יום שני, 28 בנובמבר 2016

marriage?

what exactly is marriage?
marriage is a religious thing- that is why marriages are performed in THE CHURCH=it is religious. for same-genders to agree to commit to each other- is certainly different than the religious because religious will not "couple" same-gender. it is simply a commitment to bind them together without religion.
marriage is the commitment of the man and wife not have se,x with any other. that means that if one decides to deny the spouse se,x they are stuck because they committed to the marriage concept- who will suffer by this?
if we consider that women never PAID money to men, out of desperation for s,ex, while men did pay the "harlot" - that shows who is more desperate... hence the limitation of marriage puts the man at risk- if he does not honor his wife "enough" or "criticizes her spending" or other annoying, then she will say "I am not in the mood for sex and you will not rape me" and who suffers? she does not need to pay any man to do it. and the man can only get it when not married because of the religious commitment called marriage.
some people say that the harlot is the victim but consider the mans deperation even to pay money for se,x while the woman GETS the money, and in marriage has the same arrangement sex for GETS gold jewelery the only way not to feel like a harlot is not to have sex so the man becomes desperate yet again.
the men which "have always been" desperate enough to pay for sex will have no sex at all because the marriage "limits them" to manipulative women- leaving zero. so take my advice- 
**avoid marriage and avoid religious marriage.
if single women can have insemination then single men should be allowed to use out of marriage surrogate proxy for their child if they desire. 
if not the man loses again and loses more than the women who are almost NEVER in the mood anyway or are and lie that they have a headache...
sounds like bitter grapes? yet outside of marriage is not bitter! the options are there: male and female.

recount

jill stein is doing a recount of the votes as if they counted wrong the first time. even hilary accepted the results- what about hilary followers?
remember how hilary followers criticized trump for saying he would not honor the results- they said that is bad and now look at what those same hilary supporters are rioting- the same bad plus disturbing the peace.

יום ראשון, 20 בנובמבר 2016

Mark and Luke- unitarian

the gospels of mark and luke show that jesus taught he was not divine.
mark 10.17-18 "17 As Jesus started on his way, a man ran up to him and fell on his knees before him. “Good teacher,” he asked, “what must I do to inherit eternal life?” 18 “Why do you call me good?” Jesus answered. “No one is good,except God alone."-- jesus is separating himself from the divine.
instead of saying yes i am good because I am the same one, JESUS SEPARATES HIMSELF according to these gospels, and even denies his divinity. In contrast to john where Jesus teaches "I and the father are one" claiming divinity, this indicates that the compilation was "universal" meaning containing both groups opposing texts.
fascinating is jesus' response in that story in mark and luke and matthew in which he does not say "do all commandments" to get eternal life- but the opposite! when asked what to DO- he says NOT to kill etc. this indicates that actions in the prophecies from moses are not what earns life- doing them cannot earn the inheritance of life. from the commands- what is important to add to faith is NOT doing the bad. he does not say do "all ten" of commandments, nor "all commandments of the prophecies of moses" nor "do not eat blood"as acts decreed.
additionaly this story is in the context of "which" and does not say obey sabbath nor circumcise nor the ten nor even mention the books of moses.
some claim mark was written for gentiles so no proof unless matthew written for jews agress and this story- without the denial of divinity is in matthew 19- WHICH- and a list not all nor even all ten nor even circumcision- hence jesus fulfilled the prophecy of jeremiah that the new covenant is INTERNAL and not with physical actions. instead NOT acting bad with the faith. 
does this literally mean that if give everything deserves life? jesus often talked in parables and hints so this teaching is not a way to "earn" eternal life but instead indicates the IMPOSSIBILITY of earning with actions- and teaches especially in the context of "not kill steal lie" actions even if he would give all- still do not suffice for one must have faith and this message like others are parable not literal- [as some supporters of communism claim based on this text] because jesus often speaks in hints and parables to teach the lessons.

יום שני, 7 בנובמבר 2016

TRUST a President part 3

for many voters the KEY issue is trust.
the issue sadly is: from two candidates, each with much good, and also with some flaws, the issue is which flaw is "less" bad.
we considered the home computer-server
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-31806907
now consider of the story of:
**Donna Brazile-
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/01/us/politics/donna-brazile-wikileaks-cnn.html
these "help" topple the "neutralaty balance" in favor of one side- clearly unfair-
do we really want a president who "gets ahead" by not playing by the rules?
In addition to Mrs. Clinton's actions- of a computer server at home- these are TRUST issues.
this "work-related" [according to bbc] computer-server is not playing by the rules
"Shortly before she was sworn in as secretary of state in 2009, Hillary Clinton set up an email server at her home in Chappaqua, New York. She then relied on this server, home to the email address hdr22@clintonemail.com, for all her electronic correspondence - both work-related and personal - during her four years in office." source http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-31806907 
can we TRUST this democratic candidate?
even if this candidate would be male- the issue is: look at her actions!
 a vote for trump is- a vote against clinton.

יום ראשון, 6 בנובמבר 2016

TRUST a President- part 2

for many voters the KEY issue is trust.
the issue sadly is: from two candidates, each with much good, and also with some flaws, the issue is which flaw is "less" bad.
we considered the home server-
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-31806907
in addition to this TRUST issue of Hilary Clinton setting up the computer-server at home, separate from the network and "not playing according to the rules"- we also
should consider of the story of:
***Wasserman Schultz-
http://edition.cnn.com/2016/07/22/politics/dnc-wikileaks-emails/
where the democrats apologized for an apparent issue of "neutrality during the nominating process"-
this is a TRUST issue- how did Mrs. clinton "jockey" herself into position.
it is misleading to say "women haters criticize clinton" because the issue is this specific female democrat. why is there no "good" woman to be nominated?
*consider the story with
***Donna Brazile-
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/01/us/politics/donna-brazile-wikileaks-cnn.html
this is how Mrs. Clinton works and operates-[modus apparande or however you say it].
These in addition to the "work-related" [according to bbc] computer-server: "Shortly before she was sworn in as secretary of state in 2009, Hillary Clinton set up an email server at her home in Chappaqua, New York. She then relied on this server, home to the email address hdr22@clintonemail.com, for all her electronic correspondence - both work-related and personal - during her four years in office." source http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-31806907 
***can we TRUST Hilary? this democratic candidate?
can we trust this specific woman with the ARSENAL of nuclear weapons?
why is there no "good" woman to be nominated? 
 ***a vote for trump is a vote against clinton.

יום שלישי, 1 בנובמבר 2016

Crown-prince, a poem

The Crown-Prince (and his brothers the princes)
ts
:
Prince Jeffrey will wear
a crown on his head
because ex-King Jed
was found in bed- dead

TRUST a President, PART I

for many voters the KEY issue is trust.
can we trust either of the two candidates?
so- should we not vote at all??
the issue sadly is: from two ["flawed people" i apologize for this misleading phrase what i mean is that nobody is perfect- and not literally as an adjective describing "people". this idea is corected in future posts], which flaw is "less" bad.
there are several issues. this episode considers firstly-
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/03/03/us/politics/hillary-clintons-use-of-private-email-at-state-department-raises-flags.html?_r=0
according to "New York times" Mrs. Clinton did not "play by the rules"
"Mrs. Clinton did not have a government email address during her four-year tenure at the State Department. Her aides took no actions to have her personal emails preserved on department servers at the time, as required by the Federal Records Act."
if the issue is TRUST we must consider that ACCORDING TO BBC-
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-31806907
"Shortly before she was sworn in as secretary of state in 2009, Hillary Clinton set up an email server at her home etc." setting it up in her home separate from the network. 
therefore even if we assume that there were zero [what the current investigations are checking] emails with "illegal" content- -even among the deleted messages- the act to set up this server in her home is a TRUST issue.
A vote for trump is a vote against Hilary.