twenty six 26 books in 24 hours or 6 books in 6 minutes!

someone recommended I listen to a summary of the old testament. the idea was to summarise the books of the old-testament I count 26 books, IN 24 lectures each one hour.

to feel the PACE I started with the second "lecture" and it was about exodus.

when summarising genesis it can be summarised as "many hate stories" and therefore a book to avoid and not summarise further.

*genesis summary: this book has many hate stories and also stories with a message of injustice... that is the summary and reason cause to avoid the bad contents.

introduction: exodus can be summarised in three parts 1 going out of egypt with plagues, 2 laws 3 the wood-tent. note when summarising exodus and leviticus
***only twenty minutes remained in the lecture for "numbers" book so the lecturer failed and did not summarize the contents of numbers but only a few bits.
*** worse was the failure with less than five 5 minutes to summarize the long book deuteronomy handled by saying "all of deuteronomy is 'god is one' the end" failure to summarize the contents. so the whole mission I challenge and reject and warn to avoid plus I will attempt to replace.

*exodus this book is already summarized in the book of joshua: joshua 24 "the israelites entered egypt and moses with aron led the israelites out and egypts suffered from plagues. the egyptian army chased them to the sea and the sea covered the egyptians. then the israelites dwelled in the desert for many years." who decides what is important joshua or god through the prophet named joshua that is the summary. this summarises part one the going out is with plagues. the seconfd part when moses went up we should wait and see if he taught it when he came down so skip from going up to vcoming down in chpter 34-35. the third part is a problem, if the book chronicles is true then god DENIED asking for a wood tent also second-samuel-7 and the book exodus lied. bad book also self-contradiction in years of generation in egypt 350 or less against 430 so the book certainly is a bad book. jews corrupt the second source claiming 200 years will christians corrupt the other source claiming 400 years like abraham also not 430. bad book and no wooden tent so we conclude exodus.

*leviticus summary: if we believe jospeus the animal-sacrifices for sin are with the holiday sacrifices and should not be interrupted so it is good to remove chapters 4 to 23. the sacrifices themselves are a problem if we beilieve the book of jeremia is good as religions teach then god DENIED commanding animal sacrifices with the word no/not I did not caommand sacrifices in the context of EAT them yourselves a similar message on isiah wich the religious corrupt but we should not believe the lies of leviticus because the god of israelites said through jeremia i did not command so believe god and reject the bad book of lies calledlevitivcus.

we have arrivesd at numbers with much more than twenty minutes.
*numbers too is summarised in joshua 24 and in the summary what is imprtant? god chose what is important in the summary. so the summary in joshua (24) is not only brief but truly is a complete summary which can replace all the pages from the start of "genesis until the end of joshua, end of chapter 23" without most of joshua itself because "not with your sword" reveals the lies in the beginning of the book joshua. six books in about six minutes!

clarification

in my previous post I described obama "shooting wildly in all directions"

http://tomsawyerssongs.blogspot.co.il/2017/01/obama-against-israel.html

 insulting russia with ambassador story and not helping the middle-eastern-ally Israel in the UN. it is easy to convince one person to be anti-israel especially if obama studied under muslim education as a child but to get a majority in congress to oppose obama shows that these congressman understand diplomacy and alliances. BRITIAN criticised the obama administration for being too harsh with israel. now I clarify what I refferred to in britian relations.

instead of apologizing, in response to british criticsm, obama shot back at the british, criticising their criticsm- as published NINE DAYS AGO not as I wrote "weeks ago" I refferred to the criticism and claimed obama was ending his diplomacy, now that he NO LONGER NEEDS the cooperation for his personal agenda so he can insult all over.

I concluded that this demonstrates that obama was what the racists suspected. there is some doubt which of obama's race and religion can be trusted and which cannot be trusted because their loyalty is first to something else but there is NO DOUBT and with certainty that the total of convicted criminals of all races plus "committed crimes not yet caught" would be much-much lower if those in obama's race were busy in the cotton fields. whether president or judges who might be "loyal first to their own race before justice" hence if all of that race would still be slaves, in the past, then with certainty the number of committed crimes as well as convicted criminals would be much much less.

could the first step to making a significant reduction in crime be slavery? I will need to study the statistics and demographics.

this site should show the demographics but hides them
https://www.bjs.gov/index.cfm?ty=tp&tid=942

oh well. 

obama against... israel?

recently the United nations criticed Israel about something. was

obama's decision (not to veto) AGAINST israel?

considering that obama also pissed off the russians at the same time, by sending away ambasadors as well as insulting britian a few weeks ago.

*we see a pattern this is not specifically anti-israel but the fact that obama NO LONGER NEEDS TO COOPERATE INTERNATIONALLY so he insults everyone he personnaly does not need.

this is because until now he needed international cooperation but no longer. 

he hopes that the pissed off allies will want revenge at america but putin and the allies are aware that obama is the decider and wait patiently to cooperate with trump showing just how bad obama is and who is the bigger man.

obama showed himself to be what every racist suspected him to be. if only obama was still a slave in the south. what is done is done.

the british hypocrytes complain about this despite they voted for "israels condemnation" huh?

http://www.reuters.com/article/us-israel-palestinians-britain-idUSKBN14J0L0

 and then accuse obama for not veto-ing- there can be some explanation:

they only voted thinking it WOULD HAVE  been veto-ed? hmm.

"non-biblical" christmas

it is common for protestants to REJECT ideas from catholic and other sources because they are "un-biblical" for example no santa on christmas etc. yet if so, we must consider the fact that jesus never taught his disciples, not even once in ALL four gospels to celebrate nor even mark the date of his "dwelling with" humans, nor his birth, nor his coming to the earth nor his birthday.

even if we go one step away from jesus' teachings to the practices in the book of acts the "original" christians never taught this "important" holiday of christmas in any form.

it is time for protestants to teach that "christmas" in any form is unbiblical without basis in the bible. and to stop succumbing to social norms.

teach the churchgoers we will not celebrate jesus having been born in any way not just the ddetails of santa or the tree but every detail not in the bible in any form. instead the teaching before christmas should be that jesus DIDD NOT teach to celebrate christmas in any form and no mass on december 25.

abraham was an alien- in which sense!

genesis 23.2-4

abraham said he is an alien.

traditional religions [jewish and christian] assume and teach that all genesis stories from creation are on this planet named Earth. admittedly the translations did not capitalize the letter 'e' of earth [genisis 1.1] and it might not refer to planet earth.

then religions insist people lived hundreds of years because the bible is true.

but what if abraham traveled from PLANET ur?

we have several puzzle pieces to assemble.

joshua 24.1-3 said "god took abraham" what if that does not mean walking!

this "god" is called plural in genesis 20.13
http://www.mechon-mamre.org/p/pt/pt0120.htm

this is not a spirit-god but gods who sent abraham.

if we accept this, then some problems vanish.

admittedly the bible might be false.

however if we say "took" means a super-being "took abraham" then it could be from PLANET ur.

we know that the orbit of  planet mercury takes less Earth-days than venus and venus's is less Earth-days than Earth's.

if genesis 11.14-15 is not "false" inaccurate then 433 years might not be Earth-years.

if it would be mercury-years it would be 433*88 Earth-days are 104 earth-years of orbits.

if someone came from a planet of EDEN frm whence where adam was rejected where the orbit was faster than mercury then upon arriving at the new planet they would say many years and only live 365*80 earth-days. this could be the commentary of PSALMS to genesis the biblical years were all 70-80 years.

planet EDEN might have had a fast orbit and less length, 30 earth-days [faster than mercury] and then it would not be false to say that 80 earth-years is counted as 900 orbits of Eden, the source of adam and his descendants.

noah was in a boat and could not see what happened for forty days. he thought he stayed on the same planet for a flood. but the lifespan reveals a different orbit speed. I will call the second place: planet noah but the bible might refer to it as PLANET ur. those who lived 80 earth years and called it 900 were counting eden-orbits.

upon arriving on planet mercury, then with water, unlike now, they did not live 900 orbits but 80*365 earth days which on mercury is about a quarter of years- 400 is like 100. perhaps then mercury-orbit was not 88 earth days but 80 earth days. 433*80=95 years.

a magical creature that wasnot spirit but magical physical "took" abraham- if joshua is not false as religions claim and with magic took from planet UR to the land of canaan on earth. 

his life was much less than those on planet ur because human life on this planet is 70-80 years as in psalms.

we may summarise three planets. eden and the expulsion to planet 2 perhaps named ur.

then abraham ws "taken" by a "god" powerful magician from planet ur to the 3 planet Earth where the story continues.

although on earth science has revealed the order of paleozoic first fish [who ate fish] then scorpions who ate each other and finally plants, genesis was not describing this planet EARTH, but a planet with a fast orbit and there the order was the reverse: plants and later fish called EDEN and those were the years counted on planet ur after rejection from eden.

or the bible lied.

close EPA - ?

in new york now the temperature is literraly freezing.

if i would put some water in a plastic cup and put it outdorrs the water would change to ice.

today december 15, the temperature is significantly COLDER than the average of the last thirty years. the average in new york would be a cold 43 degrees, yet the temperature is ACTUALLY below freezing below 32 farenheit by four degrees farenheit.

so people who claim the climate is changing because of methane and "greenhouse" are not only revealed a liars but as "alarmists" fanatics-falsely because the fact is the increased heat of industry and so called greenhouse gasses are not increasing the heat.

but they will say that is only today!

one day is still evidebce because if TRULY we had an impact on the climate the heat would constantly increase.

assiming warming causing flooding like the alarmists show us on tv, then the cooling we see today can calm us no flooding.

what about a weekly trend?

last week called december 4, 2016

the historical average was 46 degrees f. yet the actual temperature for that week was consistantly COOLER  than painfully-cold 43 degrees f.

the global warming alarmists will point at the one date fifth, when the temperature was slightly warmer yet still painfully cold: 49f instead of 46f and still painfully cold even with a coat, yet more days were colder two which is more than one and not only colder than the three degree difference between 46-49 but significantly colder -two days five and ten degrees colder whereas most of the week was the same as average so the trend is that the gasses are not increasing the heat- most days are the same and the exceptions are significantly colder.

 so hearing about more floods than before the internet does not mean there are actually more floods but that information can be spread faster because in fact the trens is the same or on more days SIGNIFICANTLY COLDER

after studying the evidence it is time to end the lies of the alarmists in the so-called environmental protection agency and hope that the SANE voice of the "skeptics" will guide president trump and remove "authority" from emotional-alarmists who mislead people when the facts can easily be compared- and cut the budget-spending.

the epa people can still have "freedom to lie" but not as an agency and with no authority to act.

zoo second attempt

when I was a child my mother made a mean joke when we went to the zoo. "how would you like to be behind bars like that animal."
sound mean until we think of a baby's crib - !
actually PRISON is very different from a zoo because. whereas humans kill- can kill and do kill- each other in prisons and out of prisons the animals are protected in a zoo like a baby in a crib.
when we hear that the number of a certain type of panda the giant panda is less than 2000, we must consider that only a few years ago there were LESS - !!
increasing from 1860 in 2014 to closer to 2000 now- and that is only one of the types of panda.
in fact the dumb animals, like babies, would- without bars- go out and get killed by hunters so the zoo is like a baby's crib bars. preventing the child from going out into danger of the street.
granting food and needs and protection, true protection unlike prisons.
so I am as pro-zoo as pro-crib.
crib has a bar is that evil? it keeps the ignorant baby from going into the street where cars go. and the same for dumb animals.