twenty six 26 books in 24 hours or 6 books in 6 minutes!

someone recommended I listen to a summary of the old testament. the idea was to summarise the books of the old-testament I count 26 books, IN 24 lectures each one hour.

to feel the PACE I started with the second "lecture" and it was about exodus.

when summarising genesis it can be summarised as "many hate stories" and therefore a book to avoid and not summarise further.

*genesis summary: this book has many hate stories and also stories with a message of injustice... that is the summary and reason cause to avoid the bad contents.

introduction: exodus can be summarised in three parts 1 going out of egypt with plagues, 2 laws 3 the wood-tent. note when summarising exodus and leviticus
***only twenty minutes remained in the lecture for "numbers" book so the lecturer failed and did not summarize the contents of numbers but only a few bits.
*** worse was the failure with less than five 5 minutes to summarize the long book deuteronomy handled by saying "all of deuteronomy is 'god is one' the end" failure to summarize the contents. so the whole mission I challenge and reject and warn to avoid plus I will attempt to replace.

*exodus this book is already summarized in the book of joshua: joshua 24 "the israelites entered egypt and moses with aron led the israelites out and egypts suffered from plagues. the egyptian army chased them to the sea and the sea covered the egyptians. then the israelites dwelled in the desert for many years." who decides what is important joshua or god through the prophet named joshua that is the summary. this summarises part one the going out is with plagues. the seconfd part when moses went up we should wait and see if he taught it when he came down so skip from going up to vcoming down in chpter 34-35. the third part is a problem, if the book chronicles is true then god DENIED asking for a wood tent also second-samuel-7 and the book exodus lied. bad book also self-contradiction in years of generation in egypt 350 or less against 430 so the book certainly is a bad book. jews corrupt the second source claiming 200 years will christians corrupt the other source claiming 400 years like abraham also not 430. bad book and no wooden tent so we conclude exodus.

*leviticus summary: if we believe jospeus the animal-sacrifices for sin are with the holiday sacrifices and should not be interrupted so it is good to remove chapters 4 to 23. the sacrifices themselves are a problem if we beilieve the book of jeremia is good as religions teach then god DENIED commanding animal sacrifices with the word no/not I did not caommand sacrifices in the context of EAT them yourselves a similar message on isiah wich the religious corrupt but we should not believe the lies of leviticus because the god of israelites said through jeremia i did not command so believe god and reject the bad book of lies calledlevitivcus.

we have arrivesd at numbers with much more than twenty minutes.
*numbers too is summarised in joshua 24 and in the summary what is imprtant? god chose what is important in the summary. so the summary in joshua (24) is not only brief but truly is a complete summary which can replace all the pages from the start of "genesis until the end of joshua, end of chapter 23" without most of joshua itself because "not with your sword" reveals the lies in the beginning of the book joshua. six books in about six minutes!

clarification

in my previous post I described obama "shooting wildly in all directions"

http://tomsawyerssongs.blogspot.co.il/2017/01/obama-against-israel.html

 insulting russia with ambassador story and not helping the middle-eastern-ally Israel in the UN. it is easy to convince one person to be anti-israel especially if obama studied under muslim education as a child but to get a majority in congress to oppose obama shows that these congressman understand diplomacy and alliances. BRITIAN criticised the obama administration for being too harsh with israel. now I clarify what I refferred to in britian relations.

instead of apologizing, in response to british criticsm, obama shot back at the british, criticising their criticsm- as published NINE DAYS AGO not as I wrote "weeks ago" I refferred to the criticism and claimed obama was ending his diplomacy, now that he NO LONGER NEEDS the cooperation for his personal agenda so he can insult all over.

I concluded that this demonstrates that obama was what the racists suspected. there is some doubt which of obama's race and religion can be trusted and which cannot be trusted because their loyalty is first to something else but there is NO DOUBT and with certainty that the total of convicted criminals of all races plus "committed crimes not yet caught" would be much-much lower if those in obama's race were busy in the cotton fields. whether president or judges who might be "loyal first to their own race before justice" hence if all of that race would still be slaves, in the past, then with certainty the number of committed crimes as well as convicted criminals would be much much less.

could the first step to making a significant reduction in crime be slavery? I will need to study the statistics and demographics.

this site should show the demographics but hides them
https://www.bjs.gov/index.cfm?ty=tp&tid=942

oh well. 

obama against... israel?

recently the United nations criticed Israel about something. was

obama's decision (not to veto) AGAINST israel?

considering that obama also pissed off the russians at the same time, by sending away ambasadors as well as insulting britian a few weeks ago.

*we see a pattern this is not specifically anti-israel but the fact that obama NO LONGER NEEDS TO COOPERATE INTERNATIONALLY so he insults everyone he personnaly does not need.

this is because until now he needed international cooperation but no longer. 

he hopes that the pissed off allies will want revenge at america but putin and the allies are aware that obama is the decider and wait patiently to cooperate with trump showing just how bad obama is and who is the bigger man.

obama showed himself to be what every racist suspected him to be. if only obama was still a slave in the south. what is done is done.

the british hypocrytes complain about this despite they voted for "israels condemnation" huh?

http://www.reuters.com/article/us-israel-palestinians-britain-idUSKBN14J0L0

 and then accuse obama for not veto-ing- there can be some explanation:

they only voted thinking it WOULD HAVE  been veto-ed? hmm.

"non-biblical" christmas

it is common for protestants to REJECT ideas from catholic and other sources because they are "un-biblical" for example no santa on christmas etc. yet if so, we must consider the fact that jesus never taught his disciples, not even once in ALL four gospels to celebrate nor even mark the date of his "dwelling with" humans, nor his birth, nor his coming to the earth nor his birthday.

even if we go one step away from jesus' teachings to the practices in the book of acts the "original" christians never taught this "important" holiday of christmas in any form.

it is time for protestants to teach that "christmas" in any form is unbiblical without basis in the bible. and to stop succumbing to social norms.

teach the churchgoers we will not celebrate jesus having been born in any way not just the ddetails of santa or the tree but every detail not in the bible in any form. instead the teaching before christmas should be that jesus DIDD NOT teach to celebrate christmas in any form and no mass on december 25.

abraham was an alien- in which sense!

genesis 23.2-4

abraham said he is an alien.

traditional religions [jewish and christian] assume and teach that all genesis stories from creation are on this planet named Earth. admittedly the translations did not capitalize the letter 'e' of earth [genisis 1.1] and it might not refer to planet earth.

then religions insist people lived hundreds of years because the bible is true.

but what if abraham traveled from PLANET ur?

we have several puzzle pieces to assemble.

joshua 24.1-3 said "god took abraham" what if that does not mean walking!

this "god" is called plural in genesis 20.13
http://www.mechon-mamre.org/p/pt/pt0120.htm

this is not a spirit-god but gods who sent abraham.

if we accept this, then some problems vanish.

admittedly the bible might be false.

however if we say "took" means a super-being "took abraham" then it could be from PLANET ur.

we know that the orbit of  planet mercury takes less Earth-days than venus and venus's is less Earth-days than Earth's.

if genesis 11.14-15 is not "false" inaccurate then 433 years might not be Earth-years.

if it would be mercury-years it would be 433*88 Earth-days are 104 earth-years of orbits.

if someone came from a planet of EDEN frm whence where adam was rejected where the orbit was faster than mercury then upon arriving at the new planet they would say many years and only live 365*80 earth-days. this could be the commentary of PSALMS to genesis the biblical years were all 70-80 years.

planet EDEN might have had a fast orbit and less length, 30 earth-days [faster than mercury] and then it would not be false to say that 80 earth-years is counted as 900 orbits of Eden, the source of adam and his descendants.

noah was in a boat and could not see what happened for forty days. he thought he stayed on the same planet for a flood. but the lifespan reveals a different orbit speed. I will call the second place: planet noah but the bible might refer to it as PLANET ur. those who lived 80 earth years and called it 900 were counting eden-orbits.

upon arriving on planet mercury, then with water, unlike now, they did not live 900 orbits but 80*365 earth days which on mercury is about a quarter of years- 400 is like 100. perhaps then mercury-orbit was not 88 earth days but 80 earth days. 433*80=95 years.

a magical creature that wasnot spirit but magical physical "took" abraham- if joshua is not false as religions claim and with magic took from planet UR to the land of canaan on earth. 

his life was much less than those on planet ur because human life on this planet is 70-80 years as in psalms.

we may summarise three planets. eden and the expulsion to planet 2 perhaps named ur.

then abraham ws "taken" by a "god" powerful magician from planet ur to the 3 planet Earth where the story continues.

although on earth science has revealed the order of paleozoic first fish [who ate fish] then scorpions who ate each other and finally plants, genesis was not describing this planet EARTH, but a planet with a fast orbit and there the order was the reverse: plants and later fish called EDEN and those were the years counted on planet ur after rejection from eden.

or the bible lied.

close EPA - ?

in new york now the temperature is literraly freezing.

if i would put some water in a plastic cup and put it outdorrs the water would change to ice.

today december 15, the temperature is significantly COLDER than the average of the last thirty years. the average in new york would be a cold 43 degrees, yet the temperature is ACTUALLY below freezing below 32 farenheit by four degrees farenheit.

so people who claim the climate is changing because of methane and "greenhouse" are not only revealed a liars but as "alarmists" fanatics-falsely because the fact is the increased heat of industry and so called greenhouse gasses are not increasing the heat.

but they will say that is only today!

one day is still evidebce because if TRULY we had an impact on the climate the heat would constantly increase.

assiming warming causing flooding like the alarmists show us on tv, then the cooling we see today can calm us no flooding.

what about a weekly trend?

last week called december 4, 2016

the historical average was 46 degrees f. yet the actual temperature for that week was consistantly COOLER  than painfully-cold 43 degrees f.

the global warming alarmists will point at the one date fifth, when the temperature was slightly warmer yet still painfully cold: 49f instead of 46f and still painfully cold even with a coat, yet more days were colder two which is more than one and not only colder than the three degree difference between 46-49 but significantly colder -two days five and ten degrees colder whereas most of the week was the same as average so the trend is that the gasses are not increasing the heat- most days are the same and the exceptions are significantly colder.

 so hearing about more floods than before the internet does not mean there are actually more floods but that information can be spread faster because in fact the trens is the same or on more days SIGNIFICANTLY COLDER

after studying the evidence it is time to end the lies of the alarmists in the so-called environmental protection agency and hope that the SANE voice of the "skeptics" will guide president trump and remove "authority" from emotional-alarmists who mislead people when the facts can easily be compared- and cut the budget-spending.

the epa people can still have "freedom to lie" but not as an agency and with no authority to act.

zoo second attempt

when I was a child my mother made a mean joke when we went to the zoo. "how would you like to be behind bars like that animal."
sound mean until we think of a baby's crib - !
actually PRISON is very different from a zoo because. whereas humans kill- can kill and do kill- each other in prisons and out of prisons the animals are protected in a zoo like a baby in a crib.
when we hear that the number of a certain type of panda the giant panda is less than 2000, we must consider that only a few years ago there were LESS - !!
increasing from 1860 in 2014 to closer to 2000 now- and that is only one of the types of panda.
in fact the dumb animals, like babies, would- without bars- go out and get killed by hunters so the zoo is like a baby's crib bars. preventing the child from going out into danger of the street.
granting food and needs and protection, true protection unlike prisons.
so I am as pro-zoo as pro-crib.
crib has a bar is that evil? it keeps the ignorant baby from going into the street where cars go. and the same for dumb animals.

I support zoo

when I was a child my mother made a mean joke when we went to the zoo. "how would you like to be behind bars like that animal."

sound mean until we think of a baby's crib - !

actually PRISON is very different from a zoo because. whereas humans kill- can kill and do kill- each other in prisons and out of prisons the animals are protected in a zoo like a baby in a crib.

when we hear that the number of a certain type of panda the giant panda is less than 2000, we must consider that only a few years ago there were LESS - !!

increasing from 1860 in 2014 to closer to 2000 now- and that is only one of the types of panda.

in fact the dumb animals, like babies, would- without bars- go out and get killed by hunters so the zoo is like a baby's crib bars. preventing the child from going out into danger of the street.

granting food and needs and protection, true protection unlike prisons.

so I am as pro-zoo as pro-crib.

crib has a bar is that evil? it keeps the ignorant baby from going into the street where cars go. and the same for dumb animals.

truth about famous figures

I feel my responsibility to struggle for truth. i have heard accusations against several public figures and when studying the details they are truly innocent and even politically correct.

MEL GIBSON

has been accused of being a bad racist jew-hater- falsely.

the fact is that he never published jew-hating papers, in the way henry ford did, and only when drunk blurted out "the jews caused all the wars"- something said when drunk. usually politically correct. even that statement was only blame, not hate nor anger of personal nature neither self nor any specific jew. only blame and only when drunk and out of control. when not drunk he of course apologised for losing control in his drunkenness. I say:  "Jews should be more forgiving" because he apologised and was politically-correct.

the fact that he made a film which told the story about jesus being killed by the romans while jews shouted "crucify him"- we cannot expect him to CHANGE the story. 

i know plenty of jews that, given the chance, would shout the same thing and have spoken violently about those who disagree with them and those jews are the ones not politically correct. all gibson did was tell the story as recorded.

also, rachel shucker wrote that gibson was even "pro-jewish".[tablet]

HENRY FORD

ford was truly a jew-hater using his newspaper, independent, for hate towards jews. yet even he apologized and closed the paper in 1927.

source: history.com

what FORD truly wrote: “to my great regret,” he wrote, “I have learned that Jews…resent this publication as promoting anti-Semitism” end quote, this SEEMS TO ME  an apology, and as the article concludes "at the end of the year he closed down the Independent for good." although this story is presented as "insincere"

http://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/henry-ford-publishes-the-last-issue-of-the-dearborn-independent

HOWEVER, I say he apologized, therefore JEWS should be more forgiving to those who apologize.

last but not least: who does not enjoy the products of walt disney company?

WALT DISNEY

not only did he not boycott israeli companies but he even invested in an israeli company called AHAVA products- that is support for jews and Israel not hatred nor boycotting.

EVEN the israeli newspaper jerusalem post published that the acusations against walt disney are false and he was not a racist.
source: http://www.jpost.com/Israel-News/Culture/No-truth-in-claim-that-Walt-Disney-was-an-anti-Semite-410965

those jews who accuse these and other innocents, are the ones who are evil spreading lies.

finaly, although jews are angry at sincere-nazis, and this seems appropriate, they still need to be more forgiving to those who apologise.

weather compare

I saw on the news that utah already has snow this year.

ohio has lterally freezing temperatures called 32 fahrenheit (or less) also called zero centigrade.

also new york is close to zero c.

given a choice of "high schools" would you choose ohio? with snow a couple times this week and freezing temperatures?

or new york also freezing and also snow or florida with warm rain. maybe california with medium and less rain?

we need "educated" choices where to live.

and about global warming the ice "glaciers" calve- that does not mean melt, and they did not say melt! they said calve meaning the ice increased enough to push solid ice off the ground into the sea- MORE ice indicating cold.

now, winter the global-warming-trickers talk about ice melting in the southern hemisphere- because it is summer there... but the cold is as cold as ever in the US winter.

snow even before christmas.

special day In New York!

this week, has a special day to notice.
in the cycle of the sun: the nights get longer until the longest night in December.

however this week in new york city the "switch" from earliest sunset- meaning when the horizon rises  at eve to hide the sun at the earliest time, to later sunsets- meaning more than a full day between sunsets, this switch is this week on december 15 as seen from new york.

check sunset times for your city because each city sees the sunset from a diffrerent angle.

marriage, bitter or better? part 2

who would think that one letter could make such a difference.

for a man, lifetime out of marriage is better with an "e" because there is no limit to possibilities for mating, male or female.

marriage is bad and bitter with an "i" because it limits the spouses, and even defines outer sex as bad cheating- and this limitation allows for manipulations. 

who loses? if a man "punishes" his wife with no sex, then who loses? the man has always been the one desperate enough to pay for sex.

when have we ever seen women OFFERING money to a man to sleep with them? the women GET the money-

and marriage is the SAME arrangement- if the man GIVES her gold jewelry, the engagement ring and another ring and more gold jewelry later- and the women say harlots are victims-? that is the SAME as marriage and also ridiculous because they get the money. [the only issue is pimping not the harlotry itself a distinction which society blurs]

saying harlotry of sex for money is bad- then marriage is the same evil arrangement- gold jewelry and compliments for sex- a condition which if not provided, then do not expect a "wife" but a college-room mate only.

***woe to the man who "comments" about his wife's spending- then she says "I am not in the mood" either in truth because women are almost never in the mood for s,ex or because she is in the mood but is annoyed about the criticism.

considering women are rarely in the mood for sex and less in the mood during pregnancy it seems very appropriate to have four wives as the book of genesis described- 

when one is not in the mood she can wait a few weeks while i am with the others- yet society does not allow polygamy- calling it "immoral" despite it being in the holy book! and being very logical based on marriage experiences... in fact, society makes the wife-harlotry TOO EXPENSIVE for more than one wife. gold jewelry... and a million dresses...

so before any religious marriage consider that out of marriage is better [letter e] and trust me:

avoid religious marriages... any limitation resulting from marriage is the bitter [with letter i] status.

*as the divorcee explained to his young son and daughter who asked why are you leaving?

"it is not your fault, kids, would you be happy if you could only play with one of your toys", well said!

imagine playing the only one same video-action-game every day for a week with no variety.

the marriage creates limitations and manipulation, so who loses? the one who has always been desperate enough to pay for sex- the men.

too bad that the only medium to discuss this bitter truth is on comedy television because this is VERY SERIOUS.

we need to spread this difficult and very bitter [with i] truth.

it should be spoken about in churches too.

clergy need to tell people to get pre-nups [pre-marital agreements that discourage marriage for money and divorce] and... WAIT JUST A freaking minute! 

***what comes to mind with the terminology "church clergy"- what the heck! 

they can tell OTHERS "until death you are bound"

***no wonder clergy do not marry!

marriage?

what exactly is marriage?

marriage is a religious thing- that is why marriages are performed in THE CHURCH=it is religious. for same-genders to agree to commit to each other- is certainly different than the religious because religious will not "couple" same-gender. it is simply a commitment to bind them together without religion.

marriage is the commitment of the man and wife not have se,x with any other. that means that if one decides to deny the spouse se,x they are stuck because they committed to the marriage concept- who will suffer by this?

if we consider that women never PAID money to men, out of desperation for s,ex, while men did pay the "harlot" - that shows who is more desperate... hence the limitation of marriage puts the man at risk- if he does not honor his wife "enough" or "criticizes her spending" or other annoying, then she will say "I am not in the mood for sex and you will not rape me" and who suffers? she does not need to pay any man to do it. and the man can only get it when not married because of the religious commitment called marriage.

some people say that the harlot is the victim but consider the mans deperation even to pay money for se,x while the woman GETS the money, and in marriage has the same arrangement sex for GETS gold jewelery the only way not to feel like a harlot is not to have sex so the man becomes desperate yet again.

the men which "have always been" desperate enough to pay for sex will have no sex at all because the marriage "limits them" to manipulative women- leaving zero. so take my advice- 

**avoid marriage and avoid religious marriage.

if single women can have insemination then single men should be allowed to use out of marriage surrogate proxy for their child if they desire. 

if not the man loses again and loses more than the women who are almost NEVER in the mood anyway or are and lie that they have a headache...

sounds like bitter grapes? yet outside of marriage is not bitter! the options are there: male and female.

recount

jill stein is doing a recount of the votes as if they counted wrong the first time. even hilary accepted the results- what about hilary followers?

remember how hilary followers criticized trump for saying he would not honor the results- they said that is bad and now look at what those same hilary supporters are rioting- the same bad plus disturbing the peace.

Mark and Luke- unitarian

the gospels of mark and luke show that jesus taught he was not divine.

mark 10.17-18 "17 As Jesus started on his way, a man ran up to him and fell on his knees before him. “Good teacher,” he asked, “what must I do to inherit eternal life?” 18 “Why do you call me good?” Jesus answered. “No one is good,except God alone."-- jesus is separating himself from the divine.

instead of saying yes i am good because I am the same one, JESUS SEPARATES HIMSELF according to these gospels, and even denies his divinity. In contrast to john where Jesus teaches "I and the father are one" claiming divinity, this indicates that the compilation was "universal" meaning containing both groups opposing texts.

fascinating is jesus' response in that story in mark and luke and matthew in which he does not say "do all commandments" to get eternal life- but the opposite! when asked what to DO- he says NOT to kill etc. this indicates that actions in the prophecies from moses are not what earns life- doing them cannot earn the inheritance of life. from the commands- what is important to add to faith is NOT doing the bad. he does not say do "all ten" of commandments, nor "all commandments of the prophecies of moses" nor "do not eat blood"as acts decreed.

additionaly this story is in the context of "which" and does not say obey sabbath nor circumcise nor the ten nor even mention the books of moses.

some claim mark was written for gentiles so no proof unless matthew written for jews agress and this story- without the denial of divinity is in matthew 19- WHICH- and a list not all nor even all ten nor even circumcision- hence jesus fulfilled the prophecy of jeremiah that the new covenant is INTERNAL and not with physical actions. instead NOT acting bad with the faith. 

does this literally mean that if give everything deserves life? jesus often talked in parables and hints so this teaching is not a way to "earn" eternal life but instead indicates the IMPOSSIBILITY of earning with actions- and teaches especially in the context of "not kill steal lie" actions even if he would give all- still do not suffice for one must have faith and this message like others are parable not literal- [as some supporters of communism claim based on this text] because jesus often speaks in hints and parables to teach the lessons.

TRUST a President part 3

for many voters the KEY issue is trust.
the issue sadly is: from two candidates, each with much good, and also with some flaws, the issue is which flaw is "less" bad.
we considered the home computer-server

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-31806907

now consider of the story of:
**Donna Brazile-

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/01/us/politics/donna-brazile-wikileaks-cnn.html
these "help" topple the "neutralaty balance" in favor of one side- clearly unfair-
do we really want a president who "gets ahead" by not playing by the rules?

In addition to Mrs. Clinton's actions- of a computer server at home- these are TRUST issues.
this "work-related" [according to bbc] computer-server is not playing by the rules
"Shortly before she was sworn in as secretary of state in 2009, Hillary Clinton set up an email server at her home in Chappaqua, New York. She then relied on this server, home to the email address hdr22@clintonemail.com, for all her electronic correspondence - both work-related and personal - during her four years in office." source http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-31806907 

can we TRUST this democratic candidate?
even if this candidate would be male- the issue is: look at her actions!

 a vote for trump is- a vote against clinton.

TRUST a President- part 2

for many voters the KEY issue is trust.
the issue sadly is: from two candidates, each with much good, and also with some flaws, the issue is which flaw is "less" bad.
we considered the home server-

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-31806907
in addition to this TRUST issue of Hilary Clinton setting up the computer-server at home, separate from the network and "not playing according to the rules"- we also

should consider of the story of:
***Wasserman Schultz-

http://edition.cnn.com/2016/07/22/politics/dnc-wikileaks-emails/

where the democrats apologized for an apparent issue of "neutrality during the nominating process"-

this is a TRUST issue- how did Mrs. clinton "jockey" herself into position.
it is misleading to say "women haters criticize clinton" because the issue is this specific female democrat. why is there no "good" woman to be nominated?

*consider the story with
***Donna Brazile-

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/01/us/politics/donna-brazile-wikileaks-cnn.html

this is how Mrs. Clinton works and operates-[modus apparande or however you say it].

These in addition to the "work-related" [according to bbc] computer-server: "Shortly before she was sworn in as secretary of state in 2009, Hillary Clinton set up an email server at her home in Chappaqua, New York. She then relied on this server, home to the email address hdr22@clintonemail.com, for all her electronic correspondence - both work-related and personal - during her four years in office." source http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-31806907 

***can we TRUST Hilary? this democratic candidate?
can we trust this specific woman with the ARSENAL of nuclear weapons?
why is there no "good" woman to be nominated? 

 ***a vote for trump is a vote against clinton.

Crown-prince, a poem

The Crown-Prince (and his brothers the princes)

ts

:

Prince Jeffrey will wear

a crown on his head

because ex-King Jed

was found in bed- dead

TRUST a President, PART I

for many voters the KEY issue is trust.

can we trust either of the two candidates?

so- should we not vote at all??

the issue sadly is: from two ["flawed people" i apologize for this misleading phrase what i mean is that nobody is perfect- and not literally as an adjective describing "people". this idea is corected in future posts], which flaw is "less" bad.

there are several issues. this episode considers firstly-

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/03/03/us/politics/hillary-clintons-use-of-private-email-at-state-department-raises-flags.html?_r=0

according to "New York times" Mrs. Clinton did not "play by the rules"

"Mrs. Clinton did not have a government email address during her four-year tenure at the State Department. Her aides took no actions to have her personal emails preserved on department servers at the time, as required by the Federal Records Act."

if the issue is TRUST we must consider that ACCORDING TO BBC-

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-31806907

"Shortly before she was sworn in as secretary of state in 2009, Hillary Clinton set up an email server at her home etc." setting it up in her home separate from the network. 

therefore even if we assume that there were zero [what the current investigations are checking] emails with "illegal" content- -even among the deleted messages- the act to set up this server in her home is a TRUST issue.

A vote for trump is a vote against Hilary.

climate change!--??

although in the US, rain is common in summer and not in winter when rain is replaced by snow, the Mediterranean climate is very different. east of the Mediterranean sea- summer has no rain and spring has very little rain. no "april showers"!

so today i checked the weather in that zone and discovered no rain in october which is unusual.

this whole week called october 9-16 predicts dryness. admittedly there was rain in that zone once, a few weeks ago but there is some change. is it global warming? certainly not.

although some days are hotter- the majority of days are "less hot"

for example: the last week of september had only one "hotter" day relative to average. two days were the same, and 4 less hot. most of that stretch was less hot. even the other days had cooler nights than the average temperature in recent years. 

when the "concerned" and worried scientists try to spread the terror by pointing out the one hotter day most of the humans trust the lie. 

the few instances of resistance, pointing out that most of the week is cooler, is met by the trick phrase "climate change". so you admit that there is climate change- so SPREAD THE TERROR that the world is being destroyed by you driving and by factories etc. but when looking at the average of a week there is no CHANGE either: as a whole, some days are a bit cooler and one day a bit hotter and other days the same.

NO CHANGE. 

so drive your car and see the sights, even for pleasure- "sunday morning go for a ride" as the Beatles sang.