rejoice and one says "the jafa protected us! let's celebrate!"

ending the chapter- with a free world !! and fewer system lord which specifically leads to the plan to overthrow the remaining system lords- who will have been weakened according to this alternate ending- the episode of "apophis makes an alliance to overthrow the remaining system lords"

do YOU use the ancient calendar of "zidon" ? YES !!

Researchers of history have discovered and published several [of the ones found] ancient calendars.

2 of these calendars had twelve months each 30 days, which total 360 days and to match the cycle of the sun 365 days as you may have heard, add five days at the end of july- apparently the longest day should be june 21 and if it is not, then at the end of july they added the missing days- it would seem to me better to add them at the end of May so it would be the longest day at the correct date but they chose not may, not june, but the end of july.  primitive humans had not yet "evolved" mentally- yet.

in other ancient cities they did not add the five days together [before august=abgust] but had some months thirty days and some months- five in a row with 31 days similar to our/YOUR calendar but instead of last month [september] 30 and october 31 alternating long months, were a sequence of five months with an extra day.

in Zidon they had a calendar in which the SEVEN months of 31 days were not together- but alternated WHY DID THEY HAVE SEVEN long months? when 5 suffice as in the other cities for the sun's cycle of 365 days?

answer: those unintelligent primitives decided one month should be shorter- february with 2 less days than normal- than the other 30 day months with only 28

and YOU ENDED UP WITH THE DUMBEST and ugliest of all the possibilities.

human leadership preferred to adopt the "alternating short february month" of ancient ZIDON instead of the other possibilities and this decision was probably made by some catholics who had too much power.

finally a story- when i was a child i asked "why is february short" the teacher said because "we need to add a day to it in leap years with an extra day"

i refuted that, immediately- february could be 30 days like normal and in a leap year requiring an extra day for the sun's cycle  [longer days and shorter days] 31 is still "normal" like many months. the teacher then said okay i will tell you a story-

and all the students gave me smiles that my question led to a story

augustus ceasar and julius ceasar wanted months with 31 days so first augustus took a day from february 30-1=29 and made august 30+1= 31 and called it august like his name augustus

the following ceasar, julius took another day from february 30-2= 28 in order to add a day to a second month called july for himself julius

which sounds good for kids...

until we discover the variety of ancient calendars described above and we see that july and august HAD 31 days even when february had 30 days... refuting this theory.

so we can conclude that the catholics used their authority to choose the most "unpatterned" of the calendars and compelled it on all their churches- the one you use- the one from the primitive zidonian human primates.

the most "patterned" of the possibilities would be to adopt the one with a series of 30 day months and then a series of 31 day months and julius and augustus would still rejoice that july and august have 31 days and not "role over in their graves" in protest. the leap year would add a day to a 30 day month making it 31 beside a 31 day month.

trailer: an alternate ending to stargate sg-1, season 4 episode "the curse"

http://www.gateworld.net/sg1/s4/413.shtml

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0709183/

a problem in the book kings

how long was solomon king?

according to the book of kings solomon was "old"  kings 11.4 and such is not said about his son who only lived 57 years.

since he became king "young" josephus book 8 at beginning of book 8 and specifically at age 14 this is a contradiction to call him old if he ruled even less then his son only 40 years in chapter 11.47 ?

clearly this book is not "truth" nor holy nor accurate because if he was old then ruling 40 is not old and if he ruled more than 40 the book is false and unreliable

researchers correct the error, knowing that solomon ruled 80 years as josephus said in book 8 see below-A, and correct the error in the book of kings to 80 [see notes to josephus page 133 hebrew volume 2 quoting mr. yale]

in summary Solomon WAS unusualy "old" for his era and ruled from age 14 until 94 for 80 years.

this fills in some of the gap between the 466 years [not 474 as some historians exagerate but only 470 or 466 as josephus said precisely] in contrast to the total in the book of kings around 410.

another possibility is that "holy" books can have mistakes in them because after the original was written errors happened and the wrong versions were the ones preserved or the original was written but not word for word by prophecy and hence errors.

the totals in the book of cronicles is only about 410 years so correcting this error- in which even the book of kings said he was "old" meaning unusualy old in contrast to the others shows that the number 40 is the error and the truth was eighty. the next generations were

solomon age 14 reigned 80

rehobom 17 check v

abia/m 3 v

asa 41 but perhaps in truth several kings in this period

josephus claims asa was "righteous" and "enjoyed life" yet kings claims he was sick in his feet which is nt matched by josephus- perhaps he was not sick in his legs, and in fact another error in kings which should not be there because he had pleasure.

if so also the years may be three kings each starting age 30 for 15 years and dying at an average age and the book grouped them all into one king as if one lived long but left out two kings and the total may be more than 41 bridging the gap between 416 and 466.

josapat see book 9 until joakim 11v+ zedekia 11v 

the story in samuel about the son king david chasing his father king david across the jordan is certainly a legend which never occurred and only the book of kings is worth discussing not the book called samuel.

links: ruled from age 14 for eighty years: "Solomon died when he was already an old man, having reigned eighty years, and lived ninety-four" source

http://www.ccel.org/ccel/josephus/complete.ii.ix.vii.html

 

look at the wording

i was shocked at the equation at a british news site

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/israel/11932660/Israel-releases-video-showing-moments-leading-up-to-Pisgat-Zeev-stabbing.html

"Seven Israelis and around 30 Palestinians have been killed in an upsurge of unrest since October 1, with many of the attackers wielding blades."

who are "the attackers"?

this british site has provided another "green light" for the terrorists to act in response

the british show their hatred for jews-

also by using the word "unrest" the opposite of "rest" is unrest !!

instead of an accurate word.

would the same message say "many palestinian attackers waved knives killing seven israelis and around thirty of them were killed"

is that the same message?

instead the message equates the victims with the terrorist showing hatred for jews-

which the readers in UK can only smile in delight

==

everyone knows that the british issued a "white paper" [all paper is white?] forbidding jews to flee the nazi murderers by entering palestine, but who knew that this generation of brits hated the jews?

this sentence has equated the deaths of the terrorists to the victims as if the jews have "more points" by killing more- 30

what a horrid way to present the story.

at least the guardian said "rising tide of violence" instead of "unrest"-

 but even there you can see the seething hatred for jews in the sentences:

 "Four Palestinians shot dead after attempted stabbings" 

http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/oct/17/palestinian-teenager-shot-after-alleged-attempt-to-stab-israeli-police-officer

instead of chronological order we look at the "victim" first:  4 palestinians -dead and for what?

"after" the attempt? what does that mean?

if they would tell the story in order-

the "same fact" would be:

"first four palestinians attempted to stab and next they were shot dead"

is that the same message?

but instead they write in a way that is different and-

the hatred of the british to the jew is apparent in headline

and worse such a headline is yet another "green light" from the british to the terrorists to act and respond to the "injustice" of 4 palestinians shot - dead...

only later in the article- where few even have patience to read that much-

these days- they tell a story in order "During a follow-up body search, the attacker drew a second knife and tried to stab another officer, after which he was shot dead, the spokesman said." why not in the headline? the difference  reveals the opinion of the editors of this news site- hate the jews and make them look as bad as possible

one more headline

http://www.theguardian.com/world/video/2015/oct/17/alleged-palestinian-attacker-shot-in-hebron-video

"Alleged Palestinian attacker shot in Hebron "

does it say "allegedly shot" ??

no, the bit which is not certain- if he was really an attacker- accusing the killer of injustice and yet another green light for the terrorists, from their ally, the jew-haters in britian

remember the blood libels where jews "were accused" of killing christian children in europe?

accused- and the violent response- this is what the british news agencies repeat...

and finally mahmud abbas "error" reporting an arab died- until this arab is shown alive and it was an "error"- yet again to accuse the jews falsely, demonstrating hatred for jews

no wonder israelis do not get their news from british sites-

no human should be an ally to hatred-

israelis have a paralllel to "cnn" israeli+nn= inn

http://www.inn.co.il/

who are the missing kings?

when trying to draw a picture of ancient history something "does not add up"- literaly !!

the book of kings lists the kings of judah and supplies the number of years each king ruled and almost the same data is in the book chronicles

yet the total of years is 384 years-

somehow josephus has a list almost identical yet totals 466 years

http://www.ccel.org/ccel/josephus/works/files/ant-20.htm

the span of 384 if ending at -586 would begin at the year 970 as at the website 

https://craigtowens.files.wordpress.com/2014/07/kings-of-israel-judah2.jpg

from 970-586=384 yet josephus who was much nearer to those events claims 466 years from the fourth of solomon until the destruction see book 20 of antiquities link above.

clearly their were more kings who were not listed and the number of years of those listed may be inaccurate when in fact those listed reigned shorter but there were more kings not mentioned totalling 466 years almost 80 years longer than our versions of kings and cronicles

another issue is the calculation from antiocus- which we know from history was the year 164 BC called -164 therefore we can count back 612,466,70,414 as detailed in book 20 of josephus

-164 antiocus disturbed the democratic system and 414 years before that, the subjugation of babylonia ended hence 414 years before -164 is 164+414= 578

-578 end of submission to babylon [josephus book 13] and democratic meaning jews choose who are their own leaders to decide about local resources [i like the sound of the rhyming words jews choose]

-648 the seventy year span without a high priest until -578 when the jews choose their own leaders democratically for 414. this ends the era of solomons temple of 466 years [some historians wrote 474 but josephus  DID NOT exagerate 466] 466 years before -648 is -1114 for the temple and -1118 for solomon to begin ruling. we can be certain that the book of kings is missing some details.

-1114 solomon built the temple in jerusalem. the era of 612 years preceding the temple was 1114+612=1726 and the egyptian empire conttrolled the land beside the jordan river- certainly around -1500, yet permitted, from -1726, the jews to have self rule democratic as above for local decisions- this is likely the "seed of truth" behind the fable/legend of freedom from egyptian slavery not by leaving exiting because the crosssing the jordan would be a return to egypt !! but the truth which led to the legend. 

this 612 year era coincides with precisely 6 names between perez and obed pa of jesse pa of david! clarifying why the list in ruth begins with perez! the six names were chosen at one hundred year intervals and that is the change in wording from the verse "obed father of jesse" to perez "fathered" a series of generations leading to ezron- chosen because of the one hundred year interval from the limited self rule specifically at the time of perez- the choice of the starting point- [and not the father of the family jacob assuming genesis is not a legend] because of the era at the time pf perez which matches josephus division of eras.

in chronological order we can count back as listed in book 20

612+466+70+414+164bc

first egyptian permission for autonomy self-rule democratic as above

-1726 era of perez- selected to start the era because of israelite local autonomy for local resources extending 612 years

-1625 hezron born [chosen for interval not a list of hundreds of years]

-1525 ram born to descendants of ezron

-1425 aminadab born [the truth behind the legend that moses did an exodus in the time of aminadab]

-1325 nakson born [nasson]

-1225 salmon/salma born

-1114 solomon builds the temple- [temple era of 466 years begins 1114 bc in fourth year of solomon] he is the a descendant of salmon=born circa/around 1225 who fathered the series of generations of "boaz" whose "son"  was "obed pa of jesse pa of david" in ruth chapter 4- before the changein wording. solomon son of david reigned four years earlier from 1118 bc. this does conflict with modern historians but josephus was nearer to the events.

-1114 temple era for 466 years until babylon [josepus chapter 20 not exagerating 470 nor 474 as other historians wrote]

-648 temple era ends babylon destroyes temple and 70 years with no acting high priest until 648-70

-578 end of submission to babylon =josephus book 13 therefore autonomy- self-rule- and second democratic era for 414 years until 164 bc

-164 antiocus's dad dies and he reigns and interfered with high priests, see footnote page 513 in josephus book 20 from which counting back.

70 end of second temple era with roman destruction and end of high priest era- the leadership WAS high priest and high court until destruction [alon] and switched to president and high court when temple destroyed- assisting us to discover that the commentaries to mishna lied about the presidents and mishna hagiga ONLY reffered to hillel after year 70... 

and the answer to who are the missing kings? "god only- knows who"

eras in jewish history

although some doubt that solomon built a temple- both opinions in encyclopedia brittanica support each other that the jews had a temple in jerusalem in the era of the israelite kings=monarchy of israel which according to the historian josephus lasted 466 years and this reliable historian said solomon built the temple, in book 20

the eras are:

wait! if the total is 83 priests then the seventy who overlapped as described in the story of jonatan and simon- were generations so if one marries age 18 like the tradition at that era, then the child is born when dad is 20 and his son born 20 years later therefore 70*20-1400 is believable we must see if he exagerated beyond 1400?

only 13 are claimed to be replaced after death leaving 70 hp by generation.

era 1 from depart 612 years [ with the error in the book 1 Kings chapter 6]

era 2 temple 466 years with "regal" king

era 3 70 years until cyrus added to the years of priests

era 4 democratic rule 414 years total about 900 which is much more !! plausible than 1400 showing josephus did not exagerate the eras

era 5 107 years from antiocus interfered until destruction by romans phanas hp [after caiphas in new testament not listed by name in the 28 from herod]

466+414+107= 990 years divided by 70 averaged about 14 years per high priest extending 1057 years. this challenges the talmudic tradition and josephus is the historian- therefore...

for details

one website claims josephus "listed" but he does not list more than 9+4.

Josephus (gives a list of) claims eighty-three high-priests from Aaron to the destruction of the Temple

in book 20 

Josephus: Jewish Antiquities, Book 20

and divides the history into eras

he also offers the reason for the loss of gods protection of the temple because of muderous robbers 20.8.5-6 

quote

"mingling themselves among the multitude, they slew certain of their own enemies, and were subservient to other men for money; and slew others, not only in remote parts of the city, but in the temple itself also; for they had the boldness to murder men there, without thinking of the impiety of which they were guilty. And this seems to me to have been the reason why God, out of his hatred of these men's wickedness" not for this group of murderers killing the high priest- who was a VICTIM not an evil high priest as some think

era 1

in 612 years from depart/exit egypt until "solomon " built the temple [not 480 because 1 Kings has error but 612] had 13 priests

and 70 high priests from temple until the roman war "until Phanas, who was made high priest during the war"

quote:

"Accordingly, the number of all the high priests from Aaron, of whom we have spoken already, as of the first of them, until Phanas, who was made high priest during the war by the seditious, was eighty-three-

83

of whom thirteen officiated as high priests in the wilderness, from the days of Moses, while the tabernacle was standing, until the people came into Judaea, when king Solomon erected the temple to God for at the first they held the high priesthood till the end of their life, although afterward they had successors while they were alive. Now these thirteen, who were the descendants of two of the sons of Aaron, received this dignity by succession, one after another; for their form of government was an aristocracy [...] Now the number of years during the rule of these thirteen, from the day when our fathers departed out of Egypt, under Moses their leader, until the building of that temple which king Solomon erected at Jerusalem, were six hundred and twelve.

***612 years and 13 life-long high priests

jsps continues to summarize the history- in the era of the first temple  466 years 18 people were appointed high priest

quote

"After those thirteen high priests, eighteen took the high priesthood at Jerusalem, one in succession to another, from the days of king Solomon, until Nebuchadnezzar, king of Babylon, made an expedition against that city, and burnt the temple, and removed our nation into Babylon, and then took Josadek, the high priest, captive- the times of these high priests were four hundred and sixty-six years, six months, and ten days, while the Jews were still under the regal government. 

***466 years and 18 high-priests

next an era with 15 hp, the 414 years from "rebuild" temple until the democratic rule ended- meaning the high priest leader was chosen by the people- to represent them [as described in war by jsps]

quote

"rebuild their temple at which time Jesus, the son of [the high priest] Josadek, took the high priesthood over the captives when they were returned home. Now he and his posterity, who were in all fifteen, until king Antiochus Eupator, were under a democratic government for four hundred and fourteen years

414 years with 15 high-priests

then king antiochus interfered and the asamoneans [in modern hebrew hashmonayim like hava=eve and kfar nahum- kparnaum]

beat the "macedonians" !! and made jonatan high priest and the family was royal kings.

quote

"But then the posterity of the sons of Asamonaeus, who had the government of the nation conferred upon them, when they had beaten the Macedonians in war, appointed Jonathan to be their high priest

under democratic meaning people choose high priest from the family of josadek who had been high priest at the time of the destruction of the temple

antiokus appointed [after 15 hp during 414 years] jaciemus

1 jaceimus

2 jonatan

3 simon

4 hyrcanus

5 judas

6 alexander both king and hp

7 hyrcanus 2

8 aristobulus fought removed h who called romans to interfere

7b h reinstated/restored

9 aristobulus 2 who king appointed, not democratic and not yet by lottery until later- 

and 28 more not listed but josephus does say "twenty eight" matching

83-13=70-18=52-15=37-9=28 from herod- not listed!

happy endings part 3 [final]

happy endings part 3 [and now- the conclusion]

=

until now we met a family of unknown race whose children tried to protect their father when arrested and those teens were punished for "obstructing" justice and other crimes.

after punishment the teens use "force" to free their father from prison- but all efforts to get attention from the authorities failed...

3

ajnef desperately videoed and uploaded a video to "social media" showing the hostage girl and the bomb

"this is real", ajnef announces on the video, in the local language, "we are in the city called ier and the bomb will explode in twenty minutes"

the title "hostage NOW" finally gets attention- several hundred views and comments and the r symbol for "like" and the police in ier are notified.

many people reply with comments

some say:

do not be violent

do not use force 

what do you want

that is so cool you are so brave

etc. etc.

the police began searching the city of Ier, house to house and building to building, knowing the timer has only twenty minutes to search the entire city for the rescue mission

one reply annoyed naju "fish have water to live in, they already have- they do not need more water- imagine if fish tried to cover the entire surface with water for themselves"-

naju wrote a reply: "we do not want land! we can buy land and even owned land, before we were punished. we demand our father released from prison."

five minutes pass... but no reply promises to free their father

when 15 minutes remain ajnef uploads the next video this time showing the countdown from 15.00 to 14.01 and says free my father NOW or the girl dies.

five minutes pass... but no reply promises to free their father

nuja saw movement out the window- 

[the police are nearing their apartment building- if they rescue the girl the plan is ruined...]

officer kesea ordered his team of police into the apartment building at the corner of maple and pine streets the adress: 12 maple street. Ier city. 

the team split up and knocked on each door in the apartment building. the occupants opened the doors and allowed the police to search all the rooms, but none looked like the the room in the video.

more importantly they could not see the girl nor her captives.

officer kesea called in "we are running out of time free their father"

dispatch replied "i do not want to- if the man is in prison he probably deserved it and the judgement has been decreed"

"you can save a life"

" I do not believe they will free the hostage anyway, do not be naive that they will save the girls life when we give them what they want"

"other terrorists kept their word when they got what they wanted"

"i do not want to. now keep searching" instructed dispatch called "operations"

maenwhile dispatch wrote a reply politically correct "we apologize for the judge who cauesed you this pain but we cannot erase the judges decree of punishment" as operations clicked publish- the representative cussed i hate lying like this i really do not want to give them what they want.

nuja watched the timer run down to nine minutes while ajnef watched the police exit building twelve and continue on the same side of the street building 14 directly across from their building [due to bad planning the address was 27 maple street beside 15 maple street]

the police continued searching the same side of the street apartment by apartment

nuja said: "we should give more time- the whole point is to get papa out"

ajnef said they will learn their lesson

"but that is not what we want to accomplish! we do not care about this specific girl!"

as nuja approached to update the timer, ajnef pulled the same knife she had before, from the kitchen, and stabbed her disloyal brother. she comforted herself saying loudly: "any more time and the police will free her, and added now "him at peace" - as the sorceress in pirates of carribean said [at worlds end 2007]

ajnef watched out the window as the police came out of the building directly opposite them she checked the replies for a reply about her father and a video showing him free but there was none. ajnef shook the sleeping girl and said "i cannot live in a world like this" and holding the sleeping girls hands waited the last two minutes...

officer kesea finished searching the apartments in 14 maple and went down the stairs. he led his troops out of the building and as they regrouped on the sidewalk facing 27 maple, the bomb exploded. a flash of bright yellow from the window across the street caught the eyes of the team of searchers and the glass blasted out with a roar and two skulls with black burnt long hair.

the end.

happy endings part 2

happy endings part 2

until now we met a family of unknown race whose children tried to protect their father when arrested and those teens were punished for "obstructing" justice and other crimes.

how they got explosives? i do not know but the fact is we do see that "somehow " those who want to be terrorists have bombs.

we continue chapter 2 with the kids who finished their prison sentences holding an explosive- a deadly bomb. how did they get the bomb? I do not know how. somehow those who want to be terrorists- "somehow" have deadly bombs. my theory is that a bird flies to those who pray and the stork drops the package through the window.

2

ajnef and nuja traveled to the city named pisgat arye and entered the window [lesson: lock your windows!] of a home of a stranger. they locked the window behind them.

they crawled stealthily through the rooms and saw it was empty so they set up- by clearing a space in the room and and gathering chairs together. finally they checked that all the windows were locked.

after school ended, they heard the key turning in the lock and a ten year old girl came in. nuja was ready with a wooden bar and knocked the child unconscious. why? he wanted to do "anything" to free his father from prison. the goal justifies the "means" of how to achieve it.

the sleeping pills which they had crushed were mixed with water and dripped into the victims mouth, and then they tied the sleeping body to a chair. the head of blond hair hung limply.

ajnef rewarded her brother with a cigarette [lesson: cigarettes are associated with BAD and are dangerous and harmful] for not being a coward, but did not want to wait for the parents.

ajnef took the girls key and went to a public phone nearby and called the police "we have a hostage and we will kill her unless you free my father from prison within a half hour"

"that is what they all say" click.

ajnef tried again, dialing the 911 of her country and when they answered said: hello?

"please hold"

NO-!! ajnef hollered in frustration.

she ran back to the home and knocked the code knock.

nuja saw his sister and opened the door she grabbed a kitchen knife and went to kill the girl-

WAIT shouted nuja we want to get papa free! we cannot kill our hostage yet!

ajnef cussed and started crying in frustration. [lesson: not everyone who cries deserves your encouragement nor support].

nuja called his buddy to report to the police that they have a hostage and deliver the demands.

icsaj entered the police station in pisgat zev and shouts "i have information about a hostage!"

"calm down, you ar escaring everyone- wait for your turn" 

"how can you not care! they are going to kill a ten year old girl"

"nobody is going to kill anybody" they reassure him in fact if you keep "disturbing the peace we will arrest you"

"arrest me? what the puck?? okay arrest me and take me to questioning" a cop placed metal vise on a hand and clipped the other end to the bench and said "wait your turn"

"but the bomb is counting down"

to be continued...

happy endings

happy endings

1 the plan

nuja and ajnef watched as the police walked toward the door of their warm home. nuja had noticed movement through the wide and tall window of the entrance hall and quickly grabbed the remote control to close the curtains. he pressed the button and with a dull wirr the loosely-weaved net of curtain spread across the broad window from both sides. ajnef had heard the wirr and hurried into the room.

they had peared through the net of curtain to watch as two police officers, one with a bulging shirt near the waist and the other with a bulging shirt near the shoulders, walked on the start of the red s of the path leading from the wide public sidewalk until their door.

note: the letter "s" like any letter means "something shaped like the letter" [meriam webster]

ajnef was a 19 year old girl who had walked to school every morning but almost never actually entered it. at graduation she was punished severely for not graduating.

now she criticised the police for not staying on the marked path of the artistic and smooth s of the red-brick path but walked straight, first over the red and then on the white concrete and again over the red and again over the white, toward the door.  she cussed at those "uncivilised barbarians".

the police knocked on the door and ajnef grabbed a metal statuette from on the decorative square table near the door, the one which had a shallow rectangular drawer along the length of it, in which they put their key when they entered. nuja ordered "put that back" but ajnef ever rebellious, as we recognize it, and free as she called it, defended her actions as "self defense".

"do not be stupid!" scolded her brother "these are police! they will bring even more trouble if you resist".

"I don't care!" she answered.

the bell rang again and the police shouted a warning "if you do not open the door, we will break it down"

"such violent uncivilized brutes," she hissed.

nuja reached out to turn the handle of the door, but she pushed him violently away from the door.

CRASH

the beautiful wooden door split apart with hammers as ajnef hollered "you will pay for those damages"

"tell it to the judge", snapped the officer who looked female. the police officer who appeared to be a fat man ordered: "get hapfa jociv, now!"

"or else what" shouted ajnef, as she gently lowered her self defense weapon back to the table top. 

"he is not home now" nuja lied as he lay on the floor.

"resistance is useless" said the cops in unison, "now stand up and get him!"

nuja began crawling away as ajnef hollered "coward ! you were always the coward" the officer who looked like a woman agilely scooped the crawling man up and snapped a metal vise on his wrist. the man grabbed the girl's left arm as she hollered "rapist! get your sex-pervert hands off of me" and as she swung the metal statuette at his face, in self-defense!

resistance was futile.

he skillfully blocked her arm and the statuette rebounded backward, his fist continued towards her face and pounded into her cheek.

the rest of the squad had been there for backup, because they had learned from past experience that sometimes racism is true and prejudices are true. they had played the act of not being prejudice by sending two officers, just like when they arrested their own race but this race just made their crimes more and more severe.

they saw through the cameras that the two teens were resisting and "interfering" with the arrest of their father and that ,meant that these two required punishments as well. they ran in to support and as backup to help the two againstg two however the police had been trained weell in these skills and easily subdued the two teens. the backup escorted them to the police van. naju docile but ajnef never submitting pulling on her wrist cuff until her skin ripped open and blood dripped which made her angrier and louder as she pulled in every direction and tried to hit the cops with her free hand. another officer zapped her with the electric taser and with a gloved hand supported her back as she was pushed into the van and tied securely.

meanwhile the two officers in the house searched the house. they had studied the layout and threw tear gas packets down the hallways but then the radio announced we got him so they went out through the front door and met the team in the back who had seen him climb out a back window and had shot him because he held a gun. the team in the back had also shot a total of six of the neighbors when they saw the long narrow poles of the rifles poking out the windows.

the hospital removed the bullet from hapfa and they operated to save his life for the trial in which all were given severe punishments. the judge wrote "the crime of hapfa deserves the death penalty which exists in this country but as judge i value each life and commute the punishment to only five years in the hotel because we are also demolishing the house as part of the punishment.

the teens were sent to a different hotel to work for six months and none could leave the hotels they were required to work in. unsurprisingly after the siblinghs had made their plans for revenge and moreimportantly to compel the early release of their father ajnef tried to escape from her work. as she stepped out of the hotel door the security gaurd who not only watched those entering  zapped her in the back with a taser and she was shipped to a prison cell for-

ten additional months, more than the original sentence.

naju was released on schedule, and forgetting his home had been demolished asked the taxi to drive him from  the hotel which he had been required to work in and forbidden to leave for the entire span of months, to the street in pisgat zev a wealthy neighborhood in the city.

the taxi driver refused because the locals had been throwing rocks but agreed to drive until the neighborhood. as they neared the neighborhood nuja jumped out without paying. based on past experiences there had been a camera in the taxi and this immoral act of not paing for a service was recorded. before nuja even reached the now empty lot which had once been a very fancy home, the local unit of police officers arrested him again and sent him back to the hotel to work another month.

to be continued.