I have received some criticism from critics of my idea and I admit some of them deserve replies
my choice of years is not appropriate since the "middle ages" ended more than 500 years ago
I accept the idea that locke was a great influence to the "age of enlightenment" and as a result the year number should not be 515 but rather 2015-1632
if so before locke we can call "before counting"=BC without any religion and without granting the birth of locke any religious significance by using the letter "p" for pre-, while counting from this point as the beginning of our age.
Hence this year can be called 383 until the next solar cycle aftyer the shortest day as explained on what the contract calendar would call december 22, and that is actually preferable because it generalizes the calendar to demonstrate- the performance of the work "alls well that ends well 1602" we may use a "secular" calendar instead of "jesus christ" and say in the year "30p" [pre-enlightenment] the play alls well that ends well was performed.
from the sun-cycle of december 22 of the contract calendar began the year 383 because our age is the age called enlightenment
http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/345753/John-Locke
until the end of the solar cycle on the shortest day in about 8 months based on nature-
in the secular calendar we have begun the fifth month of 383 as I will explain more tomorrow.
אין תגובות:
הוסף רשומת תגובה