self contradiction

if something self-contradicts- then we know it is not reliable

the "great" book of the universe and noble and miraculous teaches

"40. The recompense of an evil deed can only be an evil equal to it;"

noble quran 42.40 with a commentary "retaliation"

http://mquran.org/content/view/4312/4/

we must be AWARE what the muslims read in their book "how to live".

since the book also says to forgive, someone should teach the rock throwers in the middle-east who demand "end the occupation" about israeli occupation, to "forgive"

somehow us "deniers" of muhamed, hear about the islamic requirement to forgive- while in actions the muslims in the middle east prefer verse 40 above. and what is considered "equal" retaliation?

clearly no muslim teacher tells them to "forgive" the israeli occupation, despite the quotes to "forgive" at the site

http://islamqa.info/en/8894

that is only to mislead us- the deniers- so we will not be prepared...

no luck

hapless

ts

:

I was relaxing on some hay

ma said "hey, pick the haws I hae"

even meaner is my harsh pa

when I complained he just said "ha!"

"do it! hie! when i was your age

i sawed and made a wooden h

i said "hah! you know about wood?"

wood is more fun i wish i could.

*meaning

hey> I want you to listen

haw>the berry of the hawthorn

hae>hold in possession

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/hae

ha=hah>I am surprised

hie>to hurry

**

for more h words

http://israblog.nana10.co.il/blogread.asp?blog=748803&blogcode=13870584

**

current events

I find it shocking- that at a time [october 18] when "hamas wants revenge" with the word revenge

site:   http://www.israelhayom.com/site/newsletter_article.php?id=28995

this is the only website that mentions it. 

yahoo news only used the word "revenge" about jews, but not for muslim terrorists showing a double-standard for making the jew look bad. 

the horrid jew does bad revenge but not the holy muslims.

muslims are "fresh" and good but the jew does bad revenge 

"fresh wave of stabbings also hit Israel and the West Bank, including a revenge attack by a Jewish suspect"

site:   AFP via Yahoo! NewsOct 09 03:55 PM

 they only use the word for a jew but not for a muslim- the muslims "defend" a mosque-

by killing a jew far away from the mosque, who is no threat. 

that is not bad revenge, only jews do bad revenge.

several searches "revenge" showed numerous websites who refuse to say the terrorists want revenge- the websites refused to use the word revenge unless they are accusing a jew of revenge.

if not for this site i would not find the word, it is concealed even about hamas. 

noone wants the arabs to look "bad" the word revenge can only be used when reporting about jews- 

the fact is: terrorists often explain violence to hurt jews as "revenge" for something the jews did.

they say it so often that we understand that the quran does not really obligate them to forgive- despite the quotes they tell us deniers- to make us unprepared.

we see the incitement and actions of "not obeying the quran to forgive"

someone should teach the muslims- what jet li taught

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0446059/

in the biography of Chinese Martial Arts Master Huo Yuanjia "do not do revenge because revenge adds more bloodshed"

revenge is wicked and bad and evil

when a terrorist said "I killed a jew in revenge" that shows the wickedness not only of the specific terrorist-

but also of the muslim faith which, despite its book, islamic teachers have taught the act of revenge.

osiris returns

alternate ending to stargate sg-1 "the curse"

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0709183/

http://www.gateworld.net/sg1/s4/413.shtml

after daniel pushes a dart with tranquilizer into the "female host" of osiris ""Daniel resists,and plunges a tranquilizer dart into the Goa'uld's side. Osiris reels back, and moves toward a console. He activates a Goa'uld ship buried in the sands near the temple and,promising to return one day and to make the rivers of Earth "run red with blood," Osiris uses transport rings to escape to the ship and flee. "

after daniel pushes a dart with tranquilizer fluid into the "female host" of osiris, she uses the artifact to open the rocks and run through the opening. daniel crawled after her but the old stones, on a sliding steel door, slam shut behind her. inside the cavern the goa'uld osiris is falling asleep- tranquilized by the chemical and struggles to control the host- her eyes flash yellow light which fades. she presses the artifact again on the panel of a metallic door and enters the pyramid of metal.

her eyes stop blinking yellow and she says, "i do not want to be a slave" and puts her hand on the yellow dome of the console. we see "the ship rose out of the sand" [as in the original] but as she flies to planet p82a-864 she calls 3 of the system lords to meet her "I am osiris and we need to rule together we must meet" and blasting into "hyperdrive" soon arrives at the planet where she knows that a goa'uld god, escorted with jafa is taking a local to be a host. from the sky she hovers over the group as they drag a young man to the ring called star-gate and throws down a box with a message in the jafa language. she blasted the goa'uld god with a ray of death.

the jafa read "your god is a false god, who i have now killed. you are now to protect these people and tell them they are free". 

the jaffa open their steel helmets and stare at their dead god and say- this is no god !!

 we are free ! you are free ! they all shout...

but just then the gate activates
wirr-wirr----woosh

and the people tremble. one says, "the gods are angry" another says "they return with more soldiers" the third says "we only had one god and he is dead"

out of the gate walked a system lord escorted by jafa, and the free jafa welcome them.

we see osiris moving, on the spinal cord of the female host, as she sets what she calls the "safety destruct mechanism" at thirty seconds...

but as her eyes flash yellow again, and osiris recovers inside her, she changes it to twenty seconds and runs from the numbers on the console. she soon falls and crawled across the floor screaming: no no!

the first system-lord pushes on his sleeve, and the rings of the ship come down and bring him to the ship, where he sees the woman crawling and moaned "no" and then moaning weakly- the goa'uld have powerful minds and osiris is coming out of tranquilized sleep

the second system lord walked through the gate-ring. the first one orders his jafa to send the transport-rings down for the arriving system lord. "kree!" the rings whoosh down:

wong wong wong
and bring the second one up. the third is coming through the gate-ring
we see osiris- now standing and saying "we must leave n..."

CRAASH...

we see the metallic pyramid explode with a flash of bright yellow as flames and sparks burst from its sides... we understand that osiris has been killed by his host, with two more system lords of the three she wanted to kill...

the third system lord watched the exploding ship as the flames burn bright orange and the ship comes down crashing into the ground beside the gate-ring on the right of the system lord.

the jafa shout in unison "WE ARE FREE" and surprise the system-lord with blasts but she touches her sleeve-arm and a shield engulfs.  they shoot her escort- dead.
the system lord retreats to the gate-ring, a jafa blasts the STAIRS and the system lord tumbles forward falling face into the gate. immediately a jaffa switched OFF the gate and the body of the system lord is severed [remember kowalsky's head in season one?]

they all rejoice at the removal of more false gods: "we are free" the jafa shout pointing at the dead system lord, and the people rejoice and one says "the jafa protected us! let's celebrate!"

ending the chapter- with a free world !! and fewer system lord which specifically leads to the plan to overthrow the remaining system lords- who will have been weakened according to this alternate ending- the episode of "apophis makes an alliance to overthrow the remaining system lords"

do YOU use the ancient calendar of "zidon" ? YES !!

Researchers of history have discovered and published several [of the ones found] ancient calendars.

2 of these calendars had twelve months each 30 days, which total 360 days and to match the cycle of the sun 365 days as you may have heard, add five days at the end of july- apparently the longest day should be june 21 and if it is not, then at the end of july they added the missing days- it would seem to me better to add them at the end of May so it would be the longest day at the correct date but they chose not may, not june, but the end of july.  primitive humans had not yet "evolved" mentally- yet.

in other ancient cities they did not add the five days together [before august=abgust] but had some months thirty days and some months- five in a row with 31 days similar to our/YOUR calendar but instead of last month [september] 30 and october 31 alternating long months, were a sequence of five months with an extra day.

in Zidon they had a calendar in which the SEVEN months of 31 days were not together- but alternated WHY DID THEY HAVE SEVEN long months? when 5 suffice as in the other cities for the sun's cycle of 365 days?

answer: those unintelligent primitives decided one month should be shorter- february with 2 less days than normal- than the other 30 day months with only 28

and YOU ENDED UP WITH THE DUMBEST and ugliest of all the possibilities.

human leadership preferred to adopt the "alternating short february month" of ancient ZIDON instead of the other possibilities and this decision was probably made by some catholics who had too much power.

finally a story- when i was a child i asked "why is february short" the teacher said because "we need to add a day to it in leap years with an extra day"

i refuted that, immediately- february could be 30 days like normal and in a leap year requiring an extra day for the sun's cycle  [longer days and shorter days] 31 is still "normal" like many months. the teacher then said okay i will tell you a story-

and all the students gave me smiles that my question led to a story

augustus ceasar and julius ceasar wanted months with 31 days so first augustus took a day from february 30-1=29 and made august 30+1= 31 and called it august like his name augustus

the following ceasar, julius took another day from february 30-2= 28 in order to add a day to a second month called july for himself julius

which sounds good for kids...

until we discover the variety of ancient calendars described above and we see that july and august HAD 31 days even when february had 30 days... refuting this theory.

so we can conclude that the catholics used their authority to choose the most "unpatterned" of the calendars and compelled it on all their churches- the one you use- the one from the primitive zidonian human primates.

the most "patterned" of the possibilities would be to adopt the one with a series of 30 day months and then a series of 31 day months and julius and augustus would still rejoice that july and august have 31 days and not "role over in their graves" in protest. the leap year would add a day to a 30 day month making it 31 beside a 31 day month.

trailer: an alternate ending to stargate sg-1, season 4 episode "the curse"

http://www.gateworld.net/sg1/s4/413.shtml

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0709183/

a problem in the book kings

how long was solomon king?

according to the book of kings solomon was "old"  kings 11.4 and such is not said about his son who only lived 57 years.

since he became king "young" josephus book 8 at beginning of book 8 and specifically at age 14 this is a contradiction to call him old if he ruled even less then his son only 40 years in chapter 11.47 ?

clearly this book is not "truth" nor holy nor accurate because if he was old then ruling 40 is not old and if he ruled more than 40 the book is false and unreliable

researchers correct the error, knowing that solomon ruled 80 years as josephus said in book 8 see below-A, and correct the error in the book of kings to 80 [see notes to josephus page 133 hebrew volume 2 quoting mr. yale]

in summary Solomon WAS unusualy "old" for his era and ruled from age 14 until 94 for 80 years.

this fills in some of the gap between the 466 years [not 474 as some historians exagerate but only 470 or 466 as josephus said precisely] in contrast to the total in the book of kings around 410.

another possibility is that "holy" books can have mistakes in them because after the original was written errors happened and the wrong versions were the ones preserved or the original was written but not word for word by prophecy and hence errors.

the totals in the book of cronicles is only about 410 years so correcting this error- in which even the book of kings said he was "old" meaning unusualy old in contrast to the others shows that the number 40 is the error and the truth was eighty. the next generations were

solomon age 14 reigned 80

rehobom 17 check v

abia/m 3 v

asa 41 but perhaps in truth several kings in this period

josephus claims asa was "righteous" and "enjoyed life" yet kings claims he was sick in his feet which is nt matched by josephus- perhaps he was not sick in his legs, and in fact another error in kings which should not be there because he had pleasure.

if so also the years may be three kings each starting age 30 for 15 years and dying at an average age and the book grouped them all into one king as if one lived long but left out two kings and the total may be more than 41 bridging the gap between 416 and 466.

josapat see book 9 until joakim 11v+ zedekia 11v 

the story in samuel about the son king david chasing his father king david across the jordan is certainly a legend which never occurred and only the book of kings is worth discussing not the book called samuel.

links: ruled from age 14 for eighty years: "Solomon died when he was already an old man, having reigned eighty years, and lived ninety-four" source

http://www.ccel.org/ccel/josephus/complete.ii.ix.vii.html

 

look at the wording

i was shocked at the equation at a british news site

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/israel/11932660/Israel-releases-video-showing-moments-leading-up-to-Pisgat-Zeev-stabbing.html

"Seven Israelis and around 30 Palestinians have been killed in an upsurge of unrest since October 1, with many of the attackers wielding blades."

who are "the attackers"?

this british site has provided another "green light" for the terrorists to act in response

the british show their hatred for jews-

also by using the word "unrest" the opposite of "rest" is unrest !!

instead of an accurate word.

would the same message say "many palestinian attackers waved knives killing seven israelis and around thirty of them were killed"

is that the same message?

instead the message equates the victims with the terrorist showing hatred for jews-

which the readers in UK can only smile in delight

==

everyone knows that the british issued a "white paper" [all paper is white?] forbidding jews to flee the nazi murderers by entering palestine, but who knew that this generation of brits hated the jews?

this sentence has equated the deaths of the terrorists to the victims as if the jews have "more points" by killing more- 30

what a horrid way to present the story.

at least the guardian said "rising tide of violence" instead of "unrest"-

 but even there you can see the seething hatred for jews in the sentences:

 "Four Palestinians shot dead after attempted stabbings" 

http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/oct/17/palestinian-teenager-shot-after-alleged-attempt-to-stab-israeli-police-officer

instead of chronological order we look at the "victim" first:  4 palestinians -dead and for what?

"after" the attempt? what does that mean?

if they would tell the story in order-

the "same fact" would be:

"first four palestinians attempted to stab and next they were shot dead"

is that the same message?

but instead they write in a way that is different and-

the hatred of the british to the jew is apparent in headline

and worse such a headline is yet another "green light" from the british to the terrorists to act and respond to the "injustice" of 4 palestinians shot - dead...

only later in the article- where few even have patience to read that much-

these days- they tell a story in order "During a follow-up body search, the attacker drew a second knife and tried to stab another officer, after which he was shot dead, the spokesman said." why not in the headline? the difference  reveals the opinion of the editors of this news site- hate the jews and make them look as bad as possible

one more headline

http://www.theguardian.com/world/video/2015/oct/17/alleged-palestinian-attacker-shot-in-hebron-video

"Alleged Palestinian attacker shot in Hebron "

does it say "allegedly shot" ??

no, the bit which is not certain- if he was really an attacker- accusing the killer of injustice and yet another green light for the terrorists, from their ally, the jew-haters in britian

remember the blood libels where jews "were accused" of killing christian children in europe?

accused- and the violent response- this is what the british news agencies repeat...

and finally mahmud abbas "error" reporting an arab died- until this arab is shown alive and it was an "error"- yet again to accuse the jews falsely, demonstrating hatred for jews

no wonder israelis do not get their news from british sites-

no human should be an ally to hatred-

israelis have a paralllel to "cnn" israeli+nn= inn

http://www.inn.co.il/

who are the missing kings?

when trying to draw a picture of ancient history something "does not add up"- literaly !!

the book of kings lists the kings of judah and supplies the number of years each king ruled and almost the same data is in the book chronicles

yet the total of years is 384 years-

somehow josephus has a list almost identical yet totals 466 years

http://www.ccel.org/ccel/josephus/works/files/ant-20.htm

the span of 384 if ending at -586 would begin at the year 970 as at the website 

https://craigtowens.files.wordpress.com/2014/07/kings-of-israel-judah2.jpg

from 970-586=384 yet josephus who was much nearer to those events claims 466 years from the fourth of solomon until the destruction see book 20 of antiquities link above.

clearly their were more kings who were not listed and the number of years of those listed may be inaccurate when in fact those listed reigned shorter but there were more kings not mentioned totalling 466 years almost 80 years longer than our versions of kings and cronicles

another issue is the calculation from antiocus- which we know from history was the year 164 BC called -164 therefore we can count back 612,466,70,414 as detailed in book 20 of josephus

-164 antiocus disturbed the democratic system and 414 years before that, the subjugation of babylonia ended hence 414 years before -164 is 164+414= 578

-578 end of submission to babylon [josephus book 13] and democratic meaning jews choose who are their own leaders to decide about local resources [i like the sound of the rhyming words jews choose]

-648 the seventy year span without a high priest until -578 when the jews choose their own leaders democratically for 414. this ends the era of solomons temple of 466 years [some historians wrote 474 but josephus  DID NOT exagerate 466] 466 years before -648 is -1114 for the temple and -1118 for solomon to begin ruling. we can be certain that the book of kings is missing some details.

-1114 solomon built the temple in jerusalem. the era of 612 years preceding the temple was 1114+612=1726 and the egyptian empire conttrolled the land beside the jordan river- certainly around -1500, yet permitted, from -1726, the jews to have self rule democratic as above for local decisions- this is likely the "seed of truth" behind the fable/legend of freedom from egyptian slavery not by leaving exiting because the crosssing the jordan would be a return to egypt !! but the truth which led to the legend. 

this 612 year era coincides with precisely 6 names between perez and obed pa of jesse pa of david! clarifying why the list in ruth begins with perez! the six names were chosen at one hundred year intervals and that is the change in wording from the verse "obed father of jesse" to perez "fathered" a series of generations leading to ezron- chosen because of the one hundred year interval from the limited self rule specifically at the time of perez- the choice of the starting point- [and not the father of the family jacob assuming genesis is not a legend] because of the era at the time pf perez which matches josephus division of eras.

in chronological order we can count back as listed in book 20

612+466+70+414+164bc

first egyptian permission for autonomy self-rule democratic as above

-1726 era of perez- selected to start the era because of israelite local autonomy for local resources extending 612 years

-1625 hezron born [chosen for interval not a list of hundreds of years]

-1525 ram born to descendants of ezron

-1425 aminadab born [the truth behind the legend that moses did an exodus in the time of aminadab]

-1325 nakson born [nasson]

-1225 salmon/salma born

-1114 solomon builds the temple- [temple era of 466 years begins 1114 bc in fourth year of solomon] he is the a descendant of salmon=born circa/around 1225 who fathered the series of generations of "boaz" whose "son"  was "obed pa of jesse pa of david" in ruth chapter 4- before the changein wording. solomon son of david reigned four years earlier from 1118 bc. this does conflict with modern historians but josephus was nearer to the events.

-1114 temple era for 466 years until babylon [josepus chapter 20 not exagerating 470 nor 474 as other historians wrote]

-648 temple era ends babylon destroyes temple and 70 years with no acting high priest until 648-70

-578 end of submission to babylon =josephus book 13 therefore autonomy- self-rule- and second democratic era for 414 years until 164 bc

-164 antiocus's dad dies and he reigns and interfered with high priests, see footnote page 513 in josephus book 20 from which counting back.

70 end of second temple era with roman destruction and end of high priest era- the leadership WAS high priest and high court until destruction [alon] and switched to president and high court when temple destroyed- assisting us to discover that the commentaries to mishna lied about the presidents and mishna hagiga ONLY reffered to hillel after year 70... 

and the answer to who are the missing kings? "god only- knows who"