hurray for netanyahu!

although israel's new and old prime minister is making a "silly circus" out of laws by voting now AGAINST against the laws he had previously voted for- he has still achieved several achievements

in his interim government- his policies lowered unemployment

in march unemployment was low, 5.2% but by the end of april it fell further to only 4.9%

this might not last- now that a certain law, which had encouraged religious to work, - has been repealed and they are back to "being encouraged not to work" but still- facts are facts and hurray for ntanyahu!

 meanwhile the opposition is exaggerating the flaws-

 and acting what we westerners call "sore losers"

SORE LOSERS

in  england the leader of the labor who lost the election to prime minister admitted his leadership was not effective by exiting-

but herzog refuses to admit he failed to become prime minister and will not admit that his leadership was ineffective- can this be real? jesus christ!

he acts like a sore loser by ridiculing netanyahu and calling the "composition of the new government a game of musical chairs" however netanyahu has created jobs in the government and for the citizens as mentioned.

herzog refuses to admit his leadership was bad and his attacks on netanyahu are not "by topic" but ridicule of a SORE LOSER we can be grateful that the one who acts like herzog was not the prime minister!

merez is also exaggerating its criticsm and although the direction is good and shows that jews care about the suffering in sudan, still the complaint is exaggerated and israel should continue selling weapons openly to assist south sudan because if not lives will "not be saved".

herzog should quit and his ridicule of ntanyahu shows he is a sore loser. 

is infant circumcision legal?

is the circumcision of infants legal?

no law explicitly permits it!

if someone stabs someone that IS illegal  and therefore a crime.

any violence with a knife is "illegal" and noone can claim "the law does not explicitly forbid "cutting the left arm" and "with this precise size blade" because all knife attacks are illegal and punishable-

therefore circumcison is a crime.

circumcisers are criminals.

and those who circumcise jewish babies show by their action of attacking a jewish baby that they are an anti-semite- one who cuts a jewish baby shows he is a jew-hater...

in contrast to the PROTECTORS of jewish babies... who the rabbis call anti-semite?

can that be?? jesus christ!

so call it a different name? it is still injury by knife.

is it surgery?

surgery is the respons to a medical problem which is different from removing healthy skin in circumcision.

what about the baby's right to choose which religion he will believe in- when he is older- let freedom ring!

we must protect the freedom of religion- of the child!

death in western society 2006

death
It's never better staying ignorant. Willful ignorance is surrending control.
+let's just say, you know, that Death does have a conscious plan, and that it's been set into motion.
+ Death controls and frames our lives. Our birth is nothing but death begun.
final destination 3 2006

nothing obama does will escape complaint

yesterday a high ranking official from "islamic state" organization=ISISO was attacked and in the battle he and his guards died in battle.

some responded "finally obama  helped he should have attacked sooner" NO NO NO!

if it would weaken the ISISO- then that would help the syrian government which the rebels are trying to ignore-

that means many complain that he helped assad when the rebels need help against a ruler who did cruel wicked things besides chemical weapon on villages as reported.

others complain that it does not really "change" anything so so it was "not an accomplishment"

the only comfort is that the two complaints BALANCE each other that if so, then it does not help assad and both opinions are satisfied.

yet there is a third complaint- jesus christ!

my opinion is that the US must not send ground troops to help either side- especially when the neighbors there: jordan and saudis know not to.

my opinion is that the US should openly assist the rebels with intelligence information and sell weapons openly- and only- to rebels to help against assad- because we must not forget how this all began however not send any ground troops to help either side not to help assad against the ISIS and not to help ISIS against assad

we must learn from the jordanians and saudis who know not to send troops to syria despite saudis sending troops to yemen this comparison helps us comprehend that suadi understands the "situation near them" and we should learn from them- not to send troops to syria 

i complain we sent troops at all into a dangerous war zone despite the balance mentioned the send troops are happy because he sent and the do not are happy because it "does not change much" but i complain that it was sent-  hopefully a one time intervention and the US troops will not return to iraq nor enter syria because we will learn from the saudis who despite willingness to to send troops to yemen- still show with their actions that syria is different

so obama should not send any troops and no more land attacks in syria because helping assad is bad and that also helps shia terrorist hezbolla 

also weakening assad directly helps the rebels which seems "good" while also helping sunni ISIS and sunni hamas.

sadly isis fights the rebels too and if we want "freedom of choice" we must help the rebels against the dictator-president and also help rebels defend against ISIS by selling weapons openly to the free syria air force and rebels openly in the name of "freedom" and information as mentioned and similarly for the sunni-resistance to ISIS in iraq.

"let freedom ring!!"

is the quran "noble"?

we should know what is in the quran

then we can measure if the Islamic state represents islam as they claim to quote allah or believe those muslims "against isis"

yes they do protest on the internet. but when you hear what they say you respond "can that be true"? jesus christ!

one website protested islamic state claiming they are against it because "israelis are the masters of ISIS [organization]" yes blame the jew.

so what does the quran say?

Surat Al-Baqarah (The Cow) 2.190-191

Fight in the way of Allah those who fight you but do not transgress. Indeed. Allah does not like transgressors. And kill them [those who fight you] wherever you overtake them and expel them from wherever they have expelled you, and fitnah is worse than killing. And do not fight them at al-Masjid al- Haram until they fight you there. But if they fight you, then kill them. Such is the recompense of the disbelievers.

this context has both sides "those who fight you and the disbeleivers" so the islamic state represents islam.

http://quran.com/2/188-194

to help clarify i bring from quran surat at tawbah repentance 9.29 

Fight those who do not believe in Allah or in the Last Day and who do not consider unlawful what Allah and His Messenger have made unlawful and who do not adopt the religion of truth from those who were given the Scripture - [fight] until they give the jizyah willingly while they are humbled."

surat at tawbah repentance 9.29 removes the doubt [of the previous qoute and alone suffices so the link]

http://quran.com/9/29

the cause of the fight is against the "unbelievers" exactly what isis does representing the will of allah in the quran.

==

when discussing with "muslims against ISIS" they have two 2 tricks: first they say "muhamed never said"

this way, those who do not know these quotes are fooled and TRICKED MISLED that he never said.

when i pointed out that i do know the quotes- guess what they said?

"the words are in the quran but muhamed is not the author of the quran"

what a sly trick

!!

muhamed never said- only allah said

okay two more quotes because we should know what the quran said.

2.193+2.216

at html webpage

http://www.wvinter.net/~haught/Koran.html

besides the seven explicit calls to battle and 9.29 suffices alone there are actualy more than one hundred

source

http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/quran/023-violence.htm

so do not be fooled

the non-violent muslims are serving the purpose of both violent and non-violent to make the "job easier for the violent ones" [who they agree with because the quran said] but who tell us "muhamed never said" to trick us and make us less "resistant"

World events- now more than before- announce a message from God

God says: no religion understood me

no laws nor limits, both good: zed and zee

not Hinduism and not Buddhism

from Ramadan and Baptism you're free

No Jewish fasts, don't let rabbis decide

the only black and white is a zebra

no cruel cutting babies, we must protect

Just be kind, Ignore the rules in Torah.

   note: God speaks through events in the world. we see the fruit of religions too. about water-baptism even the new testament frees in 1 Cor. 1.17

about cutting babies which is painful and cruel see the baby song on the page: just click the link!  http://tomsawyerssongs.blogspot.co.il/2014/06/the-baby-song.html

   note: this rhyme [besides a new adaptation] was first published in july 2014 when I was "instructed" to announce the message. here is the link

http://tomsawyerssongs.blogspot.co.il/2014/07/a-song-with-important-ideas.html

nepal

a media for news announced that the govenrment of nepal has ordered all foreigners, involved in assitance related to the recent earthquake, to exit the country
this relates to israel whose assitance team was over 100 and significantly larger than any other country's assistance teams 122 israelis in contrast to
t37 taiwanese [part of china now] and 23 thailandese
https://he-il.facebook.com/IsraelHasbara/photos/a.425117174200109.98939.178389198872909/937247376320417/?type=1
yay for the merciful compassionate and helpful israelis
in terms of people missing by the date 28 april 42 isreali tourists were still missing and without contact while many families and many singles were being evacuated
an unofficial source [a friend on facebook] wrote that 20 of the israelis in nepal at the time of the earthquake were men who went to arrange a"birth mother" because they were "gay" couples
obviously if two men "lay" together they will not become pregnant for a child and according to the bible leviticus for jews and romans for christians the act is forbidden
to have child they pay a woman to birth a baby for them something the bible does not explicitly forbid
the connection of gay to the earthquake resulted in the claim by religious jews that the earthquake shows god is "pissed off" about gay
http://www.bhol.co.il/Article_EN.aspx?id=83045&cat=18
we can reply with two possibilites
first that the gay people were not attacked by the earthquake but instead were safely ecvacuated so god "failed" to "get" the sinners in the earthquake
another possibility is that god does not exist but is imaginary and certainly the god described in exodus "merciful" does not exist considering the absnce of ercy when housands dies 7000 and many more injured and homeless in the earthquake alone
another issue is that the earthquake hurt many who were not gay at a time when the gay were evacuated so the rabbis response does not match
in other words if someone said this proves god does not exist because no force had mercy and the bible is false about the existence of a mericuk god the rabbis respond this is a punishment the problem is that what they picked does not match because the gay were not punished and many others did suffer which refutes the thoughtless claim and returns the challenge